Abstract
The large (>1 cm) and giant (>2.5 cm) aneurysms constitute a unique group of intracranial aneurysms due to the difficulty of the treatment with both surgical and endovascular approaches. The high risk of rupture and other mass effect symptoms and complications associated with the endovascular treatment make it a significant challenge for endovascular physicians. With the flow diverter becoming a major treatment of the large and giant aneurysm, many other strategies are still valid in many situations and are discussed. The common complications associated with large and giant aneurysm treatment, such as device migrations/retraction, flow-diverter stent occlusion, and in-stent stenosis, delayed aneurysm rupture, new or worsening of presenting symptoms of mass effect, etc., are reviewed. Many specific techniques for large and giant aneurysm embolization are introduced in detail.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362(9378):103–10.
Wiebers DO. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history and clinical management. Update on the international study of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2006;16(3):383–90, vii.
Lv X, Ge H, He H, Jiang C, Li Y. A systematic review of pipeline embolization device for giant intracranial aneurysms. Neurol India. 2017;65(1):35–8.
Campos JK, Ball BZ, Cheaney Ii B, et al. Multimodal management of giant cerebral aneurysms: review of literature and case presentation. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020;5(1):22–8.
Cagnazzo F, Mantilla D, Rouchaud A, et al. Endovascular treatment of very large and Giant intracranial aneurysms: comparison between reconstructive and deconstructive techniques-a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(5):852–8.
Sorteberg A, Bakke SJ, Boysen M, Sorteberg W. Angiographic balloon test occlusion and therapeutic sacrifice of major arteries to the brain. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(4):651–60; dicussion 660–651.
van der Schaaf IC, Brilstra EH, Buskens E, Rinkel GJ. Endovascular treatment of aneurysms in the cavernous sinus: a systematic review on balloon occlusion of the parent vessel and embolization with coils. Stroke. 2002;33(1):313–8.
Clarencon F, Bonneville F, Boch AL, Lejean L, Biondi A. Parent artery occlusion is not obsolete in giant aneurysms of the ICA. Experience with very-long-term follow-up. Neuroradiology. 2011;53(12):973–82.
van Rooij WJ. Endovascular treatment of cavernous sinus aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(2):323–6.
Yan P, Zhang Y, Liang F, et al. Comparison of safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatments for Unruptured intracranial large or Giant aneurysms in internal carotid artery. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:e385–91.
Vincent F, Weill A, Roy D, Raymond J, Guilbert F. Carotid ophthalmic aneurysm rupture after parent vessel occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(6):1372–4.
Dubovoy AV, Ovsyannikov KS, Guzhin VE, et al. The use of high-flow extracranial-intracranial artery bypass in pathology of the cerebral and brachiocephalic arteries: technical features and surgical outcomes. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2017;81(2):5–21.
Gruber A, Killer M, Bavinzski G, Richling B. Clinical and angiographic results of endosaccular coiling treatment of giant and very large intracranial aneurysms: a 7-year, single-center experience. Neurosurgery. 1999;45(4):793–803; discussion 803–794.
Sluzewski M, Menovsky T, van Rooij WJ, Wijnalda D. Coiling of very large or giant cerebral aneurysms: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(2):257–62.
Ogilvy CS, Chua MH, Fusco MR, Reddy AS, Thomas AJ. Stratification of recanalization for patients with endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(4):390–5; discussion 395.
Bernat AL, Clarencon F, Andre A, et al. Risk factors for angiographic recurrence after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes from a series of 178 unruptured aneurysms treated by regular coiling or surgery. J Neuroradiol. 2017;44(5):298–307.
Lecler A, Raymond J, Rodriguez-Regent C, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: recurrences more than 10 years after endovascular treatment-a prospective cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2015;277(1):173–80.
Colby GP, Lin LM, Nundkumar N, et al. Radiation dose analysis of large and giant internal carotid artery aneurysm treatment with the pipeline embolization device versus traditional coiling techniques. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(5):380–4.
Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013;267(3):858–68.
Oishi H, Teranishi K, Yatomi K, Fujii T, Yamamoto M, Arai H. Flow diverter therapy using a pipeline embolization device for 100 Unruptured large and Giant internal carotid artery aneurysms in a single Center in a Japanese Population. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2018;58(11):461–7.
Adeeb N, Griessenauer CJ, Shallwani H, et al. Pipeline embolization device in treatment of 50 Unruptured large and Giant aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:232–7.
Park MS, Nanaszko M, Sanborn MR, Moon K, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG. Re-treatment rates after treatment with the pipeline embolization device alone versus pipeline and coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg. 2016;125(1):137–44.
Becske T, Brinjikji W, Potts MB, et al. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the pipeline for Uncoilable or failed aneurysms trial. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(1):40–8.
Trivelato FP, Ulhoa AC, Rezende MT, Castro-Afonso LH, Abud DG. Recurrence of a totally occluded aneurysm after treatment with a pipeline embolization device. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018.
Chen CJ, Patibandla MR, Park MS, Kalani MY. Regrowth of a large intracranial aneurysm after on-label use of the pipeline embolization device. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019;10(1):142–4.
Zhang X, Lv N, Wang C, Cao W, Liu J, Huang Q. Late recurrence of a completely occluded large intracranial aneurysm treated with a Tubridge flow diverter. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(2):e6.
Dehdashti AR, Thines L, Willinsky RA, Tymianski M. Symptomatic enlargement of an occluded giant carotido-ophthalmic aneurysm after endovascular treatment: the vasa vasorum theory. Acta Neurochir. 2009;151(9):1153–8.
Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(4):775–80.
Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris SI, Gonzalez LF, et al. Spontaneous delayed migration/shortening of the pipeline embolization device: report of 5 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(12):2326–30.
Pistocchi S, Blanc R, Bartolini B, Piotin M. Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2012;43(4):1032–8.
Chow M, McDougall C, O'Kelly C, Ashforth R, Johnson E, Fiorella D. Delayed spontaneous rupture of a posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm following treatment with flow diversion: a clinicopathologic study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(4):E46–51.
Kulcsar Z, Houdart E, Bonafe A, et al. Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(1):20–5.
Hampton T, Walsh D, Tolias C, Fiorella D. Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011;3(2):167–71.
Fox B, Humphries WE, Doss VT, Hoit D, Elijovich L, Arthur AS. Rupture of giant vertebrobasilar aneurysm following flow diversion: mechanical stretch as a potential mechanism for early aneurysm rupture. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014.
Turowski B, Macht S, Kulcsar Z, Hanggi D, Stummer W. Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology. 2011;53(1):37–41.
Rouchaud A, Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kadirvel R, Kallmes DF. Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(2):171–7.
Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, et al. International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(1):108–15.
Berge J, Biondi A, Machi P, et al. Flow-diverter silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(6):1150–5.
Sirakov S, Sirakov A, Bhogal P, et al. The p64 flow diverter-mid-term and long-term results from a single center. Clin Neuroradiol. 2020;30(3):471–80.
Berge J, Tourdias T, Moreau JF, Barreau X, Dousset V. Perianeurysmal brain inflammation after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(10):1930–4.
Hassan T, Hamimi A. Successful endovascular management of brain aneurysms presenting with mass effect and cranial nerve palsy. Neurosurg Rev. 2013;36(1):87–97. discussion 97
Wang Z, Tian Z, Li W, et al. Variation of mass effect after using a flow diverter with adjunctive coil embolization for symptomatic Unruptured large and Giant intracranial aneurysms. Front Neurol. 2019;10:1191.
de Korte AM, Aquarius R, Meijer FJA, Boogaarts HD, de Vries J. Intracranial aneurysm expansion might cause neurological deterioration after flow diverter treatment. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e802–10.
Hampton T, Walsh D, Tolias C, Fiorella D. Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(Suppl 1):i51–5.
Szikora I, Marosfoi M, Salomvary B, Berentei Z, Gubucz I. Resolution of mass effect and compression symptoms following endoluminal flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(5):935–9.
Slater LA, Soufan C, Holt M, Chong W. Effect of flow diversion with silk on aneurysm size: a single center experience. Interv Neuroradiol. 2015;21(1):12–8.
Jevsek M, Mounayer C, Seruga T. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms of cavernous and ophthalmic segment of internal carotid artery with flow diverter device pipeline. Radiol Oncol. 2016;50(4):378–84.
Piano M, Valvassori L, Quilici L, Pero G, Boccardi E. Midterm and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(2):408–16.
Kan P, Wakhloo AK, Mokin M, Puri A. Techniques in distal access of wide-necked giant intracranial aneurysms during treatment with flow diversion. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6(Suppl 7):S284–8.
Edwards L, Kota G, Morris PP. The sea anchor technique: a novel method to aid in stent-assisted embolization of giant cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5(6):e39.
Fargen KM, Velat GJ, Lawson MF, Hoh BL, Mocco J. The stent anchor technique for distal access through a large or giant aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5(4):e24.
Snyder KV, Natarajan SK, Hauck EF, et al. The balloon anchor technique: a novel technique for distal access through a giant aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg. 2010;2(4):363–7.
Vollherbst DF, Hohenstatt S, Schonenberger S, Bendszus M, Mohlenbruch MA. WEB as a combined support and embolization device in a giant partially thrombosed donut-shaped aneurysm. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;75:210–2.
Cagnazzo F, Dargazanli C, Lefevre PH, et al. WEB-assisted microwire navigation for the treatment of complex wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: technical note. J Neuroradiol. 2020;47(4):323–7.
Kono K, Okada H, Terada T. A novel neck-sealing balloon technique for distal access through a giant aneurysm. Neurosurgery 2013;73(2 Suppl Operative):onsE302–5; discussion onsE305-306.
Cohen JE, Gomori JM, Moscovici S, Itshayek E. Balloon-guided navigation technique to perform stenting in an acutely angled anterior cerebral artery. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(3):452–4.
Fischer VE, Tavakoli S, Rodriguez P, Birnbaum LA, Mascitelli JR. The ricochet-scepter technique: a balloon-assisted technique to achieve outflow access during pipeline-assisted coil embolization of a near-Giant internal carotid artery ophthalmic aneurysm. World Neurosurg. 2020;145:51–6.
Hauck EF, Natarajan SK, Langer DJ, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI. Retrograde trans-posterior communicating artery snare-assisted rescue of lost access to a foreshortened pipeline embolization device: complication management. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(2 Suppl Operative):495–502.
Miyachi S, Matsubara N, Izumi T, et al. The 'one and a half round microcatheterization technique' for stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysm: technical case series. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(5):357–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Case Presentation
Case Presentation
Case 11.1 Intravascular Flow Diversion Treatment for Large/Giant Aneurysms
Case Pearls
-
1.
Initial FDA-approved indication for PED includes large or giant wide-necked ICA aneurysm from the petrous to the superior hypophyseal segments.
-
2.
The new indication expands to small or medium, wide-necked brain aneurysms from the petrous to the terminus of ICA in 2019.
Case 11.2 FD Device Plus Additional Coiling for Large Supraglenoid ICA Aneurysm
Case Pearls
-
1.
Addition of coiling to FD embolization of large wide-neck aneurysm is preferred by many providers.
-
2.
Added coiling is believed to facilitate the thrombosis of the aneurysm.
-
3.
Coils occupy the aneurysm space and decrease the fresh clot size and risk of delayed aneurysm rupture.
Case 11.3 Mechanical Support for FD Device From Additional Coil Mass
Case Pearls
Mechanical support from additional coil mass can be pivotal in two situations:
-
Large aneurysm with parent artery convex toward the dome carries the risk of collapse of the FD stent into the anuerysm sac.
-
For large aneurysms located more distal in the paraclinoid ICA, the distal landing zone for the FD stent may not be long enough to safely hold the FD device. In a ruptured situation, the support from the additional coil mass is more important as vasospasm can squeeze the stent into the aneurysm sac.
Case 11.4 Destructive Treatment of the Distal Large Aneurysm
Case Pearls
-
1.
For distal large aneurysm/or small aneurysm, parent vessel sacrifice can be the treatment option if located beyond the major perforator segment.
-
2.
Baby or kids can tolerate the destructive treatment better than adult.
-
3.
Simple treatment is better for the infant from the radiation injury standpoint.
Case 11.5 Management of Large Active Bleeding Aneurysm
Case Pearls
-
1.
Early re-rupture (within 24 hours from initial rupture) is more common in the large/giant aneurysms.
-
2.
The outcome of early re-rupture is usually dismal.
-
3.
Intraoperative bleeding during diagnostic angiogram is rare. Quick coiling if possible is a practical and effective option.
-
4.
Balloon or coil occlusion of the parent artery is the last option.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ren, Z. (2022). Large and Giant Aneurysms. In: Eight Aneurysms. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97216-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97216-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97215-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97216-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)