Skip to main content

Online Learning, Students’ Assessment and Educational Neuroscience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Realities, Mobile Systems and Applications (IMCL 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 411))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1492 Accesses

Abstract

Assessment is an important factor in any learning process or context. It is argued that educational assessment can serve as an indicator of the quality of students’ performance and learning outcomes, as a facilitation means for students’ learning, and as an essential parameter for the design and structure of a learning environment. Despite the debate on whether online learning assessment differs completely from the conventional assessment methods or not, it is accepted that it is a key aspect of learning in every context. Diagnostic, formative and summative assessment affect learning outcomes and have an impact on teacher and student roles. Educational neuroscience supports this argument, as well. The present paper investigates the ways and the extent to which educators in Greece used assessment techniques during the online teaching imposed by the pandemic crisis. A qualitative research methodology, based on semi-structured interviews was adopted. Research findings point to the lack of a structured assessment plan during this period and highlight the need for assessment techniques and tools to be part of teachers’ educational design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee B., Trust, T., Bond A.: The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning (2020). https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning. Accessed 09 July 2021

  2. Benson, A.D.: Assessing participant learning in online environments. New Dir. Adult Contin. Educ. 100, 69–78 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Knight, P.: The local practices of assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 31(4), 435–452 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Black, P., William, D.: Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80(2), 139–148 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., Alderman, K.: Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 39(3), 309–328 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boston, C.: The concept of formative assessment. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 8(9) (2002). https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol8/iss1/9/. Accessed 09 July 2021

  7. Weurlander, M., Söderberg, M., Scheja, M., Hult, H., Wernerson, A.: Exploring formative assessment as a tool for learning: students’ experiences of different methods of formative assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 37(6), 747–760 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Samuelowicz, K., Bain, J.D.: Identifying academics’ orientation to assessment practice. High. Educ. 43, 173–201 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carraccio, C., Wolfsthal, S.D., Englander, R., Ferentz, K., Martin, C.: Shifting paradigms: from Flexner to competencies. Acad. Med. 77(5), 361–367 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Joughin, G.: The hidden curriculum revisited: A critical review of research into the influence of summative assessment on learning. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 35(3), 335–345 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibbs, G., Simpson, C.: Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learn. Teach. High. Educ. 1, 3–31 (2004–2005). http://www2.glos.ac.uk/offload/tli/lets/lathe/issue1/articles/simpson.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2021

  12. Kearns, L.R.: Student assessment in online learning: challenges and effective practices. MERLOT J. Online Learn. Teach. 8(3), 198–208 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nicol, D.J., Macfarlane-Dick, D.: Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud. High. Educ. 31(2), 199–218 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sadler, D.R.: Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assess. Educ. 5(1), 77–84 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Scouller, K.: The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. High. Educ. 35(4), 453–472 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gibbs, G.: Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In: Glasner, A., Brown, S. (ed.) Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches, pp. 41–53. SRHE & Open University Press, Buckingham (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reeves, T.C.: Alternative approaches for online learning environments in higher education. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 23(1), 101–111 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Angelo, T.A.: Beginning the dialogue on promoting critical thinking: classroom assessment for critical thinking. Teach. Psychol. 22(1), 6–7 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arend, B.: Course assessment practices and student learning strategies in online courses. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 11(4), 3–13 (2007). http://www.sloanconsortium.org/sites/default/files/v11n4_arend_0.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2021

  20. Gaytan, J., McEwen, B.C.: Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. Am. J. Distance Educ. 21(3), 117–132 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Swan, K.: Virtual interaction: design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Educ. 22(2), 306–331 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ansari, D., Coch, D., De Smedt, B.: Connecting education and cognitive neuroscience: where will the journey take us? Educ. Philos. Theory 43(1), 37–42 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Doukakis, S., Alexopoulos, E.: The role of educational neuroscience in distance learning. Knowledge transformation opportunities. In: Auer, M.E., Centea, D. (eds.) ICBL 2020. AISC, vol. 1314, pp. 159–168. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67209-6_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Hwang, G.-J., Chang, H.-F.: A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Comput. Educ. 56, 1023–1031 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moser, J.S., Schroder, H.S., Heeter, C., Moran, T.P., Lee, Y.H.: Mind your errors: evidence for a neural mechanism linking growth mind-set to adaptive posterror adjustments. Psychol. Sci. 22(12), 1484–1489 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by the European Union and Greece (Partnership Agreement for the Development Framework 2014–2020) under the Regional Operational Pro-gramme Ionian Islands 2014–2020, project title: “Enhancing cognitive abilities of people with Mild Cognitive Impairment through measurable cognitive training—NEUROEDUCATION”, project number: 5016113.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spyridon Doukakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Doukakis, S., Niari, M., Alexopoulos, E., Sfyris, P. (2022). Online Learning, Students’ Assessment and Educational Neuroscience. In: Auer, M.E., Tsiatsos, T. (eds) New Realities, Mobile Systems and Applications. IMCL 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 411. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96296-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96296-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96295-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96296-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics