Abstract
Training and innovation in project management has a high impact in different scenarios of society. In this context, one way to achieve sustainable development is the creation of ecosystems for training and innovation. This article presents an ecosystem proposal that combines the teaching of project management techniques with artificial intelligence techniques. It is an ecosystem created to contribute to the introduction of emerging technologies in the management of investment projects. To achieve sustainability, the ecosystem itself develops computer solutions such as BusinessRedmine that facilitate practical teaching. These same IT solutions are marketed in different environments, generating funds that are reinvested in the development of the ecosystem. For the validation of the research, a set of indicators based on different international experiences are used. In addition, multi-criteria analysis methods are applied for the evaluation of the training ecosystem by the beneficiaries. The applicability of the ecosystem is demonstrated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dave, B., Buda, A., Nurminen, A., Främling, K.: A framework for integrating BIM and IoT through open standards. Autom. Constr. 95, 35–45 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.022
Herczeg, M., et al.: Resource efficiency in the building sector. ECORYS Ned. BV Cph. Resour. Inst. (2014)
Dunbar, G.: Project management failures—Standish (Chaos) reports (1994–2015) (2016). Available: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/project-management-failures-standish-chaos-report-2015-dunbar. Accessed: 21-July-2021
Lynch, J.: Project Resolution Benchmark for IBEX Financial Corp, p. 11. Standish Group Int. Inc (2018)
Johnson, J.: CHAOS report: decision latency theory: it is all about the interval. Lulu.com (2018)
Gamarra, G.D.: Plan Agrupado de Formación Continua Comunidades de Práctica, buenas prácticas para la dinamización de entornos virtuales disponibles (2010) [Online]. Available: http://puntodeencuentro.utn.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/dinamizacion.pdf. Accessed: 21-May-2021
Pérez, I., García-Vacacela, R., Piñero, P.Y., Mahdi, G.S., Peña, M.: Experiencias en el uso de técnicas de softcomputing en la evaluación de proyectos de software. Rev. Investig. Oper. 41(1), 106–117 (2020)
Piñero, P.Y.: Estatutos Red Colaborativa de Gestión de Proyectos. Departamento de Investigaciones en Gestión de Proyectos, Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas Maestría en Gestión de Proyectos (2021) [Online]. Available: http://gespro.uci.cu. Accessed: 21-May-2021
PMI: The Standard for Project Management and a Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 7th ed., p. 370. Project Management Institute (2021). ISBN: 978-1-62825-664-2
Stellingwerf, R., Zandhuis, A.: ISO 21500 Guidance on Project Management: A Pocket Guide (Best Practice). Van Haren (2013)
ISO: ISO 19650 Building Information Modelling (2019)
Mahdi, G.S.: Estimation of distribution algorithm for solving the multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problem. EAI Endorsed Trans. Energy Web 7(27) (2020). http://doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-7-2018.164111
Mahdi, G.S., Piñero, R.Y., García-Vacacela, R., Quintana, J.M., Al-subhi, H., Pérez, I.: Nuevo algoritmo de estimación de distribuciones con diferentes métodos de aprendizaje aplicado a planificación de proyectos. Rev. Investig. Oper. 41(7), 945–960 (2020)
Mahdi, G.S., Al-subhi, H., García-Vacacela, R. Pérez, I., Madera, J., Piñero, P.Y.: Algoritmo de estimación de distribución con tratamiento de restricciones en el modelo probabilístico en problemas de scheduling. Rev. Investig. Oper. 40(5), 674–686 (2019). ISSN 0257-4306
Piñero, P.Y., Pérez, I., Rivero, C., Rojas, C., Sosa, R., Torres, S.: Repositorio de datos para investigaciones en gestión de proyectos. Rev. Cuba. Cienc. Informáticas 13(1), 176–191 (2019)
Sarif, S., Ramly, S., Yusof, R., Fadzillah, N.A., Sulaiman, N.Y.: Investigation of success and failure factors in IT project management. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research, Singapore, pp. 671–682 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_70
Aguiar, D., Fenner, G., Sampaio, A.: A risk management methodology proposal for information technology projects. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 12(4), 643–656 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2014.6868866
Kurek, E., Johnson, J., Mulder, H.: Measuring the Value of Enterprise Architecture on IT Projects with CHAOS Research. MSCI, Orlando, USA (2017)
CALED: Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Calidad en Educación Superior y a Distancia (2021) [Online]. Available: http://www.caled-ead.org/. Accessed: 24-Nov-2021
Universidad de Valencia: Modelo ADDIE modelo básico de Diseño Instruccional (2013)
UAPA: Universidad Abierta para Adultos. Departamento de Orientación Profesional y Académica (2021) [Online]. Available: www.uapa.edu.do. Accessed: 24-Nov-2021
DEAC: Accreditation Handbook. Policies, Procedures, Standards and Guides of the Distance Education Accrediting Commission, 30th ed. (2021)
Salmon, G.: E-actividades: el factor clave para una formación en línea activa. Editorial UOC (2004)
Alsalamah, A., Callinan, C.: The Kirkpatrick model for training evaluation: bibliometric analysis after 60 years (1959–2020). Ind. Commer. Train. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-12-2020-0115
JAN: Sistema de Evaluación y Acreditación de Maestrías. Junta de Acreditación Nacional, Ministerio de Educación Superior (2014)
Marciniak, R., Gairín, J.: Dimensiones de evaluación de la calidadde de educación virtual: revisión de modelos referentes. Rev. Iberoam. Educ. Distancia RIED 21(1), 216–231 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.16182
Mark, W., Steven, V.: Directrices de la UNESCO para las políticas de aprendizaje móvil. UNESCO (2013)
Villar, L.B., Herrero, L.L., López, G.Á., Gil, E.P.: Caracterización de las mejores prácticas educativas: UNESCO y el paradigma del aprendizaje móvil. Digit. Educ. Rev. 39, 336–355 (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verdecia Vicet, P., Piñero Pérez, P.Y., Pérez Pupo, I., García Vacacela, R., Villavicencio Bermúdez, N. (2022). Combining Artificial Intelligence and Project Management Techniques in Ecosystem for Training and Innovation. In: Piñero Pérez, P.Y., Bello Pérez, R.E., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Project Management and Making Decisions. UCIENCIA 2021. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1035. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97269-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97269-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97268-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97269-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)