Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cooperate to Transform? Regional Cooperation in Community Supported Agriculture as a Driver of Resilient Local Food Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Alternative food networks (AFNs), and Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) in particular, are an example of sustainable farming practices. This paper focuses on regional cooperation and its consequences for food security by evaluating data from German field studies. Currently, the market share of CSA in Germany is marginal in absolute terms. However, there is great potential for increase as there is at least one CSA farm in almost every German region. The objective of this study is to assess the potential of CSA diffusion through regional cooperation and its impacts on the food sovereignty of a region. After elucidating the importance of food sovereignty as an indicator of food security and introducing the concept of CSA, we present an analytical framework for regional cooperation in CSA. Here we analyse (1) “Who cooperates?”, (2) “Why does cooperation occur?” and (3) “How does cooperation take place?”. Our special focus is on the phenomenon of community supported cooperation (CSC) as the most collaborative form of cooperation found within the CSA environment. Adopting a transdisciplinary approach, we consider the impacts of CSC on food production as well as on the overall resilience of a region using both theoretical tools and empirical sources. Finally, the differences and similarities as well as the replicability of regional cooperation in Germany are viewed in a global context by linking it to the numerous CSA projects worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The aim to create a café ambience for an open but intimate discussion is what gives the “world café” method its name. It is a participatory approach that "accesses the views and knowledge present within a larger group of people" (Löhr et al. 2020: 1).

  2. 2.

    One conference of the formal German rural development organization dvs (Deutsche Vernetzungsstelle Ländliche Räume) and another conference of the non-formal actor CSX network, which seeks to transfer CSA ideas to other business sectors.

  3. 3.

    Being a multifunctional actor, CSAs’ value chains incorporate not only food but also other “products”, such as education, as when CSAs intentionally serve as a place of learning. In this case, schools or other educational institutions can also be regarded as regional partners in the value chain.

References

  • Antoni-Komar I, Lenz C (2021) Transformative communities in Germany: working towards a sustainable food supply through creative doing and collaboration. In: Kropp C, Antoni-Komar I, Sage C (eds) Food system transformations: social movements, local economies, collaborative networks. Routledge, London, pp 141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbera F, Dagnes J (2016) Building alternatives from the bottom-up: the case of alternative food networks. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 8:324–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Blättel B, Boddenberg M, Gunkel L, Schmitz S, Vaessen F (2017) Beyond the market-new practices of supply in times of crisis: the example community-supported agriculture. Int J Consum Stud 41:415–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloemmen M, Bobulescu R, Le NT, Vitari C (2015) Microeconomic degrowth: the case of community supported agriculture. Ecol Econ 112:110–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogner A, Littig B, Menz W (2009) Interviewing experts. Research methods series. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood Press, New York, pp 241–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm JM, Eisenhauer BW (2008) Motivations for participating in community-supported agriculture and their relationship with community attachment und social capital. Southern Rural Sociology 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson LA, Bitsch V (2019) Applicability of transaction cost economics to understanding organizational structures in solidarity-based food systems in Germany. Sustainability 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Che D, Veeck A, Veeck G (2005) Sustaining production and strengthening the agritourism product: linkages among Michigan agritourism destinations. Agric Human Values 22:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciliberti S, Frascarelli A, Martino G (2020) Drivers of participation in collective arrangements in the agri-food supply chain. Evidence from Italy using a transaction costs economics perspective. Annals Public Coop Econ 91:387–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp J, Scrinis G (2017) big food, nutritionism, and corporate power. Globalizations 14:578–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen B (2006) Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Bus Strateg Environ 15:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska B (2014) Social science research: from field to desk. SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev Apr 147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • European CSA Research Group (ed) (2016) Overview of community supported agriculture in Europe

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2001) Commission notice: guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to horizontal cooperation agreements. (2001/C 3/02)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora CB, Bregendahl C (2012) Collaborative Community-supported agriculture: balancing community capitals for producers and consumers. Int J Sociol Agric Food 19:329–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Forssell S, Lankoski L (2015) The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: an examination through “alternative” characteristics. Agric Hum Values 32:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galt RE, Bradley K, Christensen L, van Soelen KJ, Lobo R (2016) Eroding the community in community supported agriculture (CSA): competition’s effects in alternative food networks in California. Sociol Rural 56:491–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galt RE, Bradley K, Christensen LO, Munden K (2019) The (un)making of “CSA people”: member retention and the customization paradox in community supported agriculture (CSA) in California. J Rural Stud 65:172–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Galt ER, O’Sullivan L, Beckett J, Myles C (2012) Community supported agriculture is thriving in the central valley. California Agric 8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31:1257–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Assembly of the UN (2015) 70/1 Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 Sept 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Groh T, McFadden S (eds) (1997) Farms of tomorrow revisited: community supported farms, farm supported communities. Biodynamic Farming and Gardening Association, Kimberton, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs CC (2000) Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural market. J Rural Stud 16:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ: Transdisciplinary J Int Soc Ecol Econ 79:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondoh K (2015) The alternative food movement in Japan: challenges, limits, and resilience of the teikei system. Agric Human Values 32:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koretskaya O, Feola G (2020) A framework for recognizing diversity beyond capitalism in agri-food systems. J Rural Stud 80:302–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotschi J, Doobe L, Schrimpf B (2020) Enabling diversity: ways to finance organic plant breeding. AGRECOL Association, Guggenhausen

    Google Scholar 

  • Krcilkova S, Perényi Z, Winter J, Valeška J, Parot J, Volz P, Haraszti A, Strüber K, Gruber C (2019) Solid base: supporting booklet for training on the financial sustainability of Solidarity-based food systems. Urgenci

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropp C, Antoni-Komar I, Sage C (eds) (2021) Food system transformations: social movements, local economies, collaborative networks. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamine C (2015) Sustainability and resilience in agrifood systems: reconnecting agriculture, food and the environment. Sociol Rural 55:41–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levkoe CZ, Brem J, Anderson CR (2019) People, power, change: three pillars of a food sovereignty research praxis. J Peasant Stud 46:1389–1412

    Google Scholar 

  • Löhr K, Weinhardt M, Sieber S (2020) The “World Café” as a participatory method for collecting qualitative data. Int J Qual Methods 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach D (2004) Governance and transitions: a multi-level policy-framework based on complex systems thinking. conference on human dimensions of global environmental change. Berlin. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/ffu/akumwelt/bc2004/download/loorbach_f.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2021

  • Loorbach D (2010) Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23:161–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mars MM (2020) Inter-organizational dynamics and the ecology of localized entrepreneurship. Community Dev 51:53–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mars MM, Schau HJ (2017) Institutional entrepreneurship and the negotiation and blending of multiple logics in the Southern Arizona local food system. Agric Hum Values 34:407–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matopoulos A, Vlachopoulou M, Manthou V, Manos B (2007) A conceptual framework for supply chain collaboration: empirical evidence from the agri-food industry. Supp Chain Manage 12:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzembacher DE, Meira FB (2019) Sustainability as business strategy in community supported agriculture. British Food J 121:616–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller C, McCole D (2014) Understanding collaboration among farmers and farmers' market managers in Southeast Michigan (USA). J Agric Food Syst Community Dev:71–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal A, White VM, Krejci C (2017) A framework for collaboration among regional food system participants. In: Industrial and manufacturing systems engineering conference proceedings and posters p 107

    Google Scholar 

  • Netzwerk Solidarische Landwirtschaft (2021) Bestehende Solawis und Solawis i.G. https://www.solidarische-landwirtschaft.org/solawis-finden/auflistung/solawis. Accessed 1 April 2021

  • Opitz I, Specht K, Piorr A, Siebert R, Zasada I (2017) Effects of consumer-producer interactions in alternative food networks on consumers’ learning about food and agriculture. Moravian Geogr Rep 25:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opitz I, Zoll F, Zasada I, Doernberg A, Siebert R, Piorr A (2019) Consumer-producer interactions in community-supported agriculture and their relevance for economic stability of the farm—an empirical study using an analytic hierarchy process. J Rural Stud 68:22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paech N, Sperling C, Rommel M (2021) Cost effects of local food enterprises: supply chains, transaction costs and social diffusion. In: Kropp C, Antoni-Komar I, Sage C (eds) Food system transformations: social movements, local economies, collaborative networks. Routledge, London, pp 119–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research & evaluation methods. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry J, Franzblau S (2010) Local Harvest: a Multifarm CSA Handbook. Signature book Printing, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips N, Lawrence TB, Hardy C (2000) Inter‐organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. J Manage Stud 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Poore J, Nemecek T (2018) Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360:987–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations. Social science. Free Press, New York, London, Toronto, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommel M, Paech N, Sperling C (2019) Eine Ökonomie der Nähe. Horizontale Ausbreitung resilienter Versorgungsmuster. In: Antoni-Komar I, Kropp C, Paech N, Pfriem R (eds) Transformative Unternehmen und die Wende in der Ernährungswirtschaft, 1st edn. Metropolis, Marburg, pp 361–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage C (2014) The transition movement and food sovereignty: from local resilience to global engagement in food system transformation. J Consum Cult 14:254–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samoggia A, Perazzolo C, Kocsis P, Del Prete M (2019) Community supported agriculture farmers’ perceptions of management benefits and drawbacks. Sustainability 11:3262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäpke N, Bergmann M, Stelzer F, Lang DJ, Editors G (2018) Labs in the Real World: advancing transdisciplinary research and sustainability transformation: mapping the field and emerging lines of inquiry. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma G (2017) Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. Int J Appl Res 3:749–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2021) Strukturwandel in der Landwirtschaft hält an 21 Jan 2021, 28th edn., Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn L, Kneafsey M, Holloway L, Cox R, Dowler E, Tuomainen H (2006) Researching European ‘alternative’ food networks: some methodological considerations. Area 38:248–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt RA, Kaiser LL (2008) Still a time to act: a review of institutional marketing of regionally-grown food. Agric Hum Values 25:241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E, McDermott RA, Snyder W (2002) Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1991) Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strat Mgmt J 12:75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman D, Desmarais AA, Wiebe N (2010) The Origins & Potential of Food Sovereignty. In: Wittman H, Desmarais AA, Wiebe N (eds) Food sovereignty: reconnecting food, nature & community, 1st edn. Fernwood Publishing, Halifax, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods T, Ernst M, Tropp D (2017) Community supported agriculture: new models for changing markets. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Worstell J (2020) Ecological resilience of food systems in response to the COVID-19 Crisis. J Agric Food Syst Commun Dev:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Young S (2013) Transaction Cost Economics. In: Idowu SO, Capaldi N, Zu L, Gupta AD (eds) Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 2497–2587

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economic Disciplines | Pluralist Economics, Research Project Nascent, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany

    Marius Rommel, Dirk Posse, Moritz Wittkamp & Niko Paech

Authors
  1. Marius Rommel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dirk Posse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Moritz Wittkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Niko Paech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Posse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hamburg University of Applied Sciences and Manchester Metropolitan University, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

  2. FTZ-ALS, HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Marina Kovaleva

  3. Department of Economic Policy and Public-Private Partnership, Moscow State Institute of International, Moscow, Russia

    Elena Popkova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rommel, M., Posse, D., Wittkamp, M., Paech, N. (2022). Cooperate to Transform? Regional Cooperation in Community Supported Agriculture as a Driver of Resilient Local Food Systems. In: Leal Filho, W., Kovaleva, M., Popkova, E. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98617-9_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation