Skip to main content

Beyond the Semi-classical View of Atoms and Molecules in Crystals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantum Crystallography: Expectations vs Reality

Abstract

In this chapter, the models for the electron charge and spin density derived from X-ray and polarized neutron diffraction experiments are presented. The pitfalls of the spherical atom model are depicted and the advantage of more sophisticated models like the multipolar atom model are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a given electronic configuration of an atom, there are different possible distributions of the electrons in the atomic orbitals, which implies several possible total angular (orbital) and spin momentums. For each pair of orbital and spin momentums, we obtain a state and the one with lowest energy is the ground state. However, each state may be produced by several microstates, depending on the exact distribution of electrons in each orbital type. A calculation normally refers to one such microstates and therefore may return a non-spherical electron distribution around an atom, whereas an average among microstates necessarily returns a spherical electron density.

  2. 2.

    Noteworthy, sometime the quantity \(\mathbf{H}\) is used to indicate the vector in the reciprocal space which satisfies diffraction conditions, where \(\left|\mathbf{H}\right|=1/{d}_{\mathbf{H}}=\left|{\mathbf{k}}_{\mathrm{diffracted}}-{\mathbf{k}}_{\mathrm{incident}}\right|/2 \pi =2sin\vartheta / \lambda\), while \(\mathbf{k} \,or\, \mathbf{S}\, ({\text{with}} \,\mathbf{k}=2\mathrm{\pi }\mathbf{S}\)) are used to address a generic point in the reciprocal space. Therefore, the coordinates of \(\mathbf{H}\) in the reciprocal space are integer numbers h, k, l, those emerging from the Laue conditions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piero Macchi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Macchi, P. (2022). Beyond the Semi-classical View of Atoms and Molecules in Crystals. In: Quantum Crystallography: Expectations vs Reality. SpringerBriefs in Crystallography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95641-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics