Abstract
Writing, in an art institution and beyond, can be viewed as a form of creativity, a tool of pedagogy and a way of questioning traditional concepts of knowledge and power. This study explores the complex and shifting relationships between writing, the art institution and constructs of dyslexia. The writing lives of six art students with dyslexia were investigated over the course of an academic year. One student’s writing life is presented as a detailed case study. Writing is interrogated in some of its many manifestations, notably writing as an academic, assessed and measurable outcome and writing as a form of fluid and imaginative communication.
By placing writing in the art school, both institutional power and constructs of the art school are explored. The study examines how these notions interact with and create each other. Through the work undertaken in a specialist arts university—among students both with and without the defining label of dyslexia—a possible scope for change is understood. Both in the positioning of student identity and in the way that writing is explained, explored and taught alongside a creative arts practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ASC Queer Theory. (2010). Compulsory able-bodiedness and queer/disabled existence. Retrieved from http://ascqueertheory.blogspot.com/2010/11/compulsory-able-bodiedness-and.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2021.
BDA. (2007). Dyslexia. Retrieved from https://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/dyslexic
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. SRHE and Open University Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. Routledge.
Cavanaugh, J. R. (2015). Performativity. Oxford Bibliographies. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199766567-0114
Collins English Dictionary. (2018). Duress. Retrieved from https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/duress. Accessed 26 Aug 2021.
Dallow, P. (2003). Representing creativeness: Practice-based approaches to research in creative arts. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 2(1), 49–66.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues (H. Tomlinson and B. Habberjam, Trans.) New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2002). Dialogues II: European perspectives: A series in social thought and cultural criticism (2nd ed.). Columbia University Press.
Derby, J. (2012). Art education and disability studies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v32i1.3027
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality (R. Hurley, Trans.). Penguin. (Original work published 1978).
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage. (Original work published 1977).
Francis, P. (2013). Inspiring Writing in Art and Design: Taking a Line for a Write. Bristol: Intellect.
Gao, J. (2013). Deleuze’s conception of desire. Deleuze and Guattari Studies, 7(3), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.3366/dls.2013.0120
George, D. (2002). From analysis to design: Visual communication in the teaching of writing. CCC- National Council for Teachers of English, 54(1), 11–39. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1512100
Goodley, D. (2007). Towards socially just pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian critical disability studies. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 317–334.
Goodley, D. (2013). Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability and Society, 28(5), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.717884
Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability studies: theorising disablism and ableism. Abingdon: Routledge.
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove: Taylor and Francis.
Groppel-Wegener, A. (2012). Tactile academia: Exploring the links between creative and academic practice. https://tactileacademia.com/workshops/. Accessed 20 Aug 2021.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
Hickey-Moody, A., Palmer, H., & Sayers, E. (2016). Diffractive pedagogies: Dancing across new materialist imaginaries. Gender and Education, 28(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1140723
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
Mattelart, A., & Mattelart, M. (1992). Rethinking media theory: Signposts and new directions. University of Minnesota Press.
McEvilley, T. (1986). Introduction. In B. O’Doherty (Ed.), Inside the white cube: The ideology of the gallery space (pp. 7–12). University of California Press.
McRuer, R. (2004). Compulsory able-bodiedness and queer/disabled existence. In S. Snyder, B. Brueggemann, & R. Garland-Thomson (Eds.), Disability studies: Enabling the humanities. MLA Press.
Orr, S., & Blythman, M. (2005). Transparent opacity: assessment in the inclusive academy. In C. Rust, (Ed.), Improving student learning: Diversity and inclusivity (pp.175–187). Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Pierre, E. S. (2014). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: toward “post inquiry”. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2–19. Retrieved from https://www.journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/viewFile/521/stpierre.pdf
Richardson, L. (1990). Writing strategies reaching diverse audiences. London: Sage.
Schon, D. A. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
Sheikh, S. (2009). Positively white cube revisited. E-Flux, 3. Retrieved from https://www.e-flux.com/journal/03/68545/positively-white-cube-revisited/. Accessed 20 August 2021.
Smith, D., & Protevi, J. (2020). “Gilles Deleuze”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/deleuze/
Snowling, M., & Griffiths, Y. (2004). Individual differences in dyslexia. In T. Nunes and P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Stoler, A. L. (2016). Duress: Imperial durabilities in our times. Duke University Press.
Tobias-Green, K. (2014). The role of the agreement: art students, dyslexia, reading and writing in Art. Design & Communication in Higher Education, 13(2), 189–199.
Van Rensburg, W. (2006). Making academia transparent: Negotiating academic identities in the writing center. Retrieved from https://zeitschrift-schreiben.eu/globalassets/zeitschrift-schreiben.eu/2006/rensburg_academicidenities.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2021.
Wolff, U., & Lundberg, I. (2002). The prevalence of dyslexia among art students. Dyslexia, 8(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.211
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tobias-Green, K. (2022). Deconstructing Writing in Arts Education and Beyond. In: Broadhead, S. (eds) Access and Widening Participation in Arts Higher Education. The Arts in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97450-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97450-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97449-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97450-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)