Skip to main content

Evidence-Based Trauma Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Textbook of Polytrauma Management

Abstract

Evidence-based trauma care requires the provider to combine the best evidence with patient values and provider preferences to make treatment decisions. The practice of evidence-based trauma care requires the formulation of question, acquisition of related literature, appraisal of study quality, and the appropriate application of research findings to individual patients. Evidence-based trauma care may not be able to strictly depend on the results of randomized controlled trials. Practically, evidence-based management should involve the informed and effective use of all types of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guyatt GH. Evidence-based medicine [editorial]. ACP Club A–16. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhandari M, Giannoudis PV. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it is not. Injury. 2006;37(4):302–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Devereaux PJ, McKee MD, Yusuf S. Methodologic issues in randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1976-2007). 2003;413:25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF. Introducing a new journal section: evidence-based orthopaedics. JBJS. 2000;82(6):759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nåsell H, Adami J, Samnegård E, Tønnesen H, Ponzer S. Effect of smoking cessation intervention on results of acute fracture surgery: a randomized controlled trial. JBJS. 2010;92(6):1335–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Willits K, Amendola A, Bryant D, Mohtadi NG, Giffin JR, Fowler P, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation. JBJS. 2010;92(17):2767–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Canadian OTS. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lyles KW, Colon-Emeric CS, Magaziner JS. Zoledronic acid in reducing clinical fracture and mortality after hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 2007;357

    Google Scholar 

  10. Study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures I. Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(12):2567.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A, Cadotte DW, Harrop JS, et al. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PloS one. 2012;7(2):e32037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rangan A, Handoll H, Brealey S, Jefferson L, Keding A, Martin BC, et al. Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(10):1037–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buckley R, Tough S, McCormack R, Pate G, Leighton R, Petrie D, et al. Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(10):1733–44. Epub 2002/10/16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Flow I. A trial of wound irrigation in the initial management of open fracture wounds. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(27):2629–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. How to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH, Browman G, Cook D, Gerstein H, et al. Users’ guides to the medical literature: I. How to get started. JAMA. 1993;270(17):2093–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Group GW. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD. Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. LWW. 2003;85:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang LJS, Chang KWC, Chung KC. Methodology rigor in clinical research. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(6):979e.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Force USPST, United States. Office of Disease P, Health P. Guide to clinical preventive services: report of the US Preventive Services Task Force: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Public Health and …; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1989;95(2):2S–4S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2016;21(4):125–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hariton E, Locascio JJ. Randomised controlled trials—the gold standard for effectiveness research. BJOG. 2018;125(13):1716.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Brighton B, Bhandari M, Tornetta P, Felson DT. Hierarchy of evidence: from case reports to randomized controlled trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;413:19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lefaivre KA, Slobogean GP. Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses in orthopaedics. JAAOS. 2013;21(4):245–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Egger M, Davey-Smith G, Altman D. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. John Wiley & Sons; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Westphal T, Piatek S, Schubert S, Schuschke T, Winckler S. Reliability and validity of the upper limb DASH questionnaire in patients with distal radius fractures. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete. 2002;140(4):447–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clin Trials. 1989;10(4):407–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnston BC, Thorlund K, Schünemann HJ, Xie F, Murad MH, Montori VM, et al. Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Franchignoni F, Vercelli S, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Bravini E, Ferriero G. Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J Orthop& Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(1):30–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chaudhry H, Kleinlugtenbelt YV, Mundi R, Ristevski B, Goslings JC, Bhandari M. Are volar locking plates superior to percutaneous K-wires for distal radius fractures? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(9):3017–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zong S-L, Kan S-L, Su L-X, Wang B. Meta-analysis for dorsally displaced distal radius fracture fixation: volar locking plate versus percutaneous Kirschner wires. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10(1):108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Engels EA, Schmid CH, Terrin N, Olkin I, Lau J. Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses. Statist Med. 2000;19(13):1707–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sinclair JC, Bracken MB. Clinically useful measures of effect in binary analyses of randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(8):881–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Walsh M, Srinathan SK, McAuley DF, Mrkobrada M, Levine O, Ribic C, et al. The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(6):622–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Evaniew N, Files C, Smith C, Bhandari M, Ghert M, Walsh M, et al. The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in spine surgery: a systematic survey. Spine J. 2015;15(10):2188–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Khan M, Evaniew N, Gichuru M, Habib A, Ayeni OR, Bedi A, et al. The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in sports surgery: a systematic survey. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(9):2164–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yusuf S, Wittes J, Probstfield J, Tyroler HA. Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 1991;266(1):93–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Henry D, Hill S, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4(1):38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Axelrod .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Axelrod, D., Comeau-Gauthier, M., Woolnaugh, T., Johal, H., Bhandari, M. (2022). Evidence-Based Trauma Care. In: Pape, HC., Borrelli Jr., J., Moore, E.E., Pfeifer, R., Stahel, P.F. (eds) Textbook of Polytrauma Management . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95906-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95906-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-95905-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-95906-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics