Abstract
This study provides insights into high school students’ (n = 47, age: 16–17 years) molecular mechanistic reasoning about gene-environment interplay. Analyses distinguished between causal and mechanistic reasoning and focused on three interrelated molecular mechanisms of gene-environment interplay. As a main finding, few high school students showed molecular mechanistic reasoning about the environment (13%) and gene-environment interplay (13%) because the genetic and environmental mechanisms had to be inferred from the materials. In contrast, most students focused on information presented in the materials, which they reproduced for causal reasoning about food (21%), mechanistic reasoning about the biochemical pathway (11%), and an unintegrated (23%) or integrated combination (17%) of both types of reasoning. Furthermore, we interviewed a subgroup of seven students about the gene-environment interplay model of trait formation to validate our interpretations. The model visualizes relationships between gene, gene product, trait and environment. Students’ fragmented knowledge of gene-environment interplay rendered use of the model difficult for mechanistic reasoning because students rarely acknowledged enzymes as mediators between genes and traits and the role of proteins in trait formation. We discuss “tracing trait formation” as a teaching learning strategy and recommend using the gene-environment interplay model of trait formation for implementing this strategy in the classroom.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aivelo, T., & Uitto, A. (2015). Genetic determinism in the Finnish upper secondary school biology textbooks. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 11(2), 139–152.
Barlow, F. K. (2018). Nature vs. nurture is nonsense: On the necessity of an integrated genetic, social, developmental, and personality psychology. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71, 68–79.
Berg, J. (2016). Gene-environment interplay. Science, 354(6308), 15.
Boerwinkel, D. J., Yarden, A., & Waarlo, A. J. (2017). Reaching a consensus on the definition of genetic literacy that is required from a twenty-first-century citizen. Science & Education, 26, 1087–1114.
Carver, R. B., Castera, J., Gericke, N., Evangelista, N. A. M., & El-Hani, C. N. (2017). Young Adults’ belief in genetic determinism, and knowledge and attitudes towards modern genetics and genomics: The PUGGS questionnaire. PLoS One, 12.
Craver, C. F., & Darden, L. (2013). In search of mechanisms: Discoveries across the life sciences. University of Chicago Press.
Dougherty, M. J. (2009). Closing the gap: Inverting the genetics curriculum to ensure an informed public. American Journal of Human Genetics, 85(1), 6–12.
Dougherty, M. J., Pleasants, C., Solow, L., Wong, A., & Zhang, H. (2011). A comprehensive analysis of high school genetics standards: Are states keeping pace with modern genetics? CBE – Life Science Education, 10, 318–327.
Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students’ understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 938–959.
Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students’ understanding of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655–674.
Gericke, N., & Wahlberg, S. (2013). Clusters of concepts in molecular genetics: A study of Swedish upper secondary science students understanding. Journal of Biological Education, 47, 73–83.
Halldén, O. (1988). The evolution of the species: Pupil perspectives and school perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 10(5), 541–552.
Hammann, M., Heemann, T., & Zang, J. (2021). Why does multiple and interactive causation render comprehension of genetic phenomena difficult and what could genetics educators do about it? In M. Haskel-Ittah & A. Yarden (Eds.), Genetics education: Current challenges and possible solutions. Springer.
Haskel-Ittah, M., & Yarden, A. (2017). Toward bridging the mechanistic gap between genes and traits by emphasizing the role of proteins in a computational environment. Science & Education, 16, 183.
Haskel-Ittah, M., & Yarden, A. (2018). Students’ conception of genetic phenomena and its effect on their ability to understand the underlying mechanism. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 17, ar36.
Hausfeld, R., & Schulenberg, W. (2015). BIOskop (Nordrhein-Westfalen, S II, Dr. A). Westermann.
Heemann, T., & Hammann, M. (2020). Toward teaching for an integrated understanding of trait formation: An analysis of genetics tasks in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 54(2), 191–201.
Hicks, M. A., Cline, R. J., & Trepanier, A. M. (2014). Reaching future scientists, consumers, & citizens: What do secondary school textbooks say about genomics & its impact on health? The American Biology Teacher, 76(6), 379–383.
Jamieson, A., & Radick, G. (2017). Genetic determinism in the genetics curriculum. Science & Education, 26, 1261–1290.
Kampourakis, K. (2017). Making sense of genes. Cambridge University Press.
Knippels, M.-C. P. J., & Waarlo, A. J. (2018). Development, uptake, and wider applicability of the Yo-yo strategy in biology education research: A reappraisal. Education Sciences, 8(3), 129.
Lewis, J., & Kattmann, U. (2004). Traits, genes, particles and information: Re-visiting students’ understandings of genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 195–206.
Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–25.
Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000). Students’ cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 200–205.
Martínez-Gracia, M. V., Gil-Quílez, M. J., & Osada, J. (2006). Analysis of molecular genetics content in Spanish secondary school textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 53–60.
McElhinny, T. L., Dougherty, M. J., Bowling, B. V., & Libarkin, J. C. (2014). The status of genetics curriculum in higher education in the United States: Goals and assessment. Science & Education, 23(2), 445–464.
Moore, D. S. (2015). The developing genome: An introduction to behavioral epigenetics. Oxford University Press.
Pavlova, I., & Kreher, S. (2013). Missing links in genes to traits. The American Biology Teacher, 75, 641–649.
Reinagel, A., & Bray Speth, E. (2016). Beyond the central dogma: Model-based learning of how genes determine phenotypes. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 15, ar4.
Renkl, A., Mandl, H., & Gruber, H. (1994). Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 115–121.
Russ, R. S., Scherr, R. E., Hammer, D., & Mikeska, J. (2008). Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science. Science Education, 92(3), 499–525.
Rutter, M. (2006). Genes and behavior: Nature-nurture interplay explained. Blackwell Publishing.
Southard, K., Wince, T., Meddleton, S., & Bolger, M. S. (2016). Features of knowledge building in biology: Understanding undergraduate Students’ ideas about molecular mechanisms. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 15, ar7.
Streumer, B. (2007). Inferential and non-inferential reasoning. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74(1), 1–29.
Tabery, J. (2014). Beyond versus: The struggle to understand the interaction of nature and nurture. The MIT Press.
Thörne, K., & Gericke, N. (2014). Teaching genetics in secondary classrooms: A linguistic analysis of teachers’ talk about proteins. Research in Science Education, 44, 81–108.
Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1031–1055.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hammann, M., Brandt, S. (2022). High School Students’ Causal Reasoning and Molecular Mechanistic Reasoning About Gene-Environment Interplay After a Semester-Long Course in Genetics. In: Ben Zvi Assaraf, O., Knippels, MC.P.J. (eds) Fostering Understanding of Complex Systems in Biology Education. Contributions from Biology Education Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98144-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98144-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98143-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98144-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)