Skip to main content

High School Students’ Causal Reasoning and Molecular Mechanistic Reasoning About Gene-Environment Interplay After a Semester-Long Course in Genetics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fostering Understanding of Complex Systems in Biology Education

Abstract

This study provides insights into high school students’ (n = 47, age: 16–17 years) molecular mechanistic reasoning about gene-environment interplay. Analyses distinguished between causal and mechanistic reasoning and focused on three interrelated molecular mechanisms of gene-environment interplay. As a main finding, few high school students showed molecular mechanistic reasoning about the environment (13%) and gene-environment interplay (13%) because the genetic and environmental mechanisms had to be inferred from the materials. In contrast, most students focused on information presented in the materials, which they reproduced for causal reasoning about food (21%), mechanistic reasoning about the biochemical pathway (11%), and an unintegrated (23%) or integrated combination (17%) of both types of reasoning. Furthermore, we interviewed a subgroup of seven students about the gene-environment interplay model of trait formation to validate our interpretations. The model visualizes relationships between gene, gene product, trait and environment. Students’ fragmented knowledge of gene-environment interplay rendered use of the model difficult for mechanistic reasoning because students rarely acknowledged enzymes as mediators between genes and traits and the role of proteins in trait formation. We discuss “tracing trait formation” as a teaching learning strategy and recommend using the gene-environment interplay model of trait formation for implementing this strategy in the classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aivelo, T., & Uitto, A. (2015). Genetic determinism in the Finnish upper secondary school biology textbooks. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 11(2), 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, F. K. (2018). Nature vs. nurture is nonsense: On the necessity of an integrated genetic, social, developmental, and personality psychology. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71, 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. (2016). Gene-environment interplay. Science, 354(6308), 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boerwinkel, D. J., Yarden, A., & Waarlo, A. J. (2017). Reaching a consensus on the definition of genetic literacy that is required from a twenty-first-century citizen. Science & Education, 26, 1087–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, R. B., Castera, J., Gericke, N., Evangelista, N. A. M., & El-Hani, C. N. (2017). Young Adults’ belief in genetic determinism, and knowledge and attitudes towards modern genetics and genomics: The PUGGS questionnaire. PLoS One, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C. F., & Darden, L. (2013). In search of mechanisms: Discoveries across the life sciences. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, M. J. (2009). Closing the gap: Inverting the genetics curriculum to ensure an informed public. American Journal of Human Genetics, 85(1), 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, M. J., Pleasants, C., Solow, L., Wong, A., & Zhang, H. (2011). A comprehensive analysis of high school genetics standards: Are states keeping pace with modern genetics? CBE – Life Science Education, 10, 318–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students’ understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 938–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students’ understanding of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gericke, N., & Wahlberg, S. (2013). Clusters of concepts in molecular genetics: A study of Swedish upper secondary science students understanding. Journal of Biological Education, 47, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldén, O. (1988). The evolution of the species: Pupil perspectives and school perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 10(5), 541–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammann, M., Heemann, T., & Zang, J. (2021). Why does multiple and interactive causation render comprehension of genetic phenomena difficult and what could genetics educators do about it? In M. Haskel-Ittah & A. Yarden (Eds.), Genetics education: Current challenges and possible solutions. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskel-Ittah, M., & Yarden, A. (2017). Toward bridging the mechanistic gap between genes and traits by emphasizing the role of proteins in a computational environment. Science & Education, 16, 183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskel-Ittah, M., & Yarden, A. (2018). Students’ conception of genetic phenomena and its effect on their ability to understand the underlying mechanism. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 17, ar36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausfeld, R., & Schulenberg, W. (2015). BIOskop (Nordrhein-Westfalen, S II, Dr. A). Westermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heemann, T., & Hammann, M. (2020). Toward teaching for an integrated understanding of trait formation: An analysis of genetics tasks in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 54(2), 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, M. A., Cline, R. J., & Trepanier, A. M. (2014). Reaching future scientists, consumers, & citizens: What do secondary school textbooks say about genomics & its impact on health? The American Biology Teacher, 76(6), 379–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, A., & Radick, G. (2017). Genetic determinism in the genetics curriculum. Science & Education, 26, 1261–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K. (2017). Making sense of genes. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knippels, M.-C. P. J., & Waarlo, A. J. (2018). Development, uptake, and wider applicability of the Yo-yo strategy in biology education research: A reappraisal. Education Sciences, 8(3), 129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., & Kattmann, U. (2004). Traits, genes, particles and information: Re-visiting students’ understandings of genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000). Students’ cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 200–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Gracia, M. V., Gil-Quílez, M. J., & Osada, J. (2006). Analysis of molecular genetics content in Spanish secondary school textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElhinny, T. L., Dougherty, M. J., Bowling, B. V., & Libarkin, J. C. (2014). The status of genetics curriculum in higher education in the United States: Goals and assessment. Science & Education, 23(2), 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S. (2015). The developing genome: An introduction to behavioral epigenetics. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova, I., & Kreher, S. (2013). Missing links in genes to traits. The American Biology Teacher, 75, 641–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinagel, A., & Bray Speth, E. (2016). Beyond the central dogma: Model-based learning of how genes determine phenotypes. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 15, ar4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., Mandl, H., & Gruber, H. (1994). Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ, R. S., Scherr, R. E., Hammer, D., & Mikeska, J. (2008). Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science. Science Education, 92(3), 499–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (2006). Genes and behavior: Nature-nurture interplay explained. Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southard, K., Wince, T., Meddleton, S., & Bolger, M. S. (2016). Features of knowledge building in biology: Understanding undergraduate Students’ ideas about molecular mechanisms. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 15, ar7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streumer, B. (2007). Inferential and non-inferential reasoning. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabery, J. (2014). Beyond versus: The struggle to understand the interaction of nature and nurture. The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thörne, K., & Gericke, N. (2014). Teaching genetics in secondary classrooms: A linguistic analysis of teachers’ talk about proteins. Research in Science Education, 44, 81–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1031–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Hammann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hammann, M., Brandt, S. (2022). High School Students’ Causal Reasoning and Molecular Mechanistic Reasoning About Gene-Environment Interplay After a Semester-Long Course in Genetics. In: Ben Zvi Assaraf, O., Knippels, MC.P.J. (eds) Fostering Understanding of Complex Systems in Biology Education. Contributions from Biology Education Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98144-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98144-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98143-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98144-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics