Abstract
With an increasing number of researchers using the δ18OP method to investigate P cycling in the environment, it is necessary to conduct an inter-laboratory comparison study for the purification protocol as well as the measurement of silver phosphate with the TC/EA-IRMS like Watzinger et al. (2021) did. For the δ18OP method to progress, further fundamental research as well as field and laboratory studies need to be conducted. To the best of our knowledge, the effect of synthesizing enzymes on the δ18OP has not been investigated yet, despite the importance of those enzymes in the P cycle.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
6.1 Future Trends and Opportunities
With increasing fertilizer prices and the negative environmental issues such as eutrophication of aquatic systems and phosphorus contaminations in surface and groundwater that affect water quality, it is now, more than ever, vital to better understand the environmental P cycle. Studies during the last 10 years showed that the δ18OP method is a promising tool to study the environmental P cycle under field conditions and the importance of microbes for available P in soils (Tamburini et al. 2012). The oxygen isotopes in phosphates have helped in identifying P inputs in Lake Erie and Chesapeake Bay, some of the aquatic systems most struck by eutrophication (Elsbury et al. 2009; Joshi et al. 2015; Paytan et al. 2017; Depew et al. 2018). It has the potential to track P derived from glyphosate in the environment (Li et al. 2016), to name just a few highlights. The δ18OP could also provide parameters for environmental models (Jaisi et al. 2017). Modeling P cycling and including P in carbon and nitrogen models is becoming more important and the interest to also include P in life cycle assessments is increasing, especially the mineralization of organic P and its quantification are of interest for modelers (Vereecken et al. 2016; Helfenstein et al. 2018; Thum et al. 2019).
6.2 Need for Inter-laboratory Studies for Quality Control
With an increasing number of researchers using the δ18OP method to investigate P cycling in the environment, it is necessary to conduct an inter-laboratory comparison study for the purification protocol as well as the measurement of silver phosphate with the TC/EA-IRMS like Watzinger et al. (2021) did. While nowadays silver phosphate is the analyte of choice, there are different protocols for purifying extracts and precipitating silver phosphate (see, e.g., Paytan and McLaughlin 2011). Even when using the same protocol, every laboratory is most likely amending the protocol for their needs, using different equipment, consumables, and chemicals. For better comparability of different δ18OP studies, there is a need for an inter-laboratory study similar to other protocols, like for the extraction of microbial P (Bergkemper et al. 2016). Equally important is an international silver phosphate standard which should be easily available to most laboratories (Watzinger et al. 2021).
6.3 From Laboratory to Field Studies in Different Ecotones
For the δ18OP method to progress, further fundamental research, as well as field and laboratory studies, need to be conducted. To the best of our knowledge, the effect of synthesizing enzymes on the δ18OP has not been investigated yet, despite the importance of those enzymes in the P cycle. Furthermore, the effects of some processes like P uptake on the δ18OP were only shown in laboratory studies but are missing proof from field studies. The majority of δ18OP studies so far was conducted in countries in the northern hemisphere. An increase of studies in the southern hemisphere is therefore desirable. This will advance the knowledge about the variables influencing δ18OP values as countries in the global South tend to have different ecosystems, climates, and soil types compared to the North. Two aspects that need to be addressed in further field studies are the importance of soil P concentrations, i.e., P limitation and surplus, and microorganisms (community structure and activity) for the δ18OP of different soil P pools. Is there for example a relationship between P concentrations and δ18OP values and could thus the δ18OP be used as an indicator for P limitation? This will not only help with the interpretation of δ18OP data but will ultimately lead to a better understanding of P cycling in the environment.
References
Bergkemper F, Bünemann EK, Hauenstein S et al (2016) An inter-laboratory comparison of gaseous and liquid fumigation based methods for measuring microbial phosphorus (Pmic) in forest soils with differing P stocks. J Microbiol Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.006
Depew DC, Koehler G, Hiriart-Baer V (2018) Phosphorus dynamics and availability in the nearshore of Eastern Lake Erie: insights from oxygen isotope ratios of phosphate. Front Mar Sci 5:215
Elsbury KE, Paytan A, Ostrom NE et al (2009) Using oxygen isotopes of phosphate to trace phosphorus sources and cycling in Lake Erie. Environ Sci Technol 43:3108–3114. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8034126
Helfenstein J, Tamburini F, von Sperber C et al (2018) Combining spectroscopic and isotopic techniques gives a dynamic view of phosphorus cycling in soil. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05731-2
Jaisi DP, Hou Y, Stout LM, Massoudieh A (2017) Modeling of biotic and abiotic processes affecting phosphate oxygen isotope ratios in mineral-water-biota interface. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.025
Joshi SR, Kukkadapu RK, Burdige DJ et al (2015) Organic matter remineralization predominates phosphorus cycling in the mid-bay sediments in the chesapeake bay. Environ Sci Technol 49:5887–5896. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5059617
Li H, Joshi SR, Jaisi DP (2016) Degradation and isotope source tracking of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid. J Agric Food Chem 64:529–538. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04838
Paytan A, McLaughlin K (2011) Tracing the sources and biogeochemical cycling of phosphorus in aquatic systems using isotopes of oxygen in phosphate. In: Baskaran M (ed) Handbook of environmental isotope geochemistry. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
Paytan A, Roberts K, Watson S et al (2017) Internal loading of phosphate in Lake Erie Central Basin. Sci Total Environ 579:1356–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.133
Tamburini F, Pfahler V, Bünemann EK et al (2012) Oxygen isotopes unravel the role of microorganisms in phosphate cycling in soils. Environ Sci Technol 46:5956–5962. https://doi.org/10.1021/es300311h
Thum T, Caldararu S, Engel J, et al (2019) A new model of the coupled carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles in the terrestrial biosphere (QUINCY v1.0; revision 1996). Geosci Model Dev. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4781-2019
Vereecken H, Schnepf A, Hopmans JW, et al (2016) Modeling soil processes: review, key challenges, and new perspectives. Vadose Zo J 15.https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2015.09.0131
Watzinger A, Schott K, Hood R et al (2021) New Ag3PO4 comparison material for stable oxygen isotope analysis. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9101
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
The opinions expressed in this chapter are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the [NameOfOrganization], its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the [NameOfOrganization], provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
Any dispute related to the use of the works of the [NameOfOrganization] that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the [NameOfOrganization]'s name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of the [NameOfOrganization]'s logo, shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the [NameOfOrganization] and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC-IGO license. Note that the link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adu-Gyamfi, J., Pfahler, V., Heng, L., Tamburini, F. (2022). Conclusions and Way Forward. In: Adu-Gyamfi, J., Pfahler, V. (eds) Oxygen Isotopes of Inorganic Phosphate in Environmental Samples. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97497-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97497-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97496-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97497-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)