Skip to main content

Challenge 2: Continuity

  • 56 Accesses

Abstract

Over the last few decades, several shifts have occurred in how health is thought of and how health care is delivered. First, what was once disjointed episodes of care delivery is being replaced by comprehensive and continuous care across settings and in the home. This contributes to blurring the lines between the individual activities involved in care delivery and the promotion and maintenance of population health. However, different players in the healthcare system have different financial incentives for care delivery and population health; these do not always align with new expectations of roles and responsibilities. Coupled with this is a greater understanding that individual health is more than just absence of disease. Often, individuals are neither “healthy” nor “sick”; instead, their level of health exists on a continuum where multiple factors are at play. Finally, there is a lack of continuity in health policy and reimbursement mechanisms as all sectors move toward value-based care and away from fee-for-service payments. Together, these aspects of continuity (or lack thereof) make it difficult to isolate the components of health and health care in order to evaluate and understand the value of each.

Keywords

  • Value-based care
  • Care continuum
  • Population health

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-95149-8_3
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-95149-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   83.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 3.1
Fig. 3.2
Fig. 3.3
Fig. 3.4
Fig. 3.5

References

  1. Solid CA (2020) Return on investment for healthcare quality improvement. Springer Nature, Cham

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Hibbard JH, Greene J (2013) What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff 32(2):207–214. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Hibbard JH, Greene J, Shi Y, Mittler J, Scanlon D (2015) Taking the long view: how well do patient activation scores predict outcomes four years later? Med Care Res Rev 72(3):324–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558715573871

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Solid, C.A. (2022). Challenge 2: Continuity. In: Practical Strategies to Assess Value in Health Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95149-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95149-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-95148-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-95149-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)