Abstract
The classification of the brain aneurysms is essential to guiding treatment planning, stratifying procedure-associated risks, and predicting treatment outcome. The principles for surgical and endovascular treatment of brain aneurysms differ from each other. The aneurysm’s location plays a pivotal role in choosing the strategy of the surgical treatment/clipping, whereas morphology is the most crucial factor for endovascular treatment. Correspondingly, the outcome and result of the endovascular treatment are also highly related to the aneurysm morphology. A redesigned classification of the brain aneurysm emphasizing the morphology of the aneurysms will likely help improve endovascular treatment. Therefore, based on the anatomic morphological features, we classified the intracranial/extracranial aneurysms into eight catigories and discussed specific treatment strategies and techniques for each one.
This chapter describes the following eight types/categories:
-
1.
Narrow-neck aneurysm.
-
2.
Wide-neck aneurysm.
-
3.
Blood blister/small aneurysm.
-
4.
Fusiform/dissecting aneurysm.
-
5.
Recurrent/residual aneurysm.
-
6.
Large and giant aneurysm.
-
7.
Infectious aneurysm (mycotic aneurysm).
-
8.
Pseudoaneurysm and artery injury.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005;366(9488):809–17.
Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013;267(3):858–68.
Asnafi S, Rouchaud A, Pierot L, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Kallmes DF. Efficacy and safety of the woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(12):2287–92.
Gawlitza M, Soize S, Barbe C, et al. Aneurysm characteristics, study population, and endovascular techniques for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in a large, prospective, multicenter cohort: results of the analysis of recanalization after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysm study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(3):517–23.
Froelich JJ, Cheung N, de Lange JA, Monkhorst J, Carr MW, DeLeacy R. Residuals, recurrences and re-treatment after endovascular repair of intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective methodological comparison. Interv Neuroradiol. 2020;26(1):45–54.
Borggrefe J, Behme D, Mpotsaris A, Weber W. Complications associated with cerebral aneurysm morphology in balloon-assisted coil embolization of ruptured and Unruptured aneurysms-a single-center analysis of 116 consecutive cases. World Neurosurg. 2016;91:483–9.
Songsaeng D, Geibprasert S, ter Brugge KG, Willinsky R, Tymianski M, Krings T. Impact of individual intracranial arterial aneurysm morphology on initial obliteration and recurrence rates of endovascular treatments: a multivariate analysis. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(4):994–1002.
Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke. 2003;34(6):1398–403.
Gallas S, Pasco A, Cottier JP, et al. A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(7):1723–31.
Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, et al. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT). Stroke. 2007;38(5):1538–44.
Ries T, Siemonsen S, Thomalla G, Grzyska U, Zeumer H, Fiehler J. Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(9):1755–61.
Tateshima S, Murayama Y, Gobin YP, Duckwiler GR, Guglielmi G, Vinuela F. Endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms using Guglielmi detachable coils: anatomic and clinical outcomes in 73 patients from a single institution. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(6):1332–9; discussion 1339-1342.
Vallee JN, Aymard A, Vicaut E, Reis M, Merland JJ. Endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: predictors of immediate and long-term results with multivariate analysis 6-year experience. Radiology. 2003;226(3):867–79.
Sadato A, Adachi K, Hayakawa M, Kato Y, Hirose Y. Effects of anatomic characteristics of aneurysms on packing density in endovascular coil embolization: analysis of a single center's experience. Neurosurg Rev. 2016;39(1):109–14; discussion 114.
Damiano RJ, Tutino VM, Paliwal N, et al. Aneurysm characteristics, coil packing, and post-coiling hemodynamics affect long-term treatment outcome. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(7):706–13.
Park YK, Bae HJ, Cho DY, Choi JH, Kim BS, Shin YS. Risk factors for recurrence and retreatment after endovascular treatment of intracranial saccular aneurysm larger than 8 mm. Acta Neurochir. 2019;161(5):939–46.
Fischer S, Perez MA, Kurre W, Albes G, Bazner H, Henkes H. Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of intra- and extracranial fusiform and dissecting aneurysms: initial experience and long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2014;75(4):364–74; discussion 374.
Lozupone E, Piano M, Valvassori L, et al. Flow diverter devices in ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(4):1037–43.
Kuhn AL, Kan P, Massari F, et al. Endovascular reconstruction of unruptured intradural vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(10):1048–51.
Munich SA, Cress MC, Rangel-Castilla L, et al. Neck remnants and the risk of aneurysm rupture after endovascular treatment with coiling or stent-assisted coiling: much ado about nothing? Neurosurgery. 2019;84(2):421–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ren, Z. (2022). Why do We Classify the Brain Aneurysms into Eight Categories?. In: Eight Aneurysms. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97216-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97216-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97215-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97216-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)