Abstract
The study addressed the most important reforms in Pakistan’s federal training institutions and emphasized the country’s primary reform trajectories. The three coordination typologies of HTM, MTM, and NTM were used to categorize major events that occurred during distinct reform periods. The chapter revolves around two major objectives: the rationale for the emergence of federal training institutions and the theoretical explanation of this trend. The purpose of this chapter is descriptive, which is achieved through qualitative data analysis. For this purpose, document analysis is the major source of data analysis. For corroboration of the analysis, the researcher has conducted 5 interviews with the civil servants working at administrative positions in these FTIs. These interviews helped the researcher to validate the interpretations drawn from the document analysis. It was found that the majority of reforms were based on shifting lines of power, forming new agencies, and merging existing ones, all of which led to a hierarchy-type administration. However, there have been few advancements in market-type and network-type management. The reform process was also described through institutional isomorphism in this chapter. The study concluded that public sector organizations are vulnerable to a variety of external forces. The chapter concludes with the contextual identification of the major issues related to policy development and implementation in the public sector in Pakistan.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bouckaert, G., Peters, B., & Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Chen, C., & Chi, S. (2017). Isomorphic diffusion in public sector: Focus on China. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 2017(52), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.52E.1
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2006). Agentification and regulatory reforms. In Autonomy and regulation. Coping with agencies in the modern state (pp. 8–49). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2011). Post-Npm reforms: Whole of government approaches as a new trend. Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management, 21(2015, Feb.), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-1317(2011)0000021006
Cohen, J. (1995). Capacity building in public sector: A focused framework for analysis and action. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 61, 407–422.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
Frumkin, P., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Institutional isomorphism and public sector organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh028
Glynn, M. A., & Abzug, R. (2002). Institutionalizing identity: Symbolic isomorphism and organizational names. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069296
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.590299
Li, J., & Chung, K. (2018). Decomposing isomorphism: What drives similarity in the adoption of new public management? Administration and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718811307
Ministry of Planning Development & Special Initiatives. (2014). Annual Plan 2015–2016, Institutional reforms and Governance. https://www.pc.gov.pk/uploads/docs/Ch17-Institutional-reforms-governance.pdf
Minogue, Martin. & Hulme, David. & Polidano, Charles. & Public Management for the Next Century: an International Conference to Review Trends and Public Management and Governance. (1998). Beyond the new public management: changing ideas and practices in governance. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: E. Elgar.
Overman, S., & van Thiel, S. (2016). Agencification and public sector performance: A systematic comparison in 20 countries. Public Management Review, 18(4), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1028973
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.<strong>51142368</strong>
Pache, A., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
Peters, G. (1992). Government reorganization: A theoretical analysis. International Political Review, 13(2), 199–217.
Pollitt, C., Bathgate, K., Caulfield, J., Smullen, A., & Talbot, C. (2001). Agency fever? Analysis of an international policy fashion. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 3(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012301400791
Pratama, A. B. (2017). Agencification in Asia: Lessons from Thailand, Hong Kong, and Pakistan. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 21(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.23008
Smets, M., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2013). Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66(10), 1279–1309. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84881160342&partnerID=40&md5=15617e545f6a286ab680eb9c35d48832; http://hum.sagepub.com/content/66/10/1279.full.pdf
Wafa, D. (2015). Capacity-building for the transformation of public service: A case of managerial-level public servants in Egypt. Teaching Public Administration, 33(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739414545252
Waheed, S. (1999). Capacity building in public sector organisations. The Pakistan Development Review, 38(4II), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.30541/v38i4iipp.913-934
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Farooqi, M.R., Naveed, S. (2022). Reforms in Federal Training Institutions in Pakistan—An Institutional Perspective. In: Zahra, A., Bouckaert, G., Zafar Iqbal Jadoon, M., Jabeen, N. (eds) Public Sector Reforms in Pakistan. Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96825-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96825-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96824-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96825-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)