Abstract
This chapter applies our anti-commodification analysis of animal ethics (Clipsham and Fulfer, Ethics, Policy & Environment 19 (3): 285–300, 2016) to the following question: When is it ethically acceptable to use animals to generate a profit? We begin by explaining the anti-commodification principle, which claims that there is something prima facie morally problematic with the commodification of nonhuman animals. We then motivate our decision to employ this specific ethical principle to help us distinguish between ethically permissible uses of animals in business from those uses which are not permissible. Finally, we apply the anti-commodification principle to three different industries that profit from the use, exchange, or enjoyment of animals. First, we turn to a discussion of the animal entertainment industry and point to the ways that this industry could potentially involve or avoid problematic animal commodification. Second, we explore the ways that animal commodification often arises in the animal companion (or “pet”) industry. We then close with a discussion of what would have to be true of animal agribusiness for it to be free of problematic animal commodification.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Hereafter we will refer to nonhuman animals as “animals.” We choose this language for ease of use, rather than in adherence to a descriptive or normative hierarchy between human and nonhuman animals.
- 2.
The third prominent approach to animal ethics is feminist care ethics, but we do not consider this approach in this chapter.
- 3.
Contra Coulter (2016), who is suspicious that contexts of profit might render animal’s work more akin to slavery (91), the anti-commodification principle is consistent with profit-generating use of animals as long as they are not problematically commodified.
- 4.
Although the language of “pet” is ubiquitous among animal lovers, many ethicists prefer the language “companion animal” to emphasize the morally problematic hierarchy that elevates humans over animals and obscures the relations of dominance humans necessarily wield over animals with whom they share their homes (Overall 2017). We use both terms interchangeably.
- 5.
Commodification is also part of the historical context of a companion rat, as pet rats tend to be bred from the same stock as laboratory rats (Burt 2006, 134–35).
- 6.
The Humane Society of the United States. 2018.
References
Adams, Carol J. 1990/2017. The sexual politics of meat. New York: Bloomsbury.
Bok, Hilary. 2002. Cloning companion animals is wrong. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 5 (3): 233–238.
Burt, Jonathan. 2006. Rat. London: Reaktion Books.
Clipsham, Patrick. 2017. Carnivorous companions and the vegetarian’s dilemma. Between the Species 20 (1): 2–24.
Clipsham, Patrick, and Katy Fulfer. 2016. An anti-commodification defense of veganism. Ethics, Policy & Environment 19 (3): 285–300.
Coulter, Kendra. 2016. Animals, work, and the promise of interspecies solidarity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Daly, Natasha. 2017. Why all of America’s circus animals could soon be free. National Geographic, May 20. news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/05/wildlife-watch-ringling-circus-animal-welfare-photography/. Accessed 19 March 2018.
Donaldson, Sue, and Will Kymlicka. 2011. Zoopolis. A political theory of animal rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fenton, Andrew. 2014. Can a chimp say “no”? Reenvisioning chimpanzee dissent in harmful research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23: 130–139.
Hallmark. 2018. About kitten bowl. hallmarkchannel.com/kitten-bowl/about-kitten-bowl. Accessed 19 March 2018.
Harvey, Jean. 2017. Companion and assistance animals: Benefits, welfare safeguards, and relationships. In Pets and people, ed. Christine Overall, 3–20. New York: Oxford University Press.
Humane Society of the United States. 2018. Farm animal statistics: Slaughter totals. humanesociety.org/news/resources/research/stats_slaughter_totals.html. Accessed 19 March 2018.
Jamieson, Dale. 1985. Against zoos. In Defense of Animals, ed. Peter Singer, 108–117. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Kantin, Holly, and David Wendler. 2015. Is there a role for assent or dissent in animal research? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24: 459–472.
Kornberg Letizia. 2014. Elephants: For our respect, not our amusement. Star Tribune, July 22. http://www.startribune.com/elephants-for-our-respect-not-our-amusement/268190182/. Accessed 8 Nov 2017.
Levitt, Fern. 2018. Interview with Mariann Sullivan. Our Hen House, March 3. http://www.ourhenhouse.org/2018/03/episode-425-lani-muelrath-fern-levitt/. Accessed 31 March 2018.
Engel, Mylan Jr. 2012. The commonsense case against animal experimentation. In The ethics of animal research: Exploring the controversy, ed. Jeremy Garret, 215–236. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Malisow Craig. 2015. Animal welfare group doesn’t want you to ride elephants at the Texas renaissance festival. Houston Press, November 20. http://www.houstonpress.com/news/animal-welfare-group-doesnt-want-you-to-ride-elephants-at-the-texas-renaissance-festival-7942658. Accessed 8 Nov 2017.
McMullen, Steven. 2015. Is capitalism to blame? Animal lives in the marketplace. Journal of Animal Ethics 5 (2): 126–134.
McMullen, Steven. 2016. Animals and the economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
O’Neill, Onora. 1997. Environmental values, anthropocentrism and species. Environmental Values 6: 127–142.
Overall, Christine. 2017. Introduction. In Pets and people, ed. Christine Overall, xvii-xxv. New York: Oxford University Press.
Parks, Jennifer. 2017. ‘Lassie, come home!’ Ethical concerns about companion animal cloning. In Pets and people, ed. Christine Overall, 143–156. New York: Oxford University Press.
Regan, Tom. 1983. The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Regan, Tom. 1995. Are zoos morally defensible? In Ethics on the ark: zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation, ed. B. Norton, Michael Hutchins, Elizabeth F. Stevens and Terry L. Maple, 38–51. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Rossi, John. 2017. Our whimsy, their welfare: On the ethics of pedigree-breeding. In Pets and people, ed. Christine Overall, 111–126. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rulli, Tina. 2017. For dog’s sake, adopt! In Pets and people, ed. Christine Overall, 172–186. New York: Oxford University Press.
Selk, Avi. 2018. SeaWorld’s CEO promised to end the ‘Blackfish’ fallout. He didn’t. Now he’s gone. The Washington Post, February 27. washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2018/02/27/seaworlds-ceo-promised-to-end-the-blackfish-fallout-he-didnt-and-just-resigned/?utm_term=.6e2863754d2c. Accessed 19 March 2018.
Singer, Peter. 1975/2009. Animal liberation. New York: Harper Collins.
Torres, Bob. 2007. Making a killing: The political economy of animal rights. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
Warren, Mary Anne. 1986. Difficulties with the strong animal rights position. Between the Species 2 (4): 163–173.
Wilkie, Rhoda M. 2010. Livestock/deadstock: Working with farm animals from birth to slaughter. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Wyckoff, Jason. 2014. Toward justice for animals. Journal of Social Philosophy 45: 539–553.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fulfer, K., Clipsham, P. (2022). Are Animals Always Commodified in the Context of Business?. In: Thomas, N. (eds) Animals and Business Ethics. The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97142-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97142-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97141-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97142-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)