Abstract
The design of office spaces and office architecture has received increased attention over the last decades. However, studies on work organisations predominantly approach the design of work environments from an instrumentalist perspective in which spatial configurations are strategically deployed in order to optimise work performances and increase productivity. Going beyond this instrumentalist view, I develop a concept of the micropolitics of organisational aestheticisation. Drawing on empirical data from a research project on the performativity of contemporary office architecture, I show how the (re-)design of office spaces is a heterogeneous and contingent process. Turning to the micropolitics of office space makes apparent, that organisational spaces with their aesthetics cannot merely be seen as a predetermined technology, strategically instituted by management to subtly “govern” work practices. Instead, institutional space is performed in the transgressive and dynamic interplay of material and discursive pre-figurations and the diverse and contingent practices, interpretations, and subjectifications that emanate from them. The turn to micropolitics and performativity subverts dichotomous distinctions between strategies and tactics from organisational sociology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Quotes from the German corpus and from the ethnography have been translated by the author.
- 2.
Details like names and specifics of the location have been changed to preserve anonymity. For a more detailed account of this case, see Adler (2017).
References
Adler, David. 2017. “Die Entstehung einer Lounge: Ästhetisierung als praktischer Vollzug.” In Ästhetisierung der Arbeit: Empirische Kulturanalysen des kognitiven Kapitalismus, edited by Ove Sutter, and Valeska Flor, 33–49. Münster: Waxmann.
Allen, Thomas J., and Gunter W. Henn. 2007. The Organization and Architecture of Innovation: Managing the Flow of Technology. Abingdon: Routledge.
Austin, John L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Towards an Understanding of how Matter comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Societ 28 (3): 801–31.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1995. The Panopticon Writings. London: Verso.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Braverman, Harry. 1998. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
Bröckling, Ulrich. 2016. The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Burns, Tom. 1961. “Micropolitics: Mechanisms of Institutional Change.” Administrative Science Wuarterly 6 (2): 257–281.
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York, NY: Routledge.
Callon, Michel. 2007. “What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative?” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 311–357. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Certeau, Michel de. 1990. “Arts de Faire.” Vol. 1 of L’Invention du Quotidien. Paris: Édition Gallimard.
Clarke, Adele E. 2003. “Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn.” Symbolic Interaction 26 (4): 554–576.
Clegg, Stewart, and Fiona Wilson. 1990. “Power, Technology and Flexibility in Organizations.” The Sociological Review 38 (1): S223–S273.
Dale, Karen, and Gibson Burrell. 2008. The Spaces of Organisation and the Organisation of Space: Power, Identity and Materiality at Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Derrida, Jacques. 1988. “Signature Event Context.” In Limited Inc, 1–21. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Dyk, Silke van, Antje Langer, Felicitas Macgilchrist, Daniel Wrana, and Alexander Ziem. 2014. “Discourse and Beyond? Zum Verhältnis von Sprache, Materialität und Praxis.” In Diskursforschung: Ein Interdisziplinäres Handbuch Volume I, edited by Johannes Angermuller, Martin Nonhoff, Eva Herschinger, Felicitas Macgilchrist, Martin Reisigl, Juliette Wedl, Daniel Wrana, and Alexander Ziem, 347–63. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Vintage.
Foucault, Michel. 2004a. Naissance de la Biopolitique: Cours au Collège de France, 1978–1979. Paris: Seuil/Gallimard (Édition Hautes Études).
Foucault, Michel. 2004b. Sécurité, Territoire, Population: Cours au Collège de France. 1977–1978. Paris: Seuil/Gallimard (Édition Hautes Études).
Galloway, Lee. 1922. Office Management: Its Principles and Practice. New York, NY: The Ronald.
Geberzahn, Wilhelm Otto, and Peter Redemann. 1995. Der Arbeitsplatz im Büro: Aspekte der Modernen Bürogestaltung, 2nd edited by Landsberg/Lech: Verlag Moderne Industrie.
Gerhardt, Astrid. 2014. Bürowelt: Effizienz durch Architektur: Der Mensch und sein Wohlbefinden im gestalteten Arbeitsplatzumfeld. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
Gond, Jean-Pascal, Laure Cabantous, Nancy Harding, and Mark Learminth. 2016. “What Do We Mean by Performativity in Organizational and Management Theory? The Uses and Abuses of Performativity.” International Journal of Management Reviews 18 (4): 440–63.
Hall, Stuart. 1977. “Re-Thinking the ‘Base-and-Superstructure’ Metaphor.” In The Communist University of London: Papers on Class, Hegemony and Party, edited by Jon Bloomfield, 43–72. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Klug, Tina, Regine Henn, and Rudi Schniede. 2005. “Büroarbeit im Wandel.” In BürobauAtlas: Grundlagen, Planung, Technologie, Arbeitsplatzqualität, edited by Johann Eisele and Bettina Staniek, 10–19. München: Callwey.
Law, John, and Vicky Singleton. 2000. “Performing Technology’s Stories: On Social Constructivism, Performance, and Performativity.” Technology and Culture 41 (4): 765–775.
Macgilchrist, Felicitas, and Tom Van Hout. 2011. “Ethnographic Discourse Analysis and Social Science.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12 (1): Art. 18.
Messedat, Jons. 2005. Corporate Architecture: Development, Concepts, Strategies. Stuttgart: Avedition.
Mintzberg, Henry. 1983. Power in and around Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nonhoff, Martin. 2010. “Hegemonieanalyse: Theorie, Methode und Forschungspraxis.” In Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse, vol. 2, edited by Reiner Keller, Andreas Hirseland, Werner Schneider, and Willy Viehöver, 299–331. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
O’Malley, Pat, Lorna Weir, and Clifford Shearing. 1997. “Governmentality, Criticism, Politics.” Economy and Society 26 (4): 501–517.
Porsché, Yannik. 2018. Public Representations of Immigrants in Museums: Exhibition and Exposure in France and Germany. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reckwitz, Andreas. 2017. The Invention of Creativity: Modern Society and the Culture of the New. Cambridge: Polity.
Scheffer, Thomas. 2007. “On Procedual Discursivation: Or How Local Utterances are Turned into Binding Facts.” Language and Communication 27 (1): 1–27.
Schittich, Christian, Steffi Lenzen, Sophie Karst, Michaela Linder, and Eva Schönbrunner. 2013. “Preface.” In DETAIL Best of Office, edited by Christian Schittich, Steffi Lenzen, Sophie Karst, Michaela Linder, and Eva Schönbrunner, 4–5. Munich: Edition DETAIL.
Schumacher, Patrik, and Christian Roger. 2001. “After Ford.” In Stalking Detroit, edited by Georgia Daskalakis, Charles Waldheim, and Jason Young, 48–56. Barcelona: Actar.
Strauss, Anselm L., and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thompson, Paul, and Stephen Ackroyd. 1995. “All Quiet on the Workplace Front? A Critique of Recent Trends in British Industrial Sociology.” Sociology 29 (4): 615–633.
Thompson, Paul, and David McHugh. 2009. Work Organization: A Critical Approach, 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
von Clausewitz, Carl. 1873. On War. London: N. Trübner.
Wrana, Daniel. 2012. “Diesseits von Diskursen und Praktiken: Methodologische Bemerkungen zu einem Verhältnis.” In Feld und Theorie: Herausforderungen erziehungswissenschaftlicher Ethnographie, edited by Barbara Friebertshäuser, Helga Kelle, Heike Boller, Sabin Bollig, Christina Huf, Antje Langer, Marion Ott, and Sophia Richter, 185–200. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adler, D. (2022). Beyond Strategy and Tactics: On the Micropolitics of Organisational Aesthetics. In: Porsché, Y., Scholz, R., Singh, J.N. (eds) Institutionality. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96969-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96969-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96968-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96969-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)