Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Building on Smart Cities Skills and Competences pp 169–183Cite as

Modeling Project Management Complexity in Smart Cities’ Projects

  • 382 Accesses

Part of the Internet of Things book series (ITTCC)

Abstract

Smart city is a relatively new form of city that increasingly gains popularity and is considered as the way modern cities will achieve sustainable growth, service efficiency, and the well-being of their citizens. This transformation is a complex process that is implemented through projects that are usually an inherited complex. This research proposes a 12-dimensional complexity model with 45 corresponding metrics for assessing the complexity of smart cities’ projects based on project management aspects, technical characteristics of software (IT) development, and special characteristics of smart cities’ projects aiming to help project managers to deal with project complexity and hence to increase the possibilities for project success which will bring one step closer the “smart” transition of the city.

Keywords

  • Smart cities
  • Smart cities’ project complexity
  • Project complexity
  • Complexity assessment model
  • Complexity metrics

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    SmartDevOps project w1ebsite is https://smartdevops.eu

References

  • Alshahadeh, T., & Marsap, A. (2018). Smart cities, smarter management: Developing a smart framework for smart city projects management in Europe. Ge-International Journal of Management Research, 6(9), 41–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, M. N., & Dilan, E. (2017). Project management method adoption: A service industry case study. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management, 8(2), 17–33.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity—A review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201–204.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, T., & Karwowski, W. (2019). Agile project management and project success: A literature review. In J. I. Kantola, S. Nazir, & T. Barath (Eds.), Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Society. AHFE 2018 (pp. 405–414). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., & Verbraeck, A. (2011). Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (technical, organizational and environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 728–739.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. (2016). A framework for examining the dimensions and characteristics of complexity inherent within rail megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(6), 937–956.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii international conference on system science (HICSS), Maui, HI, 4–7 January 2012 (pp. 2289–2297). IEEE.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke-Davies, T., Cicmil, S., Crawford, L., & Richardson, K. (2007). We’re not in Kansas anymore, Toto: Mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management. Project Management Journal, 38(2), 50–61.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva, W. M., Alvaro, A., Gustavo, H. R. P. T., Afonso, R. A., Dias, K. L., & Garcia, V. C. (2013). Smart cities software architectures: A survey. In Proceedings of the 28th annual ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC ‘13) (pp. 1722–1727). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2480362.2480688

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Damasiotis, V. (2018). Modelling software Project Management complexity-an assessment model (Stoke on Trend). Staffordshire University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneva, M., & Lazarov, B. (2018). Requirements for smart cities: Results from a systematic review of literature, In 12th International conference on research challenges in information science (RCIS), 2018 (pp. 1–6), doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2018.8406655.

  • Ekman, U. (2018). Smart city planning: Complexity. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 7(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2018070101

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fioretti, G., & Visser, B. (2004). A cognitive interpretation of organizational. E:CO Special Double Issue, 6(1–2), 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floricel, S., Piperca, S., & Tee, R. (2018). Strategies for managing the structural and dynamic consequences of project complexity. Complexity, 2018, 3190251, p. 17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Giffinger, R. et al. (2007). Smart cities—Ranking of European medium-sized cities. [Online] Retrieved July 12, 2021, from http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf

  • Grizhnevich, A. (2018). Smart city project management: Avoiding common pitfalls. [Online] Retrieved July 16, 2021, from https://www.smartcitiesworld.net/opinions/opinions/smart-city-project-management-avoiding-common-pitfalls

  • Kakarontzas, G., Anthopoulos, L., Chatzakou, D., & Vakali, A. (2014). A conceptual enterprise architecture framework for smart cities. In Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications—Volume 2 (ICETE 2014) (pp. 47–54). SCITEPRESS—Science and Technology Publications, Lda. https://doi.org/10.5220/0005021400470054

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, S., Akre, V., & Arif, M. (2019). SMART project management for SMART cities: Analyzing critical factors affecting trust among virtual project teams. Sixth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT), 2019, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITT48889.2019.9075131

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kermanshachi, S., Dao, B., Shane, J., & Anderson, S. (2016). An empirical study into identifying project complexity. Procedia Engineering, 145, 603–610.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, N., & Lee, K. J. (2014). Exploratory research on the success factors and challenges of smart city projects. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 141–189. https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2014.24.2.141

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., et al. (2014). Measurement model of project complexity for large-scale projects from task and organisation perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 610–622.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Montequín, V. R., Balsera, J. V., Fernández, S. M. C., & Fernández, F. O. (2018). Exploring project complexity through project failure factors: Analysis of cluster patterns using self-organizing maps. Complexity, 2018, 9496731, p. 17.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, A. T., Nguyen, L. D., Long, L., & Dang, C. N. (2015). Quantifying the complexity of transportation projects using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1364–1376.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T., & Mohamed, S. (2021). Mediation effect of stakeholder management between stakeholder characteristics and project performance. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 11(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.2478/jeppm-2021-0011

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Oehmen, J., Thuesen, C., Ruiz, P., & Geraldi, J. (2015). Complexity management for projects, programmes, and portfolios. An engineering systems perspective. In PMI global congress 2015—EMEA. Newtown Square, Project Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, P., Andersson, B. (2017). Challenges with smart cities initiatives—a municipal decision makers’ perspective. HICSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • PMI. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)—Fifth Edition”. sl.: Project Management Institute, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • PMI. (2017). Agile Practice Guide. sl.: s.n.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, N., Wittman, A., & Thabet, S. (2016). Managing an engineering project. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management, 7(1), 1–17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Remington, K., Zollin, R., & Turner, R. (2009). A model of project complexity: Distinguishing dimensions of complexity from severity. In The 9th international research network of project management conference (IRNOP-IX). IRNOP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlindwein, S. L., & Ison, R. (2004). Human knowing and perceived complexity: Implications for systems practice. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 6(3), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohi, A. J., Hertogh, M., Bosch-Rekveldt, M., & Blom, R. (2016). Does lean & agile project management help coping with project complexity? Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, 252–259.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, D., & Starkweather, A. (2017). IT project success: The evaluation of 142 success factors by IT PM professionals. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management, 8(3), 1–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sudhakar, G. P. (2012). A model of critical success factors for software projects. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 25(6), 537–558.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. M. (2016). Smart city: Adding to the complexity of cities. In A. Herneoja & T. O. A. P. Markkanen (Eds.), Complexity & simplicity—Proceedings of the 34th eCAADe conference—Volume 1 (pp. 651–660). University of Oulu. sl.: University of Oulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tie, B. N., & Bolluijt, J. (2014). Measuring project complexity. In 9th International conference on system of systems engineering (SOSE) (pp. 248–253). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truong, D., & Jitbaipoon, T. (2016). How can agile methodologies be used to enhance the success of information technology projects? International Journal of Information Technology Project Management, 7(2), 1–16.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoutsa, P., Fitsilis, P., Anthopoulos, L., et al. (2021). Nexus services in smart city ecosystems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00635-3

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, L. A., Marle, F., & Bocquet, J. (2011). Using a Delphi process and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 5388–5405.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S., & Chapman, C. (2003). Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 97–105.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, E., Alexander, D., Rodriguez Labastida, R., & Watson, R. (2016). UK smart cities index. UK: Commissioned by Huawei From Navigant Consulting, Inc. [online:] Retrieved from July 16, 2021, from https://www-file.huawei.com/-/media/CORPORATE/PDF/News/Huawei_Smart_Cities_Report_FINAL.pdf?la=en

  • Xia, W., & Lee, G. (2005). Complexity of information systems development projects: Conceptualization and measurement development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 45–83.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Erasmus+ KA2 under the project “DevOps competences for Smart Cities” (Project No.: 601015-EPP-1-2018-1-EL-EPPKA2-SSA).Footnote 1 This paper reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece

    Vyron Damasiotis

Authors
  1. Vyron Damasiotis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vyron Damasiotis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University Of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece

    Dr. Panos Fitsilis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Damasiotis, V. (2022). Modeling Project Management Complexity in Smart Cities’ Projects. In: Fitsilis, P. (eds) Building on Smart Cities Skills and Competences. Internet of Things. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97818-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97818-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97817-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97818-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Search

Navigation