Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Online Health Communities: The Impact of AI Conversational Agents on Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 437))

  • 2241 Accesses

Abstract

The literature lacks evidence on the acceptability of AI conversational agents (chatbots) and the motivations for their adoption in healthcare industry. This paper aims to examine the acceptance of these chatbots based on the UTAUT model in Online Health Communities (OHCs) and to explore what kind of impact these particular features have on the users’ intentions, and the actual use of these communities. Based on a quantitative methodology approach, we rely on the UTAUT model to study OHCs users’ behavior and intentions towards such AI conversational agents/chatbots. The study shows that the UTAUT has proved to be a strong and reliable model for evaluating the adoption and application of AI conversational agents (chatbots) in OHCs. A questionnaire was employed to collect data, and respondents are chosen using the cluster sampling approach. On a 7 Likert scale, respondents were asked to select which choice best suited their reaction to any of the topics presented. A total of 632 answers from 62 countries were received, with 443 of them being complete. Many tests were used to examine the data such as the bivariate and multivariate analysis. Since the returned p-value for most of the hypotheses tested was 0.05, the majority of the hypotheses tested were accepted. Findings showed the interrelations between AI conversational agents/chatbots and OHCs on users’ Behavioral Intention (BI). The main constructs of the UTAUT model (Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, and Facilitating Conditions) had a significant impact on the participants’ BI and Usage Behavior (UB) for AI conversational agents/chatbots in OHCs. As for moderators, gender and age had no effect on BI and UB. Understanding the main factors that have a significant impact on users’ intentions to use chatbots in OHCs determines the significance of those results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wright, R.: The coronavirus pandemic is now a threat to national security, The New Yorker, 7 October (2020). https://www.newyorker.com/news

  2. Long, M.: Deep learning in healthcare- How it’s changing the game (2020). https://www.aidoc.com/blog/deep-learning-in-healthcare/

  3. Sennaar, K.: Chatbots for healthcare – comparing 5 current applications. business intelligence and analytics. Healthcare. Customer Service. Emerj, the AI Research and Advisory Company (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Gordon, B.D., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu, B.: Patient continued use of online health care communities: Web mining of patient-doctor communication. J. Med. Internet Res. 20, e126 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mesko, B., Gyorffy, Z.: The rise of the empowered physician in the digital health era: viewpoint. J. Med. Internet Res. 21(2), e12490 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Papadaki, M., Karamitsos, I., Themistocleous, M.: Covid-19 digital test certificates and blockchain. J. Enterp. Inf. Manage. 34, 993–1003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2021-554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jabarulla, M.Y., Lee, H.-N.: A blockchain and artificial intelligence-based, patient-centric healthcare system for combating the COVID-19 pandemic: opportunities and applications. Healthcare 9, 1019 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9081019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karamitsos, I., Papadaki, M.: Blockchain digital test certificates for COVID-19. In: Tallón-Ballesteros, A.J. (Ed.) Modern Management based on Big Data II and Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems III (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koteluk, O., Wartecki, A., Mazurek, S., Kołodziejczak, I., Mackiewicz, A.: How do machines learn? artificial intelligence as a New Era in medicine. J. Personalized Med. 11(1), 32 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11010032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abd-Alrazaq, A.A., Bewick, B., Farragher, T., Gardner, P.: Factors that affect the use of electronic personal health records among patients: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 126, 164–175 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Palanica, A., Flaschner, P., Thommandram, A., Li, M., Fossat, Y.: Physicians’ perceptions of chatbots in health care: cross-sectional web-based survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 21(4), e12887 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2196/12887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Amato, F., Marrone, S., Moscato, V., Piantadosi, G., Picariello, A., Sansone, C.: CEUR workshop proceedings. Chatbots Meet eHealth: Automatizing Healthcare (2017). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1982/paper6.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2019

  14. Brandtzaeg, P.B., Følstad, A.: Why people use chatbots. In: Kompatsiaris, I., et al. (eds.) INSCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10673, pp. 377–392. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Park, S.H., Lee, L., Yi, M.Y.: Group-level effects of facilitating conditions on individual acceptance of information systems. Inf. Technol. Manage. 12(4), 315–334 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, Z., Lu, Y., Kou, Y., Wu, D.T.Y., Huh-Yoo, J., He, Z.: Stud Health Technol Inform. 264, 1403–1407 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abd-Alrazaq, A.A. Alajlani, M., Denecke, K., Nashva, A., Denecke, K. Bewick, B.: Perceptions and opinions of patients about mental health chatbots: scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khalilzadeh, J., Ozturk, A.B., Bilgihan, A.: Security-related factors in extended UTAUT model for NFC based mobile payment in the restaurant industry. Comput. Hum. Behav. 70, 460–474 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Šumak, B., Šorgo, A.: The acceptance and use of interactive whiteboards among teachers: differences in UTAUT determinants between pre- and post-adopters. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64, 602–620 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoque, R., Sorwar, G.: Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: an extension of the UTAUT model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 101, 75–84 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chauhan, S., Jaiswal, M.: Determinants of acceptance of ERP software training in business schools: empirical investigation using UTAUT model. Int. J. Manage. Educ. 14, 248–262 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2016.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cimperman, M., Brenčič, M.M., Trkman, P.: Analyzing older users’ home telehealth services acceptance behavior—applying an extended UTAUT model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 90, 22–31 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor, S., Todd, P.: Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Q. 19(4), 561–570 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., Larsen, K.R.T.: The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12, 752–780 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Esmaeilzadeh, P., Sambasivan, M., Kumar, N., Nezakati, H.: Adoption of clinical decision support systems in a developing country: antecedents and outcomes of physician’s threat to perceived professional autonomy. Int. J. Med. Inf. 84(8), 548–560 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. De Veer, A.J.E., Peeters, J.M., Brabers, A.E., Schellevis, F.G., Rademakers, J.J., Francke, A.L.: Determinants of the intention to use e-Health by community dwelling older people. BMC Health Serv. Res. 15, 103 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chan, F.K.Y., Thong, J.Y.L., Venkatesh, W., Brown, S.A., Hu, P.J., Tam, K.Y.: Modeling citizen satisfaction with mandatory adoption of an E-government technology. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 11(10), 519–549 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Guo, Y.: Moderating effects of gender in the acceptance of mobile based on UTAUT model. Int. J. Smart Home 9(1), 203–216 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23(1), 67–93 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Straub, D.W., Boudreau, M.-C., Gefen, D.: Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Comm. AIS 13, 380–427 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Creswell, J.W.: Research Design: Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, Second edition Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Orlikowski, W.J., Baroudi, J.J.: Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(1), 1–28 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Walsh, I.: Using quantitative data in mixed-design grounded theory studies: an enhanced path to formal grounded theory in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2014, 1–27 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tavares, J., Oliveira, T.: Electronic health record portal adoption: a cross country analysis. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 17, 97 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0482-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Okumus, F., Ali, F., Bilgihan, A., Ozturk, A.B.: Psychological factors influencing customers’ acceptance of smartphone diet apps when ordering food at restaurants. Int. J. Hospital. Manage. 72, 67–77 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Reyes-Mercado, P.: Adoption of fitness wearables. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 20(1), 103–127 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pai, F.-Y., Huang, K.-I.: applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change. 78, 650–660 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Quaosar, G.A.A., Hoque, M.R., Bao, Y.: Investigating factors affecting Elderly’s intention to use m-health services: an empirical study. Telemed. E Health 24(4), 309–314 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gao, Y., Li, H., Luo, Y.: An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 115(9), 1704–1723 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hsieh, P.J.: An empirical investigation of patients’ acceptance and resistance toward the health cloud: the dual factor perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 959–969 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lu, X., Zhang, R., Zhu, X.: An empirical study on patients’ acceptance of physician-patient interaction in online health communities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 5084 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Alain Osta

  2. School of Business, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Angelika Kokkinaki & Charbel Chedrawi

  3. Business and Management Faculty, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon

    Charbel Chedrawi

Authors
  1. Alain Osta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angelika Kokkinaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charbel Chedrawi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Osta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Marinos Themistocleous

  2. British University in Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Maria Papadaki

Appendixes

Appendixes

1.1 Appendix A: Demographic Characteristics of the Study Population

figure a

1.2 Appendix B: Experience Related to the Use of Chatbots in OHCs

figure b

1.3 Appendix C: Descriptive Analysis of UTAUT Main Constructs

figure c

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Osta, A., Kokkinaki, A., Chedrawi, C. (2022). Online Health Communities: The Impact of AI Conversational Agents on Users. In: Themistocleous, M., Papadaki, M. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 437. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95947-0_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95947-0_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-95946-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-95947-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation