Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Enterprise Engineering Series ((TEES))

  • 1304 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter, we clarified the contextual parameters of Enterprise Architecture Management. Addressing the core of EAM implementation, this chapter now describes in detail EAM goals, processes, functions, artifacts, roles, and tools. Thus, after revisiting EAM goals, an EAM process framework is described that provides a comprehensive overview of EAM processes and functions. On the one hand, the framework comprises the EAM cube with core EAM processes. On the other hand, it encompasses supporting processes for enabling and steering the EAM capability. Each process type and its practical implementation are described in detail. Next, EAM artifacts are addressed. After a two-dimensional classification of artifacts, we describe how to create coherent collections of principles. Further artifacts described include, for example, maps of the digital ecosystem, target architectures, and roadmaps. In a similar vein, the tools as well as the EAM organization and roles required to fulfill the EAM processes and capabilities are described in depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlemann, F., Stettiner, E., Messerschmidt, M., & Legner, C. (Eds.). (2011). Strategic enterprise architecture management. Challenges, best practices, and future developments. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpa, G. (1994). General principles of law. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 1: Is. 1, Article 2. Golden Gate University School of Law. Cited from Wikipedia, “Principle”. Accessed June 2021, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle

  • Bente, S., Bombosch, U., & Langade, S. (2012). Collaborative enterprise architecture: Enriching EA with Lean, Agile, and Enterprise 2.0 practices. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, M., & Kitzis, E. (2005). The new CIO leader – Setting the agenda and delivering results. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckl, S. (2011). Developing organization-specific enterprise architecture management functions using a method base. Dissertation Thesis, Technical University Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEAF. (2013, August 01). California Enterprise architecture framework. Version 2.0. California Department of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEAF. (2020a). California enterprise architecture framework – Program. California Department of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEAF. (2020b). California enterprise architecture framework – Portfolio. California Department of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEAF. (2021b). California enterprise architecture framework views. California Department of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greefhorst, D., & Proper, H. (2011). Architecture principles – The cornerstones of enterprise architecture. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., Hammer, M., & Metsisto, T. J. (1989). How executives can shape their company’s information systems. Harvard Business Review, 67(2), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1225/89206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, M., & Winter, R. (2008). Processes for Enterprise application architecture management. In 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Los Alamitos, CA, p. 396. IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanschke, I. (2012). Enterprise architecture management – einfach und effektiv: Ein praktischer Leitfaden für die Einführung von EAM. Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE. (2007). Systems and software engineering – Architecture description. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2007. Cited from Open Group, TOGAF 9.1. Accessed August 2021, from https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf91-doc/arch/chap02.html

  • IEEE. (2019). Software, systems and enterprise – Architecture processes. ISO/IEC/IEEE, 42020, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISACA. (2018). COBIT 2019 framework: Governance and management objectives.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITIL. (2019). 5 ITIL management practices. In ITIL foundation, ITIL 4 edition. TSO (The Stationery Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W. (2012). IT-Unternehmensarchitektur: Von der Geschäftsstrategie zur optimalen IT-Unterstützung (2nd ed.). dpunkt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosroshahi, P. A., Hauder, M., Schneider, A., & Matthes, F. (2015, November). Enterprise architecture management pattern catalog – Version 2.0. Software Engineering for Business Information Systems. Technische Universität München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosroshahi, A., Matthes, F., Gernegroß, M., Hauder, M., & Volkert, S. (2018). Business capability maps: Current practices and use cases for enterprise architecture management. In 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurnia, S., Kotusev, S., Taylor, P., & Dilnutt, R. (2020). Artifacts, activities, benefits and blockers: Exploring enterprise architecture practice in depth. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences | HICSS 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, K. (2006). From enterprise architecture to IT governance – Elements of effective IT management. Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Group. (2020a). Open agile architecture. A standard of the open group. Accessed July 2021, from https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/o-aa-standard-single/

  • Open Group. (2020b). ArchiMate 3.1 Specification. Accessed December 2020, from https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/ArchiMate3-doc/toc.htmlHttps://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/ArchiMate3-doc/chap03.html

  • Open Group. (2020c). The TOGAF Standard. Version 9.2. Accessed December 2020, from https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/

  • Perks, C., & Beveridge, T. (2003). Guide to enterprise IT architecture. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAFe. (2020). Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 5. Accessed January 2020, from https://www.scaledagileframework.com

  • Scheer, A.-W. (1999). ARIS – Business process frameworks (3rd ed.). Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tamm, T., Seddon, P., Shanks, G., & Reynolds, P. (2011). How does enterprise architecture add value to organisations? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28, 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziemann, J. (2019). Architectural content management in agile times – Challenges, requirements and solutions identified in a large enterprise. In C. Draude, M. Lange, & B. Sick (Eds.), Informatik 2019 Workshops, Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI). Gesellschaft für Informatik.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ziemann, J. (2022). EAM Implementation. In: Fundamentals of Enterprise Architecture Management. The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96734-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96734-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96733-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96734-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics