Abstract
In this Chapter, I present a detailed explanation of how to develop, deliver, and evolve poetry workshops. I also discuss why these poetry workshops are an effective format for developing dialogues between scientific and non-scientific audiences, and how they can be used to level hierarchies of intellect.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Nisbet MC, Scheufele DA (2009) What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. Am J Bot 96(10):1767–1778. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041
Lorenz L (2020) Addressing diversity in science communication through citizen social science. J Sci Commun 19(4):A04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.19040204
Van der Sanden MCA, Meijman FJ (2008) Dialogue guides awareness and understanding of science: an essay on different goals of dialogue leading to different science communication approaches. Public Underst Sci 17(1):89–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506067376
Berdahl L, Bourassa M, Bell S et al (2016) Exploring perceptions of credible science among policy stakeholder groups: results of focus group discussions about nuclear energy. Sci Commun 38(3):382–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016647175
Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J et al (2009) Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 59(11):977–984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
Muradova L, Walker H, Colli F (2020) Climate change communication and public engagement in interpersonal deliberative settings: evidence from the Irish citizens’ assembly. Clim Policy 20(10):1322–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1777928
Einsiedel EF, Eastlick DL (2000) Consensus conferences as deliberative democracy: a communications perspective. Sci Commun 21(4):323–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547000021004001
Illingworth S, Jack K (2018) Rhyme and reason-using poetry to talk to underserved audiences about environmental change. Clim Risk Manage 19:120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2018.01.001
Illingworth S (2020) Creative communication–using poetry and games to generate dialogue between scientists and nonscientists. FEBS Lett 594(15):2333–2338. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13891
Jack K, Illingworth S (2017) ‘Saying it without saying it’: using poetry as a way to talk about important issues in nursing practice. J Res Nurs 22(6–7):508–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117715293
Illingworth S, Allen G (2020) Effective science communication, 2nd edn. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol
Watermeyer R, Montgomery C (2018) Public dialogue with science and development for teachers of STEM: linking public dialogue with pedagogic praxis. J Educ Teach 44(1):90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1422621
Illingworth S (2018) Delivering effective science communication: advice from a professional science communicator. Semin Cell Dev Biol 70:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.04.002
Mackay SM, Tan EW, Warren DS (2020) Developing a new generation of scientist communicators through effective public outreach. Commun Chem 3(76). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-020-0315-0
Hsieh G, Kocielnik R (2016) You get who you pay for: The impact of incentives on participation bias. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, p 823. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819936
Blake J, Illingworth S (2015) Interactive and interdisciplinary student work: a facilitative methodology to encourage lifelong learning. Widen Participation Lifelong Learn 17(2):108–118. https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.17.2SI.107
Vygotsky LS (1980) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Dee T, Gershenson S (2017) Unconscious bias in the classroom: evidence and opportunities. Google Inc., Mountain View
Nosek BA, Bar-Anan Y, Sriram N et al (2014) Understanding and using the brief implicit association test: recommended scoring procedures. PLoS ONE 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110938
Staats C (2016) Understanding implicit bias: what educators should know. Am Educ 39(4):29–33
Wain A (2017) Learning through reflection. Br J Midwifery 25(10):662–666. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2017.25.10.662
Gibbs G (1988) Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford Polytechnic Further Education Unit, Oxford
Kolb DA (2015) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development, 2nd edn. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River
Gary R, Freshwater D, Jasper M (2001) Critical reflection in nursing and the helping professions: a user’s guide. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Atkins S, Murphy K (1995) Reflective practice. Nurs Stand 9(45):31–35
Illingworth S, Bell A, Capstick S et al (2018) Representing the majority and not the minority: the importance of the individual in communicating climate change. Geosci Commun 1(1):9–24. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-9-2018
Bassot B (2015) The reflective practice guide: an interdisciplinary approach to critical reflection. Routledge, London
Killick J (2017) Poetry and dementia: a practical guide. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Illingworth, S. (2022). Poetry Workshops. In: Science Communication Through Poetry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96829-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96829-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96828-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96829-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)