Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toward a Sociotechnical Systems Framing for Performance-Based Design for Fire Safety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Cognitive and Autonomous Systems for Fire Resilient Infrastructures

  • 510 Accesses

Abstract

The framework for performance-based design for fire safety that is in use today is based largely on constructs that emerged in the early 1990s. The framework has its origins in systems approaches to fire design for buildings that were pioneered in the 1970s, which in turn made use of the fire safety science principles and constructs that began to emerge in the 1950s. It has proven to be adaptable to deterministic and probabilistic realizations, and is arguably a risk-informed approach, whether benchmarked to tolerable risk as embodied in regulatory provisions or makes use of quantitative risk measures. The framework contemplates technologies—in the form of safety technologies and computational modeling for hazard assessment—and people—primarily as targets to be protected by the safety technologies. The framework also considers the regulatory environments within which it is applied. Nonetheless, performance-based design for fire safety is not as broadly accepted as performance-based design approaches in other disciplines. Arguably, this is due in part to a lack of a socio-technical systems framing and due consideration of the associated people-technology-institutions interactions that impact fire safety throughout the life of a building. Stakeholders have concerns about the application of technologies in the design process, the qualifications of practitioners, and how the building will perform in the future. Furthermore, current approaches to design often do not incorporate the technologies that can help maintain a target level of fire safety performance, either by notifying persons who can take action, or autonomously modifying building fire safety parameters. These challenges can be overcome. This chapter introduces some concepts of socio-technical systems thinking and system safety thinking, how they can be applied throughout the lifecycle of a building, and how these concepts and approaches can result in more robust, sociotechnical systems oriented, performance-based designs for fire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lucht, D.A., Ed., Proceedings, Conference on Firesafety Design in the 21st Century, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meacham, B.J. and Custer, R.L.P., “Performance-Based Fire Safety Engineering: An Introduction of Basic Concepts,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 2, 35-54, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Proceedings, 1 st International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Custer, R.L.P. and Meacham, B.J., Introduction to Performance-Based Fire Safety, NFPA, Quincy, MA, June 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meacham, B.J., Assessment of the Technological Requirements for Realization of Performance-Based Fire Safety Design in the United States, GCR 98-761, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hadjisophocleous, G.V., Benichou, N. and Tamim, A.S., “Literature Review of Performance-Based Fire Codes and Design Environment,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, Volume 9, Issue: 1, pp. 12-40, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/104239159800900102, 1998.

  7. Meacham, B.J., “International Experience in the Development and Use of Performance-Based Fire Safety Design Methods: Evolution, Current Situation, and Thoughts for the Future,” Fire Safety Science. 6: 59-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.6-59, 2000.

  8. Meacham, B.J., The Evolution of Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, GCR 98-763, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guidelines for the Introduction of Performance-Based Building Regulations (Discussion Paper), Inter-jurisdictional Regulatory Collaboration Committee (IRCC), Canberra, ACT, Australia, 1998 (https://ircc.info/Doc/Guidelines%20for%20the%20Introduction%20of%20Performance-Based%20Building%20Regulations%20[Discussion%20Paper]%20(1998).pdf, accessed 19 July 2021).

  10. Meacham, B.J., Moore, A., Bowen, R. and Traw, J., “Performance-Based Building Regulation: Current Situation and Future Needs,” Building Research & Information, 33, 1, 91-106, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meacham, B.J., Ed., Performance-Based Building Regulatory Systems: Principles and Experiences, Inter-jurisdictional Regulatory Collaboration Committee (IRCC), Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2009 (https://ircc.info/Doc/A1163909.pdf, accessed 19 July 2021).

  12. Kawagoe, K., Fire Behaviour in Rooms, Report No. 27, Building Research Institute of Japan, Tokyo, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas, P. H., “Studies of Fires in Buildings Using Models, Part 1,” Research, London, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 69–77, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas, P. H. and Heselden, A. J. M., “Behaviour of Fully Developed Fire in an Enclosure,” Combustion and Flame, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 133–135, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kawagoe, K. and Sekine, T., “Estimation of Fire Temperature-Time Curves in Rooms,” Occasional Report No. 11, Building Research Institute of Japan, Tokyo, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salzberg, F. and Waterman, T. E., “Studies of Building Fires with Models,” Fire Technology, Vol. 2, No. 3, 196–203, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas, P. H., Heselden, A. J. M., and Law, M., “Fully Developed Compartment Fires — Two Kinds of Behaviour,” Fire Research Technical Paper No. 18, H. M. Stationery Office, London, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heselden, A.J.M., Thomas, P.H. & Law, M., “Burning rate of ventilation-controlled fires in compartments,” Fire Technology, 6, 123–125, https://doi-org.ludwig.lub.lu.se/10.1007/BF02588898, 1970.

  19. For a compilation of fundamental fire safety science concepts that underpin fire safety engineering, see for example Drysdale, D., An Introduction to Fire Dynamics, 2nd Edition, Wiley, London, 1999, and Hurley, M., Ed., SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 5th Edition, Springer, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cornell., C.A., “Bounds on the Reliability of Structural Systems,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the Structural Division, Volume 93, 171-200, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moses, F. and Stevenson, J.D., “Reliability-Based Structural Design,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the Structural Division, Volume 96, Issue 2, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ang, A.H.S., “Structural Risk Analysis and Reliability-Based Design,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the Structural Division, Volume 99 Issue 9, September 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ang, A.H.S and Cornell., C.A., “Reliability Bases of Structural Safety and Design,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the Structural Division, Volume 100 Issue 9, September 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ellingwood, B., MacGregor, J.G., Galambos, T.V. and Cornell, C.A., “Probability-based load criteria: load factors and load combinations,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the Structural Division, Volume 108. Issue 5, 978-997, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Farmer, F.R., “Siting Criteria—A New Approach,” IAEA Symposium on the Containment and Siting of Nuclear Power Reactors, IAEA SM-89/34, Vienna, Austria, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Starr, C., “Societal Benefit vs. Technological Risk,” Science, 165, pp. 1232–1238, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rassmusen, N.C. et al., Reactor safety study. An assessment of accident risks in U. S. commercial nuclear power plants. WASH-1400 Report. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, USA, doi:https://doi.org/10.2172/7134131, 1975

  28. Rowe, W.D., Anatomy of Risk, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rassmussen, N.C., “The Application of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Techniques to Energy Technologies,” Annual Review of Energy, Vol. 6, pp. 123-138, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kaplan, S. and Garrick, J.B., “On the Quantitative Definition of Risk,” Risk Analysis, Vol. I, No. I, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  31. IChemE. Nomenclature for hazard and risk assessment in the process industries, Institution of Chemical Engineers, UK, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pettersson, O., Magnusson, S. E., & Thor, J., Fire Engineering Design of Steel Structures, Bulletin of Division of Structural Mechanics and Concrete Construction, Bulletin 52, Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lie, T.T., “Safety factors for fire loads,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 6(4): 617-628, doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/l79-074, 1979.

  34. Pettersson, O., Reliability Based Design of Fire Exposed Concrete Structures. LUTVDG/TVBB--3004--SE, vol. 3004, vol. 3004, Division of Building Fire Safety and Technology, Lund Institute of Technology, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Magnusson, S.E. and Pettersson, O., “Rational design methodology for fire exposed load bearing structures,” Fire Safety Journal, Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 227-241, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(81)90046-1, 1981.

  36. Harmathy, T and Mehaffey, J., “Design of Buildings for Prescribed Levels of Structural Fire Safety,” in Fire Safety: Science and Engineering, T. Harmathy, Ed., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 160-175, doi:10.1520/STP35296S, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  37. GSA, Building Fire Safey Criteria, Appendix D: Interim Guide for Goal-Oriented Systems Approach to Building Fire Safety, U.S. General Services Administration, Washington, DC, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nelson, H.E., Directions to Improve Applications of Systems Approach to Fire Protection Requirements for Buildings, SFPE Technology Report 77-8, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, USA, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Watts, J., The Goal-Oriented Systems Approach, NBS-GCR-77-103, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  40. NFPA 550, Guide to the Fire Safety Concepts Tree, National Fire Protection Association, Qunicy, MA, USA, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wakamatsu, T., “Fire Research in Japan - Development of a Design System for Building Fire Safety,” Proceedings of the 6th Joint Panel Meeting, UNJR Panel on Fire Research and Safety, Tokyo, Japan, p. 882, 10-14 May 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fitzgerald, R.W., “An Engineering Method for Building Fire Safety Analysis,” Fire Safety Journal, 9., 223-243, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Beard, A.N., “Towards a Systemic Approach to Fire Safety,” Proceedings, 1 st International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, Hemisphere Publishing co., New York, NY, USA, p 943, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fire Safety and Engineering Project, Project Report and Technical Papers, Books 1 and 2, The Warren Centre for Advanced Engineering, the University of Sydney, Australia, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rasbash, D. J., Ramachandran, G., Kandola, B, Watts, J. M., and Law, M., Evaluation of Fire Safety, John Wiley and Sons, London, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Emmons, H.W., “The prediction of fires in buildings,” Proc. Seventeenth Int. Symposium on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, p. 1101, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mitler, H.E., The Physical Basis for the Harvard Computer Fire Code, Home Fire Project Tech. Report. No. 34, Harvard University, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yang, K.T. and Liu, V.K., UNDSAFE-HA Computer Code for Buoyant Turbulent Flow in an Enclosure with Radiation, Tech. Report TR79002-78-3, Dept. Aero. and Mech. Eng., Univ. of Notre Dame, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zukoski, E.E. and Kubota, T., Two-layer modeling of smoke movement in building fires,” Fire Mater. 4, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tanaka, T., “A Model on Fire Spread in Small Scale Buildings,” BRI Research Paper 84, Building Research Institute, Japan, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Quintiere, J.G., “An approach to modeling wall fire spread in a room,” Fire Safety Journal, 3, p 201, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Buchanan, A., Fire Engineering Design Guide, Centre for Advanced Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, July 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Fire Code Reform Centre, Fire Engineering Guidelines, Sydney, Australia, March, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fire Safety Engineering in Buildings, DD 240: Parts 1 and 2: 1997, British Standards Institute, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  55. ISO TR 13387, Part I: The Application of Fire Performance Concepts to Design Objectives, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tanaka, T., “The Outline of a Performance-Based Fire Safety Design System of Buildings,” Proceedings of the 7th International Research and Training Seminar on Regional Development Planning for Disaster Prevention, Improved Firesafety Systems in Developing Countries, United Nations Center for Regional Development, Tokyo, Japan, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  57. SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection: Analysis and Design of Buildings, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Fitzgerald, R.W., Building Fire Performance Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, London, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fitzgerald, R.W. and Meacham, B.J., Fire Performance Analysis for Buildings, John Wiley & Sons, London, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  60. NFPA 550, Guide to the Fire Safety Concepts Tree, 2022 edition. Copyright© 2021, National Fire Protection Association. (For a full copy of NFPA 550, please go to www.nfpa.org)

  61. SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection, 2nd Edition, Society of Fire Protection Engineers and National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  62. International Fire Engineering Guidelines. National Research Council of Canada. International Code Council. New Zealand. Department of Building and Housing. Australian Building Codes Board. Canberra, ACT: Australian Building Codes Board, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Leitfaden Ingenieurmethoden des Brandschutzes, Technisch-Wissenschaftlicher Beirat (TWB) der Vereinigung zur Förderung des Deutschen Brandschutzes e.V. (vfdb), Altenberge, Deutschland, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Verification Method C/VM2: Framework for Fire Safety Design, Amendment 5, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE), Wellington, New Zealand, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  65. ISO 23932:2018, Fire safety engineering — General Principles: Part 1 - General, International Organization for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  66. BS7974:2019, Application of fire safety engineering principles to the design of buildings. Code of practice, British Standards Institution, London, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Australian Fire Engineering Guidelines, ©Commonwealth of Australia and States and Territories of Australia 2021, published by the Australian Building Codes Board, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wang, Y., Burgess, I., Wald, F. and Gillie, M., Performance-Based Fire Engineering of Structures, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Purkiss, J.A. and Li, L.-Y., Fire Safety Engineering Design of Structures, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Hurley, M.J. and Rosenbaum, E.R., Performance-Based Fire Safety Design, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hurley, M.J., Editor, SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Springer, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Buchanan, A.H. and Abu, A.K., Structural Design for Fire Safety, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  73. LaMalva, K., Editor, Structural Fire Engineering, Fire Protection Committee, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA, https://ascelibrary.org/doi/book/10.1061/9780784415047, 2018.

  74. Barry, T.F., Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Industrial Fire Protection − An Alternative to Prescriptive Codes, First Edition, TFBarry Publications, 704 pages, Publisher: Tennessee Valley Publishing, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA, 2002. ISBN 1-882194-09-8.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Lundin, J. Development of a Framework for Quality Assurance of Performance-Based Fire Safety Designs, Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 15 (1): 14–19, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1042391505045581, 2005.

  76. Johann, M. A., Albano, L. D., Fitzgerald, R. W., & Meacham, B. J., Performance-Based Structural Fire Safety, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 20(1), 45–53, doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:1(45), 2006.

  77. Meacham, B.J., “Chapter 2 - Extreme Event Mitigation Through Risk-Informed Performance-Based Analysis and Design,” in Extreme Event Mitigation in Buildings: Analysis and Design (B.J. Meacham and M.A. Johann, eds.), IBSN-10:0877657432, NFPA, Quincy, MA, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Hamilton, S.R., Performance-based fire engineering for steel framed structures: a probabilistic methodology, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Albrecht C. A risk-informed and performance-based life safety concept in case of fire [Ph.D. thesis]. Technical University of Braunschweig, Institute for Building Materials, Concrete Construction and Fire Protection (iBMB); URL: http://www.digibib.tu-bs.de/?docid=00043585. 2012.

  80. Alvarez, A., Meacham, B.J., Dembsey, N.A. and Thomas, J.R., “20 Years of Performance-Based Fire Protection Design: Challenges Faced and a Look Ahead,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1042391513484911, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2013.

  81. Van Hees, P., Validation and Verification of Fire Models for Fire Safety Engineering, Procedia Engineering 62 (January): 154–68, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.052, 2013.

  82. Bjelland, H. and Borg, A.. “On the Use of Scenario Analysis in Combination with Prescriptive Fire Safety Design Requirements.” Environment Systems & Decisions 33 (1): 33–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-012-9425-2. 2013.

  83. Alvarez, A., Meacham, B.J., Dembsey, N.A. and Thomas, J.R., “A Framework for Risk-Informed Performance-Based Fire Protection Design for The Built Environment,” Fire Technology, DOI 10.1007/s10694-013-0366-1, Vol. 50, pp161-181, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Bjelland H, Njå O, Heskestad AW, Braut GS. The Concepts of Safety Level and Safety Margin: Framework for Fire Safety Design of Novel Buildings. Fire Technology. 51:409–441. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Park, H., Meacham, B.J., Dembsey, N.A. and Goulthorpe, M., Improved incorporation of fire safety performance into building design process, Building Research and Information, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.913452, published on-line 16 May 2014, print January 2015.

  86. Borg A, Njå O, Torero J., A Framework for Selecting Design Fires in Performance Based Fire Safety Engineering, Fire Technology, 51(4):995-1017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-014-0454-x. 2015.

  87. Park, H., Meacham, B.J., Dembsey, N.A., and Goulthorpe, M., Conceptual Models for Holistic Building Fire Safety Performance Analysis, Fire Technology, DOI:10.1007/s10694-013-0374-1, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 173–193, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Meacham, B.J. and Alvarez-Rodriguez, A. Risk-Informed Performance-Based Design for Fire: Concepts and Framework, Final Report, NIST GCR 15-1000, dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.GCR.15-1000, Gaithersburg, MD, March 2015.

  89. Dai X, Welch S, Usmani A., A critical review of “travelling fire” scenarios for performance-based structural engineering. Fire Safety Journal. 91:568-578. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.04.001. 2017.

  90. Gehandler, J., The theoretical framework of fire safety design: Reflections and alternatives, Fire Safety Journal, Volume 91, Pages 973-981, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.034. 2017.

  91. Shrivastava, M., Abu, A., Dhakal, R. and Moss, P., State-of-the-art of probabilistic performance based structural fire engineering, Journal of Structural Fire Engineering, 10(2):175-192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-02-2018-0005. 2019.

  92. Van Coile, R., Hopkin, D., Lange, D. et al. The Need for Hierarchies of Acceptance Criteria for Probabilistic Risk Assessments in Fire Engineering. Fire Technology. 55, 1111–1146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0746-7. 2019.

  93. Van Weyenberge, B., Deckers, X., Caspeele, R. et al. Development of an Integrated Risk Assessment Method to Quantify the Life Safety Risk in Buildings in Case of Fire. Fire Technology. 55, 1211–1242. https://doi-org.ludwig.lub.lu.se/10.1007/s10694-018-0763-6. 2019.

  94. Gernay, T. and Elhami Khorasani, N., Recommendations for performance-based fire design of composite steel buildings using computational analysis, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Volume 166, 105906, ISSN 0143-974X, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105906. 2020.

  95. Kuehnen, R., Youssef, M. and El-Fitiany, S, Performance-based design of RC beams using an equivalent standard fire. Journal of Structural Fire Engineering, v. 12, n. 1, p. 98–109. DOI https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-02-2020-0008. 2020.

  96. Vacca, P., Caballero, D., Pastor, E., and Planas, E., WUI fire risk mitigation in Europe: A performance-based design approach at home-owner level, Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 97-105, ISSN 2666-4496, doi:10.1016/j.jnlssr.2020.08.001. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Mohan, A. T., Van Coile, R., Hopkin, D., Jomaas, G., & Caspeele, R. Risk Tolerability Limits for Fire Engineering Design: Methodology and Reference Case Study. Fire Technology, 57(5), 2235–2267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-021-01118-w. 2021.

  98. Meacham, B.J., Accommodating Innovation in Building Regulation: Lessons and Challenges, Building Research & Information, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Meacham, B.J., Fire Safety Engineering at a Crossroad, Case Studies in Fire Safety, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csfs.2013.11.001, 2013.

  100. Spinardi, G., Bisby, L. & Torero, J. A Review of Sociological Issues in Fire Safety Regulation. Fire Technology. 53, 1011–1037. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0615-1. 2017.

  101. Lange, David, Jose L. Torero, Andres Osorio, Nate Lobel, Cristian Maluk, Juan P. Hidalgo, Peter Johnson, Marianne Foley, and Ashley Brinson. “Identifying the Attributes of a Profession in the Practice and Regulation of Fire Safety Engineering.” Fire Safety Journal, 121 (May). doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103274. 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Fleischmann, C.M. Is Prescription the Future of Performance-Based Design? Proceedings - Fire Safety Science. https://firesafetyscience.org/publications/fss/10/77/view/fss_10-77.pdf. 2011.

  103. Trist, E. and Murray, H., Eds. The Social Engagement of Social Science, Volume 2: A Tavistock Anthology-The Socio-Technical Perspective, University of Pennsylvania Press. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Trist, E. “Introduction,” in Trist, E. and Murray, H., Eds. The Social Engagement of Social Science, Volume 2: A Tavistock Anthology--The Socio-Technical Perspective, University of Pennsylvania Press. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Meacham, B.J. and van Straalen, I., A Socio-Technical System Framework for Risk-Informed Performance-Based Building Regulation, Building Research & Information, DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1299525, 2017.

  106. Rasmussen, J. Risk Management in a Dynamic Society: A Modelling Problem. Safety Science. 1997:27(2/3):183-213.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Rasmussen, J. and Svedung, I. Proactive Risk Management in a Dynamic Society. Swedish Rescue Services Agency, Stockholm, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Leveson, N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science. 2004:42, 237-270.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Petak, W. Earthquake Resilience through Mitigation: A System Approach. Lecture paper. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, January 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Meacham, B.J., Stromgren, M. and van Hees, P. “A Holistic Framework for Development and Assessment of Risk-Informed Performance-Based Building Regulation,” Fire and Materials, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.2930, 2020.

  111. Rohracher, H. Managing the Technological Transition to Sustainable Construction of Buildings: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2001:13(1)137-150. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Harty, C. Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach. Building Research & Information. 2005:33:6, 512-522, DOI: 10.1080/09613210500288605. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Schweber, L. and Harty, C. Actors and Objects: a socio-technical networks approach to technology uptake in the construction sector. Construction Management and Economics. 2010:28(6):657-674, DOI: 10.1080/01446191003702468. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Guy, S., Marvin, S., Medd, W. and Moss, T. Shaping Urban Infrastructures: Intermediaries and the Governance of Socio-technical Networks, Earthscan, London. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Edwards, P. N. Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. Modernity and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 2003:185-225. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Hansman, R. J., Magee, C., De Neufville, R., & Robins, R.. Research agenda for an integrated approach to infrastructure planning, design and management. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures. 2006:2(2):146-159. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Ottens, M., Franssen, M., Kroes, P., & Van De Poel, I. Modelling infrastructures as socio-technical systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures. 2006:2(2):133-145. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Kroes, P., Franssen, M., Poel, I. V. D., & Ottens, M. Treating socio-technical systems as engineering systems: some conceptual problems. Systems Research and Behavioural Science. 2006: 23(6):803-814. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Jönsson, H., Johansson, J., & Johansson, H. Identifying critical components in technical infrastructure networks. Journal of Risk and Reliability. 2008:222(2):235-243. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Meacham, B.J. and Stromgren, M. A Review of the English and Swedish Building Regulatory Systems for Fire Safety using a Socio-Technical System (STS) Based Methodology, HOLIFAS Project WP 3 Report, Briab Brand & Riskingenjörerna AB (Sweden) and Meacham Associates (USA) Research Report 2019:01. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34702.72001. 2019.

  121. Rasmussen, J. The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-15(2), 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313353. 1985.

  122. Rasmussen, J., Vicente, K. Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 22 (4) (July/August). 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Leveson, N.G. Engineering a Safer World. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Leveson, N.G. Safety III: A Systems Approach to Safety and Resilience. MIT. Cambridge, MA. http://sunnyday.mit.edu/safety-3.pdf

  125. Cherns, A.B. The principles of sociotechnical design. Human Relations. 1976:29:783–792.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Torero, J., Lange, D., Horasan, M., Osorio, A., Maluk, C., Hidalgo, J. and Johnson, P. Current Status of Education, Training and Stated Competencies for Fire Safety Engineers. The Warren Centre for Advanced Engineering. University of Sydney. Australia. DOI:10.25910/a75g-gn88. https://hdl.handle.net/2123/23469. 2019.

  127. Bjelland, H. Engineering Safety with Applications to Fire Safety Design of Buildings and Road Tunnels, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, Norway, Stavanger, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Gehandler, J. Fire safety design of road tunnels. Lund University. Department of Fire Safety Engineering. Lund. Sweden. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester, UK: Wiley. 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Checkland, P. and Poulter, J. Soft Systems Methodology, Chapter 5, in M. Reynolds and S. Holwell (eds.), Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4_5, © The Open University 2010. Published in Association with Springer-Verlag London Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Checkland, P. Four Conditions for Serious Systems Thinking and Action, Systems Research and Behavioral Science Syst. Res. 29, 465–469, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2158, 2012.

  132. https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/risk-informed/history/2007-present.html

  133. NFPA 805. Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants. National fire Protection Association. Quincy. MA. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Perez, C. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  135. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3887767/understanding-gartner-s-hype-cycles

  136. Gartner Research’s Hype Cycle Diagram, Source: Jeremey Kemp, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gartner_Hype_Cycle.svg (CC BY-SA 3.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en)

  137. Steinert, M. and Leifer, L. Scrutinizing Gartner’s Hype Cycle Approach. PICMET 2010 Proceedings (2010 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology), IEEE, ISBN: 978-1-4244-8203-0, pp 254-265.

    Google Scholar 

  138. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 1 st Edition. DiNenno, P., Ed., Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Hamburger, R.O., Court, A.B. and Soulages, J.R. Vision 2000: A Framework for Performance-Based Engineering of Buildings. Proceedings of the 64 th Annual Convention. Structural Engineers Association of California. Pages 127-146. 19-21 October 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  140. King, J. and Perry, C., Smart Buildings: Using Smart Technology to Save Energy in Existing Buildings, Report A1701, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Lea P. Internet of Things for Architects: Architecting IoT solutions by implementing sensors, communication infrastructure, edge computing, analytics, and security. Packt Publishing Ltd. 2018

    Google Scholar 

  142. US DOE. Innovations in Sensors and Controls for Building Energy Management: Research and Development Opportunities Report for Emerging Technologies, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Office, Washington, DC, (https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/pdfs/75601.pdf). 2020.

  143. Cowlard A, Jahn W, Abecassis-Empis C, Rein G, Torero JL. Sensor Assisted Fire Fighting. Fire Technology. 2008;46:719-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-008-0069-1. 2008.

  144. Han, L., Potter, S., Beckett, G., Pringle, G., Welch, S., Koo, S-H., Wickler, G., Usmani, A., Torero, J. and Tate, A. (2010) FireGrid: An e-Infrastructure for Next-Generation Emergency Response Support, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 70 (2010) 1128-1141. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Su, L. C., Wu, X., Zhang, X., & Huang, X. Smart performance-based design for building fire safety: Prediction of smoke motion via AI. Journal of Building Engineering, 43, [102529]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102529. 2021.

  146. Wang, H., Dembsey, N.A., Meacham, B.J., Liu, S. and Simeoni, A. “Conceptual Design of a Building Fire Performance Monitoring Process,” Fire Technology, Manuscript FIRE-D-20-00271 (in review).

    Google Scholar 

  147. Wang, H., Dembsey, N.A., Meacham, B.J., Liu, S. and Simeoni, A. “A Sensitivity Matrix Method to Understand the Building Fire Egress Performance Gap,” Fire Safety Journal, Manuscript, (in review).

    Google Scholar 

  148. Meacham, B.J., Understanding Risk: Quantification, Perception and Characterization, Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.199-228, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Meacham, B.J., Johnson, P.J., Charters, D. and Salisbury, M., Building Fire Risk Analysis, Chapter 75, SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 5th Ed., Springer, USA, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Mossberg, A., Nilsson, D. & Andrée, K. Unannounced Evacuation Experiment in a High-Rise Hotel Building with Evacuation Elevators: A Study of Evacuation Behaviour Using Eye-Tracking. Fire Technol 57, 1259–1281. https://doi-org.ludwig.lub.lu.se/10.1007/s10694-020-01046-1. 2021.

  151. Galea, E.R., Xie, H., Deere, S., Cooney, D. and Filippidis, L. Evaluating the effectiveness of an improved active dynamic signage system using full scale evacuation trials. Fire Safety Journal, 91 (2017), pp. 908-917, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.022. 2017.

  152. Fu, M. and Liu, R. BIM-based automated determination of exit sign direction for intelligent building sign systems, Automation in Construction, Volume 120, 2020, 103353, ISSN 0926-5805, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103353. 2020.

  153. Naser, M.Z. Autonomous and resilient infrastructure with cognitive and self-deployable load-bearing structural components, Automation in Construction, Volume 99, Pages 59-67, ISSN 0926-5805, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.032. 2019.

  154. Naser, M.Z. Autonomous Fire Resistance Evaluation. Journal of Structural Engineering. Vol. 146. Issue 6. American Society of Civil Engineers. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002641. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  155. Building a Safer Future - Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety: Interim Report. Secretary of State for (Housing) Communities and Local Government, England. December 2017. (note – Housing was added in 2018, but used here for consistent style).

    Google Scholar 

  156. Building a Safer Future - Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety: Final Report. Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government, England. May 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Building a Safer Future – An Implementation Plan. Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, England. December 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Genco, G. Lacrosse Building Fire. Report. City of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 2015. https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/sitecollectiondocuments/mbs-report-lacrosse-fire.pdf

  159. Shergold, P. and Weir, B. Building Confidence: Improving the effectiveness of compliance and enforcement systems for the building and construction industry across Australia. Ministers Forum, Canberra, ACT, Australia. 2018. https://www.industry.gov.au/sites/default/files/July%202018/document/pdf/building_ministers_forum_expert_assessment_-_building_confidence.pdf

  160. Cheng, L. Judge finds architect proportionately liable for Lacrosse fire damages. ArchitectureAU. 2019. https://architectureau.com/articles/judge-finds-architect-proportionately-liable-for-lacrosse-fire-damages/

  161. Meacham, B.J. and McNamee, M. Fire Safety Challenges of ‘Green’ Buildings and Attributes, Fire Protection Research Foundation, Quincy, MA November 2020 (https://www.nfpa.org/~/media/Files/News%20and%20Research/Fire%20statistics%20and%20reports/Building%20and%20life%20safety/RFGreenBuildings2020.pdf, last accessed December 2020)

  162. Meacham, B.J. and McNamee, M. Handbook of Fire and the Environment: Impacts and Mitigation, Springer (April 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  163. Cornell, C.A., “Structural Safety: Some Historical Evidence that it is a Healthy Adolescent,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, Trondheim, Norway, June 1981, pp. 19-29.

    Google Scholar 

  164. Meacham, B.J. A Sociotechnical Systems Framework for Performance-Based Design for Fire Safety. Fire Technol (2022). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-022-01219-0

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author sincerely thanks Henrik Bjelland, Jonatan Gehandler and Nicholas Dembsey for their review and comments on this chapter and for their helpful comments. The author also gratefully acknowledges anonymous reviewer comments on the manuscript for [164], which reflects a shorter version of this chapter, and Springer Nature, for granting permission to republish [164] with enhancements and modifications as this chapter..

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Meacham Associates, Shrewsbury, MA, USA

    Brian J. Meacham

Authors
  1. Brian J. Meacham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. Meacham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA

    MZ Naser

  2. John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, USA

    Glenn Corbett

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meacham, B.J. (2022). Toward a Sociotechnical Systems Framing for Performance-Based Design for Fire Safety. In: Naser, M., Corbett, G. (eds) Handbook of Cognitive and Autonomous Systems for Fire Resilient Infrastructures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98685-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98685-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98684-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98685-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation