Abstract
Informed consent is a crucial factor in determining whether particular uses of brain organoids for research and clinical translation are ethically acceptable. In the context of basic research, the consent of donors whose tissues are used to derive brain organoids is of primary concern, whereas in clinical translation the consent of both allogeneic donors and patients may be relevant. In this chapter, I examine key ethics considerations related to informed consent for brain organoid research and clinical translation. In order to do so, I first describe both a standard conceptual approach to informed consent that aims at meeting the ethical goal of respecting the autonomy of persons and some of the other ethically relevant functions of informed consent. This conceptual work provides a foundation for mapping ethics considerations related to informed consent in regard to the decision-making capacity and voluntariness of those being asked to consent, disclosure requirements associated with brain organoids in general and for particular proposed uses that involve morally significant aspects, threats to understanding that must be overcome, and considerations for authorization. Finally, I offer some suggestions for grappling with such informed consent challenges related to brain organoids.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Notes
- 1.
Beauchamp and Childress (2019).
- 2.
Dickert et al. (2017).
- 3.
- 4.
Bollinger et al. (2021).
- 5.
ISSCR (2021).
- 6.
Lowenthal et al. (2012).
- 7.
Dasgupta et al. (2014).
- 8.
Boers et al. (2016).
- 9.
Boers et al. (2018).
- 10.
- 11.
Hyun et al. (2020), p. 3.
- 12.
Munsie et al. (2017).
- 13.
Greely et al. (2007).
- 14.
Munsie et al. (2017).
- 15.
Hyun et al. (2020).
- 16.
Li et al. (2020).
- 17.
Lavori et al. (2002).
- 18.
Boers and Bredenoord (2018).
- 19.
- 20.
Nishimura et al. (2013).
- 21.
Johns Hopkins Medicine IRB (2016).
- 22.
Taylor et al. (2007).
- 23.
Lavori et al. (2007).
References
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2019) Principles of biomedical ethics, 8th edn. Oxford U Press, New York
Berkers G, van Mourik P, Vonk AM et al (2019) Rectal organoids enable personalized treatment of cystic fibrosis. Cell Rep 26(7):1701–1708
Boers SN, Bredenoord AL (2018) Consent for governance in the ethical use of organoids. Nat Cell Biol 20(6):642–645. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-018-0112-5
Boers SN, van Delden JJ, Clevers H, Bredenoord AL (2016) Organoid biobanking: identifying the ethics: organoids revive old and raise new ethical challenges for basic research and therapeutic use. EMBO Rep 17(7):938–941. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201642613
Boers SN, de Winter-de Groot KM, Noordhoek J et al (2018) Mini-guts in a dish: perspectives of adult cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and parents of young CF patients on organoid technology. J Cyst Fibros 17(3):407–415
Bollinger J, May E, Mathews D et al (2021) Patients’ perspectives on the derivation and use of organoids. Stem Cell Reports 16(8):1874–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.07.004
Chapman AR (2019) Brain models in a dish: ethical issues in developing brain organoids. AJOB Neurosci 10(3):113–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2019.1632963
Chen HI, Wolf JA, Blue R, Song MM, Moreno JD, Ming GL, Song H (2019) Transplantation of human brain organoids: revisiting the science and ethics of brain chimeras. Cell Stem Cell 25(4):462–472
Dasgupta I, Bollinger J, Mathews DJ et al (2014) Patients’ attitudes toward the donation of biological materials for the derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 14(1):9–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.006
Dekkers JF, van der Ent CK, Beekman JM (2013) Novel opportunities for CFTR-targeting drug development using organoids. Rare Dis 11(1):e27112. https://doi.org/10.4161/rdis.27112
Dickert NW, Eyal N, Goldkind SF et al (2017) Reframing consent for clinical research: a function-based approach. Am J Bioeth 17(12):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1388448
Greely HT, Cho MK, Hogle LF et al (2007) Thinking about the human neuron mouse. AJOB 7(5):27–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160701290371
Haselager DR, Boers SN, Jongsma KR et al (2021) Breeding brains? Patients’ and laymen’s perspectives on cerebral organoids. Regen Med. https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2020-0108
Hyun I, Scharf-Deering JC, Lunshof JE (2020) Ethical issues related to brain organoid research. Brain Res 1732:146653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146653. Epub 2020 Feb 1
International Society of Stem Cell Research (2021) ISSCR Guidelines for stem cell research and clinical translation. Retrieved May 8, 2022, from https://www.isscr.org/docs/default-source/all-isscr-guidelines/2021-guidelines/isscr-guidelines-for-stem-cell-research-and-clinical-translation-2021.pdf?sfvrsn=ced254b1_4
Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board. (2016). Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC research informed consent/authorization template. Retrieved February 2, 2021, from https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/institutional_review_board/forms/
Lavori P, Wilt T, Sugarman J (2007) Quality assurance questionnaire for professionals fails to improve the quality of informed consent. Clin Trials 4:638–649
Lavori PW, Krause-Steinrauf H, Brophy M et al (2002) Principles, organization, and operation of a DNA bank for clinical trials: a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Control Clin Trials 23:222–239
Li S, Wang M, Zhou J (2020) Brain organoids: a promising living biobank resource for neuroscience research. Biopreserv Biobank 18(2):136–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2019.0111
Lowenthal J, Lipnick S, Rao M, Hull SC (2012) Specimen collection for induced pluripotent stem cell research: harmonizing the approach to informed consent. Stem Cells Transl Med 1(5):409–421. https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2012-0029
Munsie M, Hyun I, Sugarman J (2017) Ethical issues in human organoid and gastruloid research. Development 144:942–945. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.140111
Nishimura A, Carey J, Erwin PJ et al (2013) Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Med Ethics 14:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-28
Taylor HA, Sugarman J, Pisetsky DS, Bathon J (2007) Formative research in clinical trial development: attitudes of patients with arthritis in enhancing prevention trials. Ann Rheum Dis 66:542–544
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sugarman, J. (2022). Ethics Considerations Regarding Donors’ and Patients’ Consent. In: Dederer, HG., Hamburger, D. (eds) Brain Organoids in Research and Therapy. Advances in Neuroethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97641-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97641-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97640-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97641-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)