Skip to main content

Large and Giant Aneurysms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Eight Aneurysms
  • 264 Accesses

Abstract

The large (>1 cm) and giant (>2.5 cm) aneurysms constitute a unique group of intracranial aneurysms due to the difficulty of the treatment with both surgical and endovascular approaches. The high risk of rupture and other mass effect symptoms and complications associated with the endovascular treatment make it a significant challenge for endovascular physicians. With the flow diverter becoming a major treatment of the large and giant aneurysm, many other strategies are still valid in many situations and are discussed. The common complications associated with large and giant aneurysm treatment, such as device migrations/retraction, flow-diverter stent occlusion, and in-stent stenosis, delayed aneurysm rupture, new or worsening of presenting symptoms of mass effect, etc., are reviewed. Many specific techniques for large and giant aneurysm embolization are introduced in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362(9378):103–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wiebers DO. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history and clinical management. Update on the international study of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2006;16(3):383–90, vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lv X, Ge H, He H, Jiang C, Li Y. A systematic review of pipeline embolization device for giant intracranial aneurysms. Neurol India. 2017;65(1):35–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Campos JK, Ball BZ, Cheaney Ii B, et al. Multimodal management of giant cerebral aneurysms: review of literature and case presentation. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020;5(1):22–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cagnazzo F, Mantilla D, Rouchaud A, et al. Endovascular treatment of very large and Giant intracranial aneurysms: comparison between reconstructive and deconstructive techniques-a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(5):852–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sorteberg A, Bakke SJ, Boysen M, Sorteberg W. Angiographic balloon test occlusion and therapeutic sacrifice of major arteries to the brain. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(4):651–60; dicussion 660–651.

    Google Scholar 

  7. van der Schaaf IC, Brilstra EH, Buskens E, Rinkel GJ. Endovascular treatment of aneurysms in the cavernous sinus: a systematic review on balloon occlusion of the parent vessel and embolization with coils. Stroke. 2002;33(1):313–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarencon F, Bonneville F, Boch AL, Lejean L, Biondi A. Parent artery occlusion is not obsolete in giant aneurysms of the ICA. Experience with very-long-term follow-up. Neuroradiology. 2011;53(12):973–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Rooij WJ. Endovascular treatment of cavernous sinus aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(2):323–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yan P, Zhang Y, Liang F, et al. Comparison of safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatments for Unruptured intracranial large or Giant aneurysms in internal carotid artery. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:e385–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vincent F, Weill A, Roy D, Raymond J, Guilbert F. Carotid ophthalmic aneurysm rupture after parent vessel occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(6):1372–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubovoy AV, Ovsyannikov KS, Guzhin VE, et al. The use of high-flow extracranial-intracranial artery bypass in pathology of the cerebral and brachiocephalic arteries: technical features and surgical outcomes. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2017;81(2):5–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gruber A, Killer M, Bavinzski G, Richling B. Clinical and angiographic results of endosaccular coiling treatment of giant and very large intracranial aneurysms: a 7-year, single-center experience. Neurosurgery. 1999;45(4):793–803; discussion 803–794.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sluzewski M, Menovsky T, van Rooij WJ, Wijnalda D. Coiling of very large or giant cerebral aneurysms: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(2):257–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ogilvy CS, Chua MH, Fusco MR, Reddy AS, Thomas AJ. Stratification of recanalization for patients with endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(4):390–5; discussion 395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bernat AL, Clarencon F, Andre A, et al. Risk factors for angiographic recurrence after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes from a series of 178 unruptured aneurysms treated by regular coiling or surgery. J Neuroradiol. 2017;44(5):298–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lecler A, Raymond J, Rodriguez-Regent C, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: recurrences more than 10 years after endovascular treatment-a prospective cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2015;277(1):173–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Colby GP, Lin LM, Nundkumar N, et al. Radiation dose analysis of large and giant internal carotid artery aneurysm treatment with the pipeline embolization device versus traditional coiling techniques. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(5):380–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013;267(3):858–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oishi H, Teranishi K, Yatomi K, Fujii T, Yamamoto M, Arai H. Flow diverter therapy using a pipeline embolization device for 100 Unruptured large and Giant internal carotid artery aneurysms in a single Center in a Japanese Population. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2018;58(11):461–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Adeeb N, Griessenauer CJ, Shallwani H, et al. Pipeline embolization device in treatment of 50 Unruptured large and Giant aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:232–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Park MS, Nanaszko M, Sanborn MR, Moon K, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG. Re-treatment rates after treatment with the pipeline embolization device alone versus pipeline and coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg. 2016;125(1):137–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Becske T, Brinjikji W, Potts MB, et al. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the pipeline for Uncoilable or failed aneurysms trial. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(1):40–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Trivelato FP, Ulhoa AC, Rezende MT, Castro-Afonso LH, Abud DG. Recurrence of a totally occluded aneurysm after treatment with a pipeline embolization device. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen CJ, Patibandla MR, Park MS, Kalani MY. Regrowth of a large intracranial aneurysm after on-label use of the pipeline embolization device. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019;10(1):142–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang X, Lv N, Wang C, Cao W, Liu J, Huang Q. Late recurrence of a completely occluded large intracranial aneurysm treated with a Tubridge flow diverter. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(2):e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dehdashti AR, Thines L, Willinsky RA, Tymianski M. Symptomatic enlargement of an occluded giant carotido-ophthalmic aneurysm after endovascular treatment: the vasa vasorum theory. Acta Neurochir. 2009;151(9):1153–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(4):775–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris SI, Gonzalez LF, et al. Spontaneous delayed migration/shortening of the pipeline embolization device: report of 5 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(12):2326–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pistocchi S, Blanc R, Bartolini B, Piotin M. Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2012;43(4):1032–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chow M, McDougall C, O'Kelly C, Ashforth R, Johnson E, Fiorella D. Delayed spontaneous rupture of a posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm following treatment with flow diversion: a clinicopathologic study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(4):E46–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kulcsar Z, Houdart E, Bonafe A, et al. Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(1):20–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hampton T, Walsh D, Tolias C, Fiorella D. Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011;3(2):167–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fox B, Humphries WE, Doss VT, Hoit D, Elijovich L, Arthur AS. Rupture of giant vertebrobasilar aneurysm following flow diversion: mechanical stretch as a potential mechanism for early aneurysm rupture. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Turowski B, Macht S, Kulcsar Z, Hanggi D, Stummer W. Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology. 2011;53(1):37–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rouchaud A, Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kadirvel R, Kallmes DF. Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(2):171–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, et al. International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(1):108–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Berge J, Biondi A, Machi P, et al. Flow-diverter silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(6):1150–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sirakov S, Sirakov A, Bhogal P, et al. The p64 flow diverter-mid-term and long-term results from a single center. Clin Neuroradiol. 2020;30(3):471–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Berge J, Tourdias T, Moreau JF, Barreau X, Dousset V. Perianeurysmal brain inflammation after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(10):1930–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hassan T, Hamimi A. Successful endovascular management of brain aneurysms presenting with mass effect and cranial nerve palsy. Neurosurg Rev. 2013;36(1):87–97. discussion 97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang Z, Tian Z, Li W, et al. Variation of mass effect after using a flow diverter with adjunctive coil embolization for symptomatic Unruptured large and Giant intracranial aneurysms. Front Neurol. 2019;10:1191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. de Korte AM, Aquarius R, Meijer FJA, Boogaarts HD, de Vries J. Intracranial aneurysm expansion might cause neurological deterioration after flow diverter treatment. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e802–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hampton T, Walsh D, Tolias C, Fiorella D. Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(Suppl 1):i51–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Szikora I, Marosfoi M, Salomvary B, Berentei Z, Gubucz I. Resolution of mass effect and compression symptoms following endoluminal flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(5):935–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Slater LA, Soufan C, Holt M, Chong W. Effect of flow diversion with silk on aneurysm size: a single center experience. Interv Neuroradiol. 2015;21(1):12–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Jevsek M, Mounayer C, Seruga T. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms of cavernous and ophthalmic segment of internal carotid artery with flow diverter device pipeline. Radiol Oncol. 2016;50(4):378–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Piano M, Valvassori L, Quilici L, Pero G, Boccardi E. Midterm and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(2):408–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kan P, Wakhloo AK, Mokin M, Puri A. Techniques in distal access of wide-necked giant intracranial aneurysms during treatment with flow diversion. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6(Suppl 7):S284–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Edwards L, Kota G, Morris PP. The sea anchor technique: a novel method to aid in stent-assisted embolization of giant cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5(6):e39.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Fargen KM, Velat GJ, Lawson MF, Hoh BL, Mocco J. The stent anchor technique for distal access through a large or giant aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5(4):e24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Snyder KV, Natarajan SK, Hauck EF, et al. The balloon anchor technique: a novel technique for distal access through a giant aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg. 2010;2(4):363–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Vollherbst DF, Hohenstatt S, Schonenberger S, Bendszus M, Mohlenbruch MA. WEB as a combined support and embolization device in a giant partially thrombosed donut-shaped aneurysm. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;75:210–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Cagnazzo F, Dargazanli C, Lefevre PH, et al. WEB-assisted microwire navigation for the treatment of complex wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: technical note. J Neuroradiol. 2020;47(4):323–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kono K, Okada H, Terada T. A novel neck-sealing balloon technique for distal access through a giant aneurysm. Neurosurgery 2013;73(2 Suppl Operative):onsE302–5; discussion onsE305-306.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cohen JE, Gomori JM, Moscovici S, Itshayek E. Balloon-guided navigation technique to perform stenting in an acutely angled anterior cerebral artery. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(3):452–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Fischer VE, Tavakoli S, Rodriguez P, Birnbaum LA, Mascitelli JR. The ricochet-scepter technique: a balloon-assisted technique to achieve outflow access during pipeline-assisted coil embolization of a near-Giant internal carotid artery ophthalmic aneurysm. World Neurosurg. 2020;145:51–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hauck EF, Natarajan SK, Langer DJ, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI. Retrograde trans-posterior communicating artery snare-assisted rescue of lost access to a foreshortened pipeline embolization device: complication management. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(2 Suppl Operative):495–502.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Miyachi S, Matsubara N, Izumi T, et al. The 'one and a half round microcatheterization technique' for stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysm: technical case series. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(5):357–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Case Presentation

Case Presentation

Case 11.1 Intravascular Flow Diversion Treatment for Large/Giant Aneurysms

Case Pearls

  1. 1.

    Initial FDA-approved indication for PED includes large or giant wide-necked ICA aneurysm from the petrous to the superior hypophyseal segments.

  2. 2.

    The new indication expands to small or medium, wide-necked brain aneurysms from the petrous to the terminus of ICA in 2019.

figure a

(a): 3D angiogram of left ICA for a patient with known bilateral ICA aneurysms showing a large left paraclinoid ICA aneurysm; (b): pre-embo 2D embo view; (c): immediate post-PED treatment; (d): single shot for PED contour; (e): 3D angiogram of right ICA showing another wide-neck smaller ophthalmic artery aneurysm; (f–h): embolization with PED 1 month later. (i, j): 6-month follow-up, small entrance remnants of left-side large aneurysm, complete obliteration of right ICA aneurysm

Case 11.2 FD Device Plus Additional Coiling for Large Supraglenoid ICA Aneurysm

Case Pearls

  1. 1.

    Addition of coiling to FD embolization of large wide-neck aneurysm is preferred by many providers.

  2. 2.

    Added coiling is believed to facilitate the thrombosis of the aneurysm.

  3. 3.

    Coils occupy the aneurysm space and decrease the fresh clot size and risk of delayed aneurysm rupture.

figure b

(a, b): Pre-embo 3D, large right paraclinoid ICA aneurysm; the parent vessel convexed at the neck of the aneurysm with near 90° angle turn; (c, d): pre-embo 2D embo views for better view of the distal landing zone and neck of the aneurysm; (e, f): before deploying the FD stent completely, jail the coiling catheter and partially deploy the coil to prevent the FD stent from collapsing when deployed; especially when advancing the stent, pushing wire is needed; (g, h): final run shows the coil mass and stent position; (il): 4-month follow-up, complete obliteration of the aneurysm

Case 11.3 Mechanical Support for FD Device From Additional Coil Mass

Case Pearls

Mechanical support from additional coil mass can be pivotal in two situations:

  • Large aneurysm with parent artery convex toward the dome carries the risk of collapse of the FD stent into the anuerysm sac.

  • For large aneurysms located more distal in the paraclinoid ICA, the distal landing zone for the FD stent may not be long enough to safely hold the FD device. In a ruptured situation, the support from the additional coil mass is more important as vasospasm can squeeze the stent into the aneurysm sac.

figure c

(a): 3D angiogram showing a large wide-neck paraclinoid ICA aneurysm with ICA convexed toward the aneurysm sac; (b): pre-embo 2D view for the best view of the neck to watch the FD stent interaction with the coils; (c): angiogram after embolization is finished; (d): 7-month follow-up showing complete obliteration of the aneurysm; (e): single-shot X-ray showing the relationship of PED with coils and support of the coil mass to the PED (double arrow)

Case 11.4 Destructive Treatment of the Distal Large Aneurysm

Case Pearls

  1. 1.

    For distal large aneurysm/or small aneurysm, parent vessel sacrifice can be the treatment option if located beyond the major perforator segment.

  2. 2.

    Baby or kids can tolerate the destructive treatment better than adult.

  3. 3.

    Simple treatment is better for the infant from the radiation injury standpoint.

figure d

(a): Head CT for work-up of somnolence on a new infant baby showing posterior fossa hemorrhagic lesion; (b, c): AP and lateral angiogram performed with 4 Fr dilator as a femoral sheath and XT-27 microcatheter (Stryker) as diagnostic catheter showing a 13x8mm distal PICA aneurysm; (d, e): selective angiogram with microcatheter tip positioned at the takeoff of the left PICA showing clear contour of the aneurysm; due to short PICA segment and big sac of the aneurysm, the onyx was not considered for embolization; occlusion of proximal PICA with coil was planned; (f, g): due to a sharp turn at the takeoff of left PICA, catheterization of left PICA more distally was unsuccessful. Unable to pass the microwire further distally; one Target Nano 1x3 coil for occlusion of the proximal PICA; (h): POD#3 MRA; (i): 7-month MRA follow-up

Case 11.5 Management of Large Active Bleeding Aneurysm

Case Pearls

  1. 1.

    Early re-rupture (within 24 hours from initial rupture) is more common in the large/giant aneurysms.

  2. 2.

    The outcome of early re-rupture is usually dismal.

  3. 3.

    Intraoperative bleeding during diagnostic angiogram is rare. Quick coiling if possible is a practical and effective option.

  4. 4.

    Balloon or coil occlusion of the parent artery is the last option.

figure e

(a): Middle-aged female presented with syncope and seizure with CT SAH; (b): CTA: large right paraclinoid ICA aneurysm; (c): head CT after EVD placement showing new hemorrhage; (d, e): first diagnostic angiogram showing active bleeding; (f): sequential and quick coiling processes (Target XL standard 12x45, 10x40, 9x30, XL Soft, 5x15, Soft: 5x15x2, 6x20); (g): post-embo CT: slightly increased SAH/IVH. The patient subsequently underwent hemicraniectomy for decompression; (h, i): 1-week angiogram showing vasospasm (h) and improvement after treatment (i); j: 3-week angiogram showing coil compaction. Patient eventually passed away

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ren, Z. (2022). Large and Giant Aneurysms. In: Eight Aneurysms. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97216-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97216-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97215-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97216-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics