Skip to main content
Book cover

Geoethics pp 55–61Cite as

Ethical Problems and Dilemmas in the Geosciences

  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

Any decision may be made impulsively or may mature after weighing up a range of possibilities. Deciding what is the right or acceptable thing to do in a situation open to multiple solutions implies in the simplest cases choosing between two or more alternatives, one of which is the best.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-98044-3_6
  • Chapter length: 7 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-98044-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Albarello, D. (2015). Communicating uncertainty: Managing the inherent probabilistic character of hazard estimates. In S. Peppoloni & G. Di Capua (Eds.), Geoethics—The role and responsibility of geoscientists (Special Publications 419, pp. 111–116). Geological Society of London. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP419.9

  • Amato, A., Cerase, A., & Galadini, F. (Eds.). (2015). Terremoti, comunicazione, diritto: riflessioni sul processo alla “Commissione Grandi Rischi” (p. 376). FrancoAngeli. ISBN 978-8891712714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitidis, N., Boon, J., Nurmi, P., & Di Capua, G. (2017). White paper on responsible mining. IAPG—International Association for Promoting Geoethics. http://www.geoethics.org/wp-responsible-mining. Accessed 29 March 2022.

  • Bilham, R. (2015). Mmax: Ethics of the maximum credible earthquake. In M. Wyss & S. Peppoloni (Eds.), Geoethics: Ethical challenges and case studies in earth sciences (pp. 119–140). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799935-7.00011-3

  • Bobrowsky, P., Cronin, V., Di Capua, G., Kieffer, S. W., & Peppoloni, S. (2017). The emerging field of geoethics. In L. C. Gundersen (Ed.), Scientific integrity and ethics: With applications to the geosciences (Special Publications 73, pp. 175–212). American Geophysical Union. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119067825.ch11

  • Cocco, M., Cultrera, G., Amato, A., & Braun, T. (2015). The L’Aquila Trial. In S. Peppoloni & G. Di Capua (Eds.), Geoethics—The role and responsibility of geoscientists (Special Publications 419, pp. 43–55). Geological Society of London. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP419.13

  • Elster, J. (2009). Interpretation and rational choice. Rationality and Society, 21(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463108099347

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, P. (2014). Policy: The art of science advice to government. Nature, 507(7491), 163–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/507163a

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hostettler, D. (2015). Mining in indigenous regions: The case of Tampakan, Philippines. In M. Wyss & S. Peppoloni (Eds.), Geoethics: Ethical challenges and case studies in earth sciences (pp. 371–380). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799935-7.00030-7

  • Lerer, L. B., & Scudder, T. (1999). Health impacts of large dams. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 19(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00041-9

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, P. H., & Norman, D. A. (1972). Human information processing: An introduction to psychology (p. 800). Academic Press Inc. ISBN 978–0124509320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marone, E., & Peppoloni, S. (2017). Ethical dilemmas in geosciences. We can ask, but, can we answer? Annals of Geophysics, 60, Fast Track 7: Geoethics at the heart of all geoscience. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7445

  • Ovadia, D., & Bilham, N. (2018). Geoethics—What do you think? Geoscientist—The Fellowship Magazine of the Geological Society of London, 28(3), 7–8. https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/~/~/media/shared/documents/geoscientist/2018/Geo_APRIL2018_WR.pdf. Accessed 29 March 2022.

  • Owen, J. R., & Kemp, D. (2013). Social licence and mining: A critical perspective. Resources Policy, 38(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.016

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peppoloni, S., Bilham, N., & Di Capua, G. (2019). Contemporary geoethics within the geosciences. In M. Bohle (Ed.), Exploring geoethics—Ethical implications, societal contexts, and professional obligations of the geosciences (pp. 25–70). Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12010-8_2

  • Peppoloni, S., & Di Capua, G. (2018). Ethics. In P. T. Bobrowsky & B. Marker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of engineering geology. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12127-7_115-1

  • Pölzler, T., & Ortner, F. (2017). Ethical but upsetting geoscience research: A case study. Annals of Geophysics, 60, Fast Track 7: Geoethics at the heart of all geoscience. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7506

  • Potthast, T. (2015). Toward an inclusive geoethics—Commonalities of ethics in technology, science, business, and environment. In M. Wyss & S. Peppoloni (Eds.), Geoethics: Ethical challenges and case studies in earth sciences (pp. 49–56). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799935-7.00005-8

  • Reynolds, I. (2011). Impact of the three gorges dam. JCCC Honors Journal, 2(2), 3. http://scholarspace.jccc.edu/honors_journal/vol2/iss2/3. Accessed 29 March 2022.

  • Schmutz, S., & Moog, O. (2018). Dams: Ecological impacts and management. In S. Schmutz & J. Sendzimir (Eds.), Riverine ecosystem management. Aquatic Ecology, Series 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73250-3_6

  • Simon, H. A. (1985). Causalità, razionalità, organizzazione (p. 416). Il Mulino. ISBN 978-8815009340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. (2013). An introduction to Gödel’s Theorems (2nd ed., Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy, p. 404). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1139149105. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139149105

  • Stefanovic, I. L. (2015). Geoethics: Reenvisioning applied philosophy. In M. Wyss & S. Peppoloni (Eds.), Geoethics: Ethical challenges and case studies in earth sciences (pp. 15–23) Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799935-7.00002-2

  • Tibaldi, S. (2013). Catena di responsabilità e catena decisionale: problemi irrisolti. Incontro-Dibattito “Cosa non funziona nella difesa dal rischio idrogeologico nel nostro paese? Analisi e rimedi”, Roma, 23 marzo 2012. Atti dei Convegni Lincei, 270, 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinti, S., Armigliato, A., Pagnoni, G., & Zaniboni, F. (2015). Geoethical and social aspects of warning for low-frequency and large-impact events like Tsunamis. In M. Wyss & S. Peppoloni (Eds.), Geoethics: Ethical challenges and case studies in earth sciences (pp. 175–192). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799935-7.00015-0

  • Tortajada, C., Altinbilek, D., & Biswas, A. K. (2012). Impacts of large dams: A global assessment (p. XIV+410). Springer. ISBN 978-3642235702. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23571-9

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Silvia Peppoloni or Giuseppe Di Capua .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Peppoloni, S., Di Capua, G. (2022). Ethical Problems and Dilemmas in the Geosciences. In: Geoethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98044-3_6

Download citation