Skip to main content

Combining Artificial Intelligence and Project Management Techniques in Ecosystem for Training and Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Project Management and Making Decisions (UCIENCIA 2021)

Abstract

Training and innovation in project management has a high impact in different scenarios of society. In this context, one way to achieve sustainable development is the creation of ecosystems for training and innovation. This article presents an ecosystem proposal that combines the teaching of project management techniques with artificial intelligence techniques. It is an ecosystem created to contribute to the introduction of emerging technologies in the management of investment projects. To achieve sustainability, the ecosystem itself develops computer solutions such as BusinessRedmine that facilitate practical teaching. These same IT solutions are marketed in different environments, generating funds that are reinvested in the development of the ecosystem. For the validation of the research, a set of indicators based on different international experiences are used. In addition, multi-criteria analysis methods are applied for the evaluation of the training ecosystem by the beneficiaries. The applicability of the ecosystem is demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dave, B., Buda, A., Nurminen, A., Främling, K.: A framework for integrating BIM and IoT through open standards. Autom. Constr. 95, 35–45 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Herczeg, M., et al.: Resource efficiency in the building sector. ECORYS Ned. BV Cph. Resour. Inst. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dunbar, G.: Project management failures—Standish (Chaos) reports (1994–2015) (2016). Available: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/project-management-failures-standish-chaos-report-2015-dunbar. Accessed: 21-July-2021

  4. Lynch, J.: Project Resolution Benchmark for IBEX Financial Corp, p. 11. Standish Group Int. Inc (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson, J.: CHAOS report: decision latency theory: it is all about the interval. Lulu.com (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gamarra, G.D.: Plan Agrupado de Formación Continua Comunidades de Práctica, buenas prácticas para la dinamización de entornos virtuales disponibles (2010) [Online]. Available: http://puntodeencuentro.utn.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/dinamizacion.pdf. Accessed: 21-May-2021

  7. Pérez, I., García-Vacacela, R., Piñero, P.Y., Mahdi, G.S., Peña, M.: Experiencias en el uso de técnicas de softcomputing en la evaluación de proyectos de software. Rev. Investig. Oper. 41(1), 106–117 (2020)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Piñero, P.Y.: Estatutos Red Colaborativa de Gestión de Proyectos. Departamento de Investigaciones en Gestión de Proyectos, Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas Maestría en Gestión de Proyectos (2021) [Online]. Available: http://gespro.uci.cu. Accessed: 21-May-2021

  9. PMI: The Standard for Project Management and a Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 7th ed., p. 370. Project Management Institute (2021). ISBN: 978-1-62825-664-2

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stellingwerf, R., Zandhuis, A.: ISO 21500 Guidance on Project Management: A Pocket Guide (Best Practice). Van Haren (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISO: ISO 19650 Building Information Modelling (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mahdi, G.S.: Estimation of distribution algorithm for solving the multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problem. EAI Endorsed Trans. Energy Web 7(27) (2020). http://doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-7-2018.164111

  13. Mahdi, G.S., Piñero, R.Y., García-Vacacela, R., Quintana, J.M., Al-subhi, H., Pérez, I.: Nuevo algoritmo de estimación de distribuciones con diferentes métodos de aprendizaje aplicado a planificación de proyectos. Rev. Investig. Oper. 41(7), 945–960 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mahdi, G.S., Al-subhi, H., García-Vacacela, R. Pérez, I., Madera, J., Piñero, P.Y.: Algoritmo de estimación de distribución con tratamiento de restricciones en el modelo probabilístico en problemas de scheduling. Rev. Investig. Oper. 40(5), 674–686 (2019). ISSN 0257-4306

    Google Scholar 

  15. Piñero, P.Y., Pérez, I., Rivero, C., Rojas, C., Sosa, R., Torres, S.: Repositorio de datos para investigaciones en gestión de proyectos. Rev. Cuba. Cienc. Informáticas 13(1), 176–191 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sarif, S., Ramly, S., Yusof, R., Fadzillah, N.A., Sulaiman, N.Y.: Investigation of success and failure factors in IT project management. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research, Singapore, pp. 671–682 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_70

  17. Aguiar, D., Fenner, G., Sampaio, A.: A risk management methodology proposal for information technology projects. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 12(4), 643–656 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2014.6868866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurek, E., Johnson, J., Mulder, H.: Measuring the Value of Enterprise Architecture on IT Projects with CHAOS Research. MSCI, Orlando, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. CALED: Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Calidad en Educación Superior y a Distancia (2021) [Online]. Available: http://www.caled-ead.org/. Accessed: 24-Nov-2021

  20. Universidad de Valencia: Modelo ADDIE modelo básico de Diseño Instruccional (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. UAPA: Universidad Abierta para Adultos. Departamento de Orientación Profesional y Académica (2021) [Online]. Available: www.uapa.edu.do. Accessed: 24-Nov-2021

  22. DEAC: Accreditation Handbook. Policies, Procedures, Standards and Guides of the Distance Education Accrediting Commission, 30th ed. (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Salmon, G.: E-actividades: el factor clave para una formación en línea activa. Editorial UOC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alsalamah, A., Callinan, C.: The Kirkpatrick model for training evaluation: bibliometric analysis after 60 years (1959–2020). Ind. Commer. Train. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-12-2020-0115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. JAN: Sistema de Evaluación y Acreditación de Maestrías. Junta de Acreditación Nacional, Ministerio de Educación Superior (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marciniak, R., Gairín, J.: Dimensiones de evaluación de la calidadde de educación virtual: revisión de modelos referentes. Rev. Iberoam. Educ. Distancia RIED 21(1), 216–231 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.16182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mark, W., Steven, V.: Directrices de la UNESCO para las políticas de aprendizaje móvil. UNESCO (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Villar, L.B., Herrero, L.L., López, G.Á., Gil, E.P.: Caracterización de las mejores prácticas educativas: UNESCO y el paradigma del aprendizaje móvil. Digit. Educ. Rev. 39, 336–355 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascual Verdecia Vicet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Verdecia Vicet, P., Piñero Pérez, P.Y., Pérez Pupo, I., García Vacacela, R., Villavicencio Bermúdez, N. (2022). Combining Artificial Intelligence and Project Management Techniques in Ecosystem for Training and Innovation. In: Piñero Pérez, P.Y., Bello Pérez, R.E., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Project Management and Making Decisions. UCIENCIA 2021. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1035. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97269-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics