Abstract
Urban innovation performance is the main driving force behind sustained economic growth. There have been many attempts to quantify innovation performance in order to guide decision-making, promoting investment and innovation projects. Most studies do not accurately describe innovation in terms of how knowledge-intensive activities develop over multiple phases, how they are distributed geographically, and the ways in which agglomerated urban innovation efforts can enhance economic growth. Primarily, they fail to effectively combine urban practice and economic findings through data science efforts to design quantitative innovation performance metrics. This paper presents a novel database and analytical methodology to measure and describe the nonlinear benefits of geographic aggregation of knowledge-intensive activities within urban environments. The results of this research empirically demonstrate that innovation districts, characterized by their geographic concentration of knowledge-intensive activities, benefit from the superlinear growth of innovation, both in terms of innovation output per employee (new patents, new products, new services, R&D, scientific papers) and in terms of innovation-related employment creation per resident. The geospatial, analytical framework has been applied to the study of 50 notable Innovation Districts to benchmark them against a baseline of all districts in the United States. We have extracted the most salient features of these districts that illustrate the value of investing in the geographic concentration of innovation activities. The analytical framework can then be applied to any geographical area to evaluate the economic performance of knowledge-intensive activities within urban environments. The work expands on general knowledge of how cities operate as complex systems and how they shape the collective knowhow of urban communities. Further research may identify the key factors, features, and dynamics underlying the success of innovation districts, such as urban design criteria and smart specialization strategies, and apply them to specific communities to support the economic growth of urban environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Change history
11 September 2022
Chapter 15 in: C. Piselli et al. (eds.), Innovating Strategies and Solutions for Urban Performance and Regeneration, Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98187-7_15
References
Alonso, L., Doorley, R., Elkhatsa, M., Grignard, A., Noyman, A., Larson, K., Sakai, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018): CityScope: A data-driven interactive simulation tool for urban design. Use case: Volpe Center.
Arbesman, S., Kleinberg, J. M., & Strogatz, S. H. (2009). Superlinear scaling for innovation in cities. Physical Review E, 79, 016115.
Barabási, A. L. (2016). Network science: The scale free property. Retrieved from: https://barabasi.com/f/623.pdf
Barabási, A. L. (2017). The elegant law that governs us all. Science, 357(6347), 138.
Bertaud, A., & Malpezzi, S. (2003): The spatial distribution of population in 48 world cities: Implications for economies in transition.
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, Helbing, D., Kühnert, C., & West, G. B. (2006). Growth, innovation, scaling and the pace of life in cities. PNAS, 104(17), 7301–7306. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610172104
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., & Strumsky, D. (2007). Invention in the city: Increasing returns to scale in metropolitan patenting. Research Policy, 36(1), 107–120. ISSN 0048-7333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.026
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., & West, G. B. (2008). Why are large cities faster? Universal scaling and self-similarity in urban organization and dynamics. The European Physical Journal B., 63, 285–293.
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., & West, G. B. (2009). The self similarity of human social organization and dynamics in cities. In D. Lane, D. Pumain, S. E. van der Leeuw, & G. West (Eds.), Complexity perspectives in innovation and social change. Springer.
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Strumsky, D., & West, G. B. (2010). Urban scaling and its deviations: Revealing the structure of wealth, innovation and crime across cities. PLoS ONE, 5(11), e13541.
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Strumsky, D., & West G. B. (2013). Urban scaling and the production function for cities. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e58407.
Ellison, G., & Glaeser, E. (2009). The geographic concentration of industry: Does natural advantage explain agglomeration? American Economic Review.
Ekmekci, O., Kalvo, R., & Sevtsuk, A. (2016). Pedestrian accessibility in grid layouts: The role of block, plot and street dimensions. Urban Morphology, 20.
Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes, A., & Yildirim, M. A. (2014). The Atlas of economic complexity. Mapping paths to prosperity. MIT Press.
Hartmann, D., Guevara, M. R., Jara Figueroa, C., Aristarán, M., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2017). Linking economic complexity, institutions, and income inequality. World Development, 93, 75–93.
Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. PNAS. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10570–10575.
Katz, B., & Wagner, J. (2014). The rise of urban innovation districts. Harvard Business Review.
Kühnert, C., Helbing, D., & West, G. B. (2006). Scaling laws in urban supply networks. Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 363(1), 96–103.
Lane, D., Pumain, S., van der Leeuw, S. E., & West, G. B. (2009). Power laws in urban supply networks, social systems, and dense pedestrian crowds. Complexity perspectives in innovation and social change. Springer.
Moretti, E. (2012). The new geography of jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Schläpfer, M., Bettencourt, L. M., Grauwin, S., Raschke, M., Claxton, R., Smoreda, Z., West, J., & Ratti, C. (2014). The scaling of human interactions with city size. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11(98), 20130789.
Smith, A. (1776). The wealth of nations.
Youn, H., Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Strumsky, D., Samaniego, H., & West, G. B. (2016). The systematic structure and predictability of urban business diversity. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 13. arXiv:1405.3202v1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Burke, J., Gras Alomà, R., Yu, F. (2022). Multiplying Effects of Urban Innovation Districts. Geospatial Analysis Framework for Evaluating Innovation Performance Within Urban Environments. In: Piselli, C., Altan, H., Balaban, O., Kremer, P. (eds) Innovating Strategies and Solutions for Urban Performance and Regeneration. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98187-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98187-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98186-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98187-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)