Skip to main content

Big Data Medicine

  • 152 Accesses


Every minute of the day, approximately 3 petabytes (in bytes, that would be a number with 15 zeros!) of internet data are generated. Considering the exposome, many of them can be declared as health-related data in a narrower or broader sense. Only computers provide a solution for the analysis of these gigantic amounts of data for the purpose of individual diagnoses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-95293-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)


  1. 1.

    Data Never Sleeps 7.0 (2019) DOMO,

  2. 2.

    Shortliffe E (1976) Computer-Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN, Elsevier, 264 p., eBook ISBN: 9780444601735.

  3. 3.

    Aitken M et al. (2017) The growing value of digital health: evidence and impact on human health and the healthcare system. IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science,

  4. 4.

  5. 5.

    Samuel AL (2000) Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J Res Dev 44:206–226

  6. 6.

    Lunden I (2020) Babylon Health is building an integrated, AI-based health app to serve a city of 300 K in England. Techcrunch,

  7. 7.

    Ricci M (2017) Sensely and Mayo Clinic take virtual nurse one step further. Pharmaphorum,

  8. 8.

    Benjamens S et al. (2020) The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database. Npj Digit Med 3:118,

  9. 9.

    Kang DY et al. (2020) Artificial intelligence algorithm to predict the need for critical care in prehospital emergency medical services. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 28:17

  10. 10.

    Liu X et al. (2019) A comparison of deep learning performance against healthcare professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digital Health 1:e271–97,

  11. 11.

    Ardila D et al. (2019) End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography. Nat Med 25:954–961,

  12. 12.

    McKinney SM et al. (2020) International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature 577:89–94,

  13. 13.

    Matek C et al. (2019) Human-level recognition of blast cells in acute myeloid leukaemia with convolutional neural networks. Nat Mach Intell 1:538–544,

  14. 14.

    Williams SA et al. (2019) Plasma protein patterns as comprehensive indicators of health. Nat Med 25:1851–1857,

  15. 15.

    Liu MC et al. (2020) Sensitive and specific multi-cancer detection and localization using methylation signatures in cell-free DNA. Annals of Oncology 31:745–759,

  16. 16.

    Ofman JJ (2020) GRAIL and the quest for earlier multi-cancer detection. Nature,

  17. 17.

    Brinker TJ et al. (2019) Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. Eur J of Cancer 113:47–54,

  18. 18.

    Liu Y et al. (2020) A deep learning system for differential diagnosis of skin diseases. Nat Med 26, 900–908,; Jain A et al. (2021) Development and Assessment of an Artificial Intelligence–Based Tool for Skin Condition Diagnosis by Primary Care Physicians and Nurse Practitioners in Teledermatology Practices. JAMA Netw Open 4:e217249,

  19. 19.

    Assmann G et al. (2002) Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the prospective cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) study. Circulation. 105:310–315,, Erratum (2002) Circulation 105:900, PMID: 11804985, PROCAM score calculator:

  20. 20.

    Weng SF et al. (2017) Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data? PLOS One, 12:e0174944,

  21. 21.

    Daniel MC et al. (2019) Automated segmentation of the corneal endothelium in a large set of ‘real-world’ specular microscopy images using the U-Net architecture. Sci Rep 9:4752,

  22. 22.

    De Fauw J et al. (2018) Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease. Nat Med 24:1342–1350,; Arcadu F et al. (2019) Deep learning algorithm predicts diabetic retinopathy progression in individual patients. Npj Digit Med. 2:92,

  23. 23.

    Liang H et al. (2019) Evaluation and accurate diagnoses of pediatric diseases using artificial intelligence. Nat Med 25:433–438,

  24. 24.

    Perez MV et al. (2019) Large-Scale Assessment of a Smartwatch to Identify Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 381:1909–1917,

  25. 25.

    Chugh SS et al. (2014) Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation 129:837–47; Gallagher C et al. (2019) Increasing trends in hospitalisations due to atrial fibrillation in Australia from 1993 to 2013. Heart 105:1358–1363,

  26. 26.

    Sanna T et al. (2014) Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 370:2478–86

  27. 27.

    Dorr M et al. (2019) The WATCH AF trial: smartwatches for detection of atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 5:199–208; Kotecha D et al. (2018) European Society of Cardiology smartphone and tablet applications for patients with atrial fibrillation and their healthcare providers. Europace 20:225–33

  28. 28.


  29. 29.

    Schoettker P et al. (2020) Blood pressure measurements with the OptiBP smartphone app validated against reference auscultatory measurements. Sci Rep 10:17827,

  30. 30.

    Sim I (2019) Mobile devices and health. N Engl J Med, 381:956–68, doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1913980

  31. 31.

    Hu L et al. (2019) An Observational Study of Deep Learning and Automated Evaluation of Cervical Images for Cancer Screening. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 111:923–932,

  32. 32.

    Singh H et al. (2014) The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations BMJ Quality & Safety 23:727–731; Saber Tehrani AS et al. (2013) 25-Year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986–2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank BMJ Quality & Safety 22:672–680.

  33. 33.

    Elliott RA et al. (2019) Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England. BMJ Quality & Safety 010206,

  34. 34.

  35. 35.

    McMahan HB et al. (2017) Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA. JMLR: W&CP 54,

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schmidt, H.H.H.W. (2022). Big Data Medicine. In: The end of medicine as we know it - and why your health has a future. Springer, Cham.

Download citation