Skip to main content

On Principal Component Analysis of the Convex Combination of Two Data Matrices and Its Application to Acoustic Metamaterial Filters

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data Science (LOD 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 13163))

Abstract

In this short paper, a matrix perturbation bound on the eigenvalues found by principal component analysis is investigated, for the case in which the data matrix on which principal component analysis is performed is a convex combination of two data matrices. The application of the theoretical analysis to multi-objective optimization problems (e.g., those arising in the design of acoustic metamaterial filters) is briefly discussed, together with possible extensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is common practice to apply PCA to centered (also called de-meaned) data matrices \(\mathbf {X}^{(c)}\), i.e., having the form \(\mathbf {X}^{(c)} \doteq \mathbf {X}-\mathbf {1}_m \bar{\mathbf {x}}'\), where \(\mathbf {1}_m \in \mathbf {R}^m\) denotes a column vector made of m ones, and \(\bar{\mathbf {x}}\in \mathbf {R}^n\) is a column vector whose elements are the averages of the corresponding columns of \(\mathbf {X}\). This does not change the quality of the results of the theoretical analysis, because, by linearity, the centered convex combination of two data matrices \(\mathbf {X}_1\) and \(\mathbf {X}_2\) is equal to the convex combination of the two respective centered data matrices \(\mathbf {X}_1^{(c)}\) and \(\mathbf {X}_2^{(c)}\).

  2. 2.

    These, loosely speaking, represent the smallest angles between corresponding elements of the orthonormal bases of two subspaces of \(\mathbb {R}^n\), being the bases chosen to minimize such angles. For rigorous definitions, see [11, 12] and the references therein.

  3. 3.

    Such optimization problems are typically characterized by a high computational effort needed for an exact evaluation of the gradient of their objective functions, which is motivated by the fact that each such evaluation requires solving the physical-mathematical model associated with the specific choice of the vector of parameters of the model, which is also the vector of optimization variables.

  4. 4.

    The reader is referred to [1] for examples of both single-objective and multi-objective optimal design problems for acoustic metamaterial filters (possible objective functions being the band gap and the band amplitude).

References

  1. Bacigalupo, A., Gnecco, G., Lepidi, M., Gambarotta, L.: Design of acoustic metamaterials through nonlinear programming. In: Pardalos, P.M., Conca, P., Giuffrida, G., Nicosia, G. (eds.) MOD 2016. LNCS, vol. 10122, pp. 170–181. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51469-7_14

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bacigalupo, A., Gnecco, G., Lepidi, M., Gambarotta, L.: Computational design of innovative mechanical metafilters via adaptive surrogate-based optimization. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 375, 113623 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collette, Y., Siarry, P.: Multiobjective Optimization: Principles and Case Studies, Springer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gnecco, G., Bacigalupo, A., Fantoni, F., Selvi, D.: Principal component analysis applied to gradient fields in band gap optimization problems for metamaterials. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Metamaterials and Nanophotonics (METANANO) (2021). J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2015. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2015/1/012047

  5. Gnecco, G., Sanguineti, M.: Accuracy of suboptimal solutions to kernel principal component analysis. Comput. Optim. Appl. 42, 265–287 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Horn, R.A., Johnson, C.R.: Topics in Matrix Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge(1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis, Springer, New York (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/b98835

  8. Kim, I.Y., de Weck, O.L.: Adaptive weighted-sum method for bi-objective optimization: pareto front generation. Struct. Multi. Optim. 29, 149–158 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart, G. W., Sun, J.-G.: Matrix Perturbation Theory, Academic Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vadalà, F., Bacigalupo, A., Lepidi, M., Gambarotta, L.: Free and forced wave propagation in beam lattice metamaterials with viscoelastic resonators. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 193, 106129 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wedin, P.Å.: Perturbation bounds in connection with singular value decomposition. BIT 12, 99–111 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu, P., Knyazev, A.V.: Angles between subspaces and their tangents. J. Numer. Math. 21, 325–340 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

A. Bacigalupo and G. Gnecco are members of INdAM. The authors acknowledge financial support from INdAM-GNAMPA (project Trade-off between Number of Examples and Precision in Variations of the Fixed-Effects Panel Data Model), from INdAM-GNFM, from the Università Italo Francese (projects GALILEO 2019 no. G19-48 and GALILEO 2021 no. G21\(\_\)89), from the Compagnia di San Paolo (project MINIERA no. I34I20000380007), and from the University of Trento (project UNMASKED 2020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Gnecco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gnecco, G., Bacigalupo, A. (2022). On Principal Component Analysis of the Convex Combination of Two Data Matrices and Its Application to Acoustic Metamaterial Filters. In: Nicosia, G., et al. Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data Science. LOD 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13163. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95467-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95467-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-95466-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-95467-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics