Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theoretical and Legal Conditions of Spatial Management Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spatial Planning in Poland

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Geography ((BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY))

Abstract

The chapter will present how the spatial management system's problem is recognized and distinguished in the literature on the subject in various European countries. Such issues were classified, and their scale (national/supranational) was carried out. The key points from the analyzed perspective, including the local view of spatial policy, as well as the issue of social participation in spatial planning, were considered in particular. The characteristics of the leading European models of spatial management systems and the solutions adopted within these models, especially those relating to the scope of applying individual spatial policy tools, will match the classification made in this way. The chapter mainly focuses on such issues as the role of local spatial development plans in the spatial development system, public participation, integrated development planning, public interest, and flexibility in spatial planning. The context of informal institutions in spatial planning will also be considered. The optimal (effective, rational, efficient) way of addressing these issues in the spatial management system is also related to legal conditions analysis. Therefore, the chapter will also analyze how specific legal regulations can deal with spatial management systems' problems and challenges: the role of these regulations, which thematic areas they should undertake, and which should not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alfasi N, Migdalovich E (2020) Losing faith in planning. Land Use Policy 97:104790.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104790

  • Alfasi N, Portugali J (2007) Planning rules for a self-planned city. Plan Theory 6(2):164–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207077587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alterman R (2010) Takings international: a comparative perspective on land use regulations and compensation rights. American Bar Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Altrock U, Güntner S, Huning S, Peters D (2016) Spatial planning and urban development in the new EU member states—Between adjustment and reinvention. In: Altrock U, Güntner S, Huning S, Peters D (eds) Spatial planning and urban development in the new EU member states. From adjustment to reinvention. Routledge, London-New York, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Angiello G (2020) Toward greener and pandemic-proof cities: Italian cities policy responses to Covid-19 pandemic. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment 13(2):271–280. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/7047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardiansah A, Fahmi S (2018) The implementation of the law on spatial planning in Pekanbaru, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 175:012079.https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012079

  • Berisha E, Cotella G, Janin-Rivolin U, Solly A (2020) Spatial governance and planning systems and the public control of spatial development: A European typology. Eur Plan Stud 29(1):181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschetto P (2020) Covid-19 and simplification of urban planning tools. The residual plan. TeMA—Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, Special Issue:9–16. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/6845

  • Brueckner JK (2009) Government land use interventions: An economic analysis. In: Lall SV, Freire M, Yuen B (eds) Urban land markets: improving land management for successful urbanization. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Budiyono H, Firmansyah A, Neta Y (2018) Harmonization of village development planning law in Lampung Coastal in the spatial planning regime. J Law Policy Glob 70:16–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantos JO (2010) Spatial planning processes, territorial planning law and flood risk in the region of Valencia (Spain). In: Menoni S (ed) Risks challenging publics, scientists and governments. CRC Press, London, p 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10825

  • Chiodelli F, Moroni S (2017) Planning, pluralism and religious diversity: Critically reconsidering the spatial regulation of mosques in Italy starting from a much debated law in the Lombardy region. Cities 62:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi C, Kang B (2014) Network analysis for the connectivity between spatial planning law and environment law and its implications. Journal of Environmental Policy 13(2):39–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darin M (2016) Spatial planning law as controller of city space utilization in the sustainable development context. J Law Policy Glob 56:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • de Olde C (2015) Moving forward comparative planning studies: Beyond planning cultures and institutionalism. Paper presented at the RC21 International Conference on ‘The ideal city: between myth and reality. Representations, policies, contradictions and challenges for tomorrow's urban life’, Urbino (Italy), 27–29 August 2015. http://www.rc21.org/en/conferences/urbino2015/. Accessed 4 August 2021

  • Debrunner G, Hartmann T (2020) Strategic use of land policy instruments for affordable housing. Coping with social challenges under scarce land conditions in Swiss cities. Land Use Policy 99:104993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104993

  • Ehrlich MV, Hilber CAL, Schöni O (2018) Institutional settings and urban sprawl: Evidence from Europe. J Hous Econ 42(C):4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2017.12.002

  • ESPON (2009) ESPON Project 2.3.2. Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies From EU to Local Level. Final Report. ESPON, European Commission, Luxembourg. https://www.espon.eu/programme/projects/espon-2006/policy-impact-projects/governance-territorial-and-urban-policies. Accessed 4 August 2021

  • European Commission (1999) The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi A (2018) Historical Institutionalist account of European spatial planning. Plan Perspect 33(4):507–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2018.1437554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fürst D (2009) Planning cultures en route to a better understanding of the planning process? In: Knieling J, Othengrafen F (eds) Planning cultures in Europe. Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning. Routledge, London: 23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Getimis P, Reimer M, Blotevogel H (2014) Conclusion: multiple trends of continuity and change. In: Reimer M, Getimis P, Blotevogel H (eds) Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe. Routledge, London, pp 278–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase A (2020) Covid-19 as a social crisis and justice challenge for cities. Frontiers in Sociology 5:583638. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.583638

  • Hamdan M (2020) Law enforcement on the issuance of construction permits violating spatial planning in Medan City. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 452:012073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/452/1/012073

  • Hendler P (2015) The history of spatial planning and land use in South Africa. In: The Urban Land Paper Series—Volume 1. South African Cities Network, Braamfontein, p 21–33. Available at https://www.sacities.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Urban-Land-Series-Vol-1-Released-2015-3.pdf. Accessed 6 December 2021

  • Hoch C (2019) Pragmatic spatial planning. Practical Theory for Professionals. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hołuj A (2018) Economic and ecological externalities in spatial planning. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Oeconomica 4(336):137–155. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.336.09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin EG, Bockstael NE (2001) The problem of identifying land use spillovers: Measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. Am J Agric Econ 83(3):698–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janin-Rivolin U (2012) Planning systems as institutional technologies: A proposed conceptualization and the implications for comparison. Plan Pract Res 27(1):63–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiessling N, Putz M (2020) Assesing the regional governance capacities of spatial planning: The case of the canton of Zurich. Reg Stud Reg Sci 7(1):183–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1776631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok N, Monkkonen P, Quigley JM (2014) Land use regulations and the value of land and housing: an intra-metropolitan analysis. J Urban Econ 81(C):136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2014.03.004

  • Lai S, Leone F, Zoppi C (2020) Covid-19 and spatial planning. TeMA—Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, Special Issue:231–246. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/6846

  • Larsson G (2006) Spatial planning systems in Western Europe: An overview. IOS Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFeely S (2016) Opportunism over strategy: a history of regional policy and spatial planning in Ireland. Int Plan Stud 21(4):377–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2016.1162403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowski T (2010) Planowanie przestrzenne i instrumenty jego realizacji w świetle teorii ułomnych rynków. In: Lorens P, Martyniuk–Pęczek J (eds) Zarządzanie rozwojem przestrzennym miast. Wydawnictwo Urbanista, Gdańsk

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowski T (2013) Teoria sprawiedliwości i interes publiczny jako podstawa budowania regulacyjnego systemu planowania przestrzennego: konceptualizacja problemu. Studia KPZK 153(1):12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsushita T, Meguro K, Kubota A (2018) Comparative study of planning history, spatial development and sociological significance of the back alley in Yangon and Singapore. Paper presented at The 18th International Planning History Society Conference, Yokohama (Japan), July 2018. Available at https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268414901.pdf. Accessed 06 Dec 2021

  • Moroni S (2007) Planning, liberty and the rule of law. Plan Theory 6(2):146–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207077586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moroni S, Buitelaar E, Sorel N, Cozzolino S (2020) Simple planning rules for complex urban problems: Toward legal certainty for spatial flexibility. J Plan Educ Res 40(3):320–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18774122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller- D (2015) The present move to reforms in spatial planning should also include the forest law. Schweiz Z Forstwes 166(4):223–225. https://doi.org/10.3188/szf.2015.0223

  • Muñoz D, Salas IM, Cuadrado JB (2017) International comparison of the changing dynamics of governance approaches to land development and their results for public value capture. Cities 71:123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.05.012

  • Muñoz D, Tasan-Kok T (2010) Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public value capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands. Eur Plan Stud 18(7):1097–1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003744191

  • Muñoz D (2014) Urban governance, property rights, land readjustment and public value capturing. Eur Urban Reg Stud 21(1):60–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412440543

  • Nadin V (2012) International comparative planning methodology: Introduction to the theme issue. Plan Pract Res 27(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.669928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadin V, Fernández-Maldonado A, Zonneveld W, Stead D, Dąbrowski M, Piskorek K, Sarkar A, Schmitt P, Smas L, Cotella G, Rivolin U, Solly A, Berisha E, Pede E, Seardo B, Komornicki T, Goch K, Bednarek-Szczepańska M, Degórska B, Szejgiec-Kolenda B, Śleszyński P, Lüer C, Böhme K, Nedovic-Budic Z, Williams B, Varghese J, Colic N, Knaap G, Csák L, Faragó L, Mezei C, Kovács I, Pamer Z, Reimer M, Münter A (2018) COMPASS—Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe Applied Research 2016–2018 Final Report. ESPON, European Commission, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadin V, Stead D (2008) European spatial planning systems, social, models and learning. disP—The Planning Review 44(172):35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001

  • Nadin V, Stead D, Dąbrowski M, Fernandez-Maldonado AM (2020) Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe. Reg Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman P, Thornley A (1996) Urban planning in Europe. International competition, national systems and planning projects. Routledge, London-New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak M (2017) The role and effects of case—Low in spatial competition. An analysis of selected cases. Biuletyn KPZK PAN 265:172–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak M, Gagakuma D, Blaszke M (2020) Spatial management systems in Ghana and Poland—Comparison of solutions and selected problems. World of Real Estate Journal. Świat Nieruchomości 1(111):59–77. https://doi.org/10.14659/WOREJ.2020.111.04

  • Pisano C (2020) Strategies for post-COVID cities: An insight to Paris En Commun and Milano 2020. Sustainability 12(15):5883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purkarthofer E, Humer A, Mattila H (2021) Subnational and dynamic conceptualisations of planning culture: the culture of regional planning and regional planning cultures in Finland. Plan Theory Pract. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1896772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer M, Getimis P, Blotevogel H (2014) Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe: A comparative perspective. In: Reimer M, Getimis P, Blotevogel H (eds) Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe. Routledge, London-New York, pp 1–20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Runhaar H, Driessen PPJ, Soer L (2009) Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration: an assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands. Environ Plann B Plann Des 36(3):417–431. https://doi.org/10.1068/b34052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos A, Virtudes A (2020) Spatial planning system: Acomparative analysis East-Timor/Portugal. IOP ConfSer Earth Environ Sci 609:012097. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012097

  • Savini F (2016) Don’t blame public law: The legal articulation of certainty in Amsterdam land-use planning. Town Plan Rev 87(4):459–479. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segura S, Pedregal B (2017) Monitoring and evaluation framework for spatial plans: a Spanish case study. Sustainability 9(10):1706. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shandas V, von Haaren C, Shimizu H, Alterman R, Lovett AA (2019) Perspectives from outside the EU: The influence of legal and planning frameworks on landscape planning. In: von Haaren C, Lovett AA, Albert C (eds) Landscape planning with ecosystem services. Springer, Cham, p 463–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1681-7

  • Slaev AD, Kovachev A, Nozharova B, Daskalova D, Nikolov P, Petrov P (2019) Overcoming the failures of citizen participation: The relevance of the liberal approach in planning. Plan Theory 18(4):448–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219848472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Śleszyński P, Kowalewski A, Markowski T, Legutko P, Nowak M (2020) The contemporary economic costs of spatial chaos: evidence from Poland. Land 9:214. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9070214

  • Stead D (2021) Conceptualizing the policy tools of spatial planning. J Plan Lit 36(3):297–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412221992283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead D, de Vries J, Tasan-Kok T (2017) Planning cultures and histories: Influences of the evolution of planning systems and spatial development patterns. In: Stead D, de Vries J, Tasan-Kok T (eds) Planning cultures and histories. The evolution of planning systems and spatial development patterns, Routledge, Londyn, p 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele W, Ruming K (2012) Flexibility versus certainty: Unsettling the land-use planning Shibboleth in Australia. Plan Pract Res 27(2):155–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.662670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Straalen FM (2013) The relationship between land policy and spatial planning: An explanatory history of the interaction of land policy and spatial planning in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the International Academic Association on Planning, Law and Property Rights, Portland, OR (USA), 13–15 February 2013. https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/the-relationship-between-land-policy-and-spatial-planning-an-expl. Accessed 06 December 2021

  • Tarakçı S, Türk ŞŞ (2020) Shaping of flexibility in urban renewal legal sources in Turkey and its effect on practices. International Journal of Architecture and Planning 8(2):652–671. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewdwr-Jones M (2004) Spatial planning: Principles, practices and cultures. Journal of Planning Law 57(5):560–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanheusden B (2010) The relation between spatial planning law and soil remediation law. J Eur Environ Plan Law 7(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/161372710X12676263561755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterhout B, Faludi AKF, Stead D, Zonneveld W, Milder J, Nadin V (2009) Reinventing spatial planning in a borderless Europe: emergent themes. Paper prepared for the 23rd Congress of the Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP) ‘Why can’t the future be more like the past’, Liverpool, UK, 15–18 July 2009. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:bd32c582-e0a7-4725-883a-52e50a13f0fc. Accessed 4 August 2021

  • Williams R, Wood B (2018) Urban land and property market in The United Kingdom. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yenice MS (2012) Planning history and spatial development of Konya City, Erciyes University Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 28(4):343–350. Available at http://fbedergi.erciyes.edu.tr/index.php/fen-bilimleri-dergisi/article/view/249. Accessed 6 December 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Real Estate Department, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland

    Maciej J. Nowak

  2. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

    Przemysław Śleszyński

  3. Department of Public Policy, Warsaw School of Economics (SGH), Warsaw, Poland

    Paulina Legutko-Kobus

Authors
  1. Maciej J. Nowak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Przemysław Śleszyński
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paulina Legutko-Kobus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maciej J. Nowak .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nowak, M.J., Śleszyński, P., Legutko-Kobus, P. (2022). Theoretical and Legal Conditions of Spatial Management Systems. In: Spatial Planning in Poland. SpringerBriefs in Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96939-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation