Skip to main content

Liberalism in Retreat

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aid, Trade and Development

Abstract

The deep crisis that afflicted the developed countries in 2008 created shock waves through the world economy and ushered a new era of economic uncertainty whose implications are not yet fully understood. The prolonged but weak recovery in the US combined with stagnation in several Eurozone countries led many to question the very premises on which the international economic order was based and gave rise to populist and anti-globalization sentiments The emergence of China as a leading global power with a system of “state capitalism” and the reemergence of Russia with a similar system have raised questions about the prospects of liberalism. The final questions were raised by the new US administration whose policies starting in 2016 increased trade protection and bilateralism, and thereby, undermined the global multilateral institutions which the US helped establish in the post-World War II era. Amidst these serious challenges to the liberal economic order, starting in 2020, the global community was to suffer the devastation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This chapter reviews the main global trends in aid, trade, and globalization during the decade 2009–2019 and their impact on sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdel-Malek, T. and B. Koenders, (2011) “Progress Towards More Effective Aid: What Does the Evidence Show? 4th High Level Conference on Aid Effectiveness, https://www.Busanhlf4.org.

  • ACET (2018) Mobilizing and Managing External Finance for Inclusive Growth: Synthesis Report, December 2018, (Accra: ACET).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. (2019) Email, June 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R. (2016) The WTO’s Sixteenth Monitoring Report on Group of 20 (G20) Trade Measures”, Press Briefing 10 November, https://www.wto.org/English/thewto_e/dg_edg_e.htm.

  • Azevedo, R. (2019) The WTO’s Report on G-20 Trade Measures, November 21, 2019, (Geneva: WTO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. (2009) Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade, (New York: Council of Foreign Relations).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall, N. and H. Kharas (2014) The Quality of ODA, Third Edition, (Washington, DC: CGD and Brookings).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandy, L, B. Seidel, and C. Zhang (2016) Aid Effectiveness in Fragile States, Brooke Shear Series No. 5, (Washington, DC: Brookings).

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist, the (2013) “Can the WTO Save Itself from Irrelevance?” 16 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenett, S. J. (2009) Global Trade Alert 1st Report, (London: CEPR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faucett, E. (2014) Liberalism, (Princeton and Oxford: Pricneton University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House (2021), https://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2021.

  • Gelpern, A. et al. (2021) “How China Lends: A rare look into 100 debt contracts with foreign governments” Working Paper 21–7, (Washignton DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Partnership for Effective Development Collaboration (2016) Making Development Co-operation More Effective, (Paris and New York: OECD/UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Partnership for Effective Development Collaboration (2019) Making Development Co-operation More Effective, (Paris and New York: OECD/UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herfkens, E. (2014) “Aid Effectiveness: Lessons Learned- and Forgotten” in (Dutch) S. Vermer, L. Schulpen and R. Ruben Eds. Hoe nu Verder, (Arnhem: LM Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, B. and Petros Mavroides (2020) “To AB or not to AB: Dispute Settlement in WTO Reform” Journal of International Economic Law 23: 703–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, B. and Douglas Nelson (2020) “Rethinking International Subsidy Rues”, World Economy, September 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, D. (2018) Navigation by Judgement, (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, S., C. Reinhart and C. Trebesch (2020) “China’s Overseas Lending and the Looming Developing Country Debt Crisis” VOX , CEPR Policy Portal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer G. et al. (2010) Figuring Out the Doha Round, (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics).

    Google Scholar 

  • IDA (2019) Addressing Debt Vulnerabilities in IDA Countries: Options for IDA 19, (Washington, DC: IDA), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenman, P. and A. Shakow (2010) “Donor Schizophrenia and Aid Effectiveness: The Role of Global Funds”, IDS Practice Paper 2010–01, IDS University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H.F. (2011) Waging Peace in Sudan, (Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalopoulos, C. (2014) Emerging Powers in the WTO, (Houndsmills: Palgrave/MacMillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalopoulos, C. (2020) Ending Global Poverty: Four Women’s Noble Conspiracy, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiavo-Campo, S. and H.W. Singer (1970) Perspectives of Economic Development, (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiavo-Campo, S. (2021) Email May 14, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, C. (2019) Email, 7 August 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L. (2016) “Weak Economy, Angry Politics”, Washington Post, October 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • TFAF (2016) “The Trade Facilitation Agreement Facility, 2015 Budget”, www.tfat.org.

  • UN (2009) Report of the Commission of Experts of the President of the UN General Assembly on the Reform of the International Monetary System, (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2014) “Mexico High Level Meeting Communique”, The Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation and the Post 2015-Development Agenda, 16 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2015a) “Third International Conference on Financing for Development”, A/RES/69/313, (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015b) The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015, (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2006) “Trade on Human Terms”, Asia and Pacific Human Development Report 2006, Overview, (Macmillan India for UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP and World Bank (2007), Joint Guidance Note on Integrated Recovery Planning Using Post Conflict Needs Assessments and Transitional Results Frameworks, (New York and Washington: UNDP and World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. and B. Whitty (2017) The Politics and Results Agenda in DFID, 1997–2017, ODI Report, (London: ODI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, R. (2011) “Did the Protectionist Dog Bark?” Policy Report, (Stockholm: ENTWINED).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005) Fragile States—Good Practice in Country Assistane Strategies, (Washington, DC: The World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2019) Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-Being for All, (Geneva: WHO).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (1995) The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, (Geneva: WTO).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2009) Report to the TPRB from the Director General on the Financial and Economic Crisis and Trade Related Developments, WT/TPR/OV/W/1, (Geneva: WTO).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2015) State Trading: China, G/STR/N/10-15/CHN, (Geneva: WTO).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2016) WTO Report on G-20 Trade Measures (mid-May 2016-to mid-October 2016), (Geneva: WTO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanguas, P. (2018) Why We Lie About Aid: Development and the Messy Politics of Aid, (London: ZED Books).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constantine Michalopoulos .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Michalopoulos, C. (2022). Liberalism in Retreat. In: Aid, Trade and Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96036-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96036-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96035-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96036-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics