Abstract
With an interest in the dynamics of structure and decay, this experiment challenges prevalent logics of building preservation by developing a hybrid strategy between digital geometrical data and physical manipulation. It informs an intervention to an exemplary construction, with the intention of adding structural redundancy and thereby converging model and building. In this regard, the chapter discusses the results of several on-site workshops with partners from business and industry, conducted at and on a derelict brick barn in Brandenburg, Germany. It merges 3D scanning data with industry practices for foundation injections and an external tensile structure, exemplifying an extension of prevalent strategies on building and the built, of what is finished and what may be persistent. Overlaying the obtained point cloud with an ideal model construed upon evidence from observed detailing and constructional history, it approaches the multiplicity of forces that over time have acted upon the brickwork. A translation of this deviation, traditionally conceived of as material and structural failure on a path towards collapse, functions as a qualitative representation of global deflection and allows for quantitative assessments of prospective strategies for intervention.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ayres, Phil. 2010. Persistent Modelling. Lecture at the Digital Material Seminar, Oslo. https://vimeo.com/11615361. Accessed 14 September 2020.
———. 2012. Introduction. Persistent modelling – reconsidering relations. In Persistent Modelling. Extending the Role of Architectural Representation, ed. Phil Ayres, 1–10. London: Routledge.
Barrère, Christian. 2019. Cultural Heritage: Capital, Commons, and Heritages. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Heritage Theory and Practice, ed. Angela M. Labrador and Neil Asher Silberman, 139–154. Oxford: University Press.
Buzzi, Olivier, Stephen Fityus, Yasumasa Sasaki, and Scott Sloan. 2008. Structure and properties of expanding polyurethane foam in the contextof foundation remediation in expansive soil. Mechanics of Materials 40 (12): 1012–1021.
Carpo, Mario. 2009. Revolutions: Some New Technologies in Search of an Author. The Log 15: 49–54.
———. 2011. Digital Style. The Log 23: 41–52.
DeLanda, Manuel. 2004. Material Complexity. In Digital Tectonics, ed. Neil Leach, David Turnbull, and Chris Williams, 14–21. Chichester: Wiley.
Dolff-Bonekämper, Gabi. 2010. Gegenwartswerte: Für eine Erneuerung von Alois Riegls Denkmalwerttheorie. In DENKmalWERTE: Beiträge zur Theorie und Aktualität der Denkmalpflege, ed. Hans-Rudolf Meier and Ingrid Scheurmann, 27–40. Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag.
Gethmann, Daniel, and Susanne Hauser. 2009. Einleitung. In Kulturtechnik Entwerfen: Praktiken, Konzepte und Medien in Architektur und Design Science, ed. Daniel Gethmann and Susanne Hauser, 9–18. Bielefeld: transcript.
Hauser, Susanne. 2013. Verfahren des Überschreitens. In Wissenschaft Entwerfen, ed. Sabine Ammon and Eva-Maria Froschauer, 363–384. Munich: Fink.
Hughes, Francesca. 2014. The Architecture of Error: Matter, Measure, and the Misadventures of Precision. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Ibach, Merle, Michaela Büsse, Felix Gerloff, Viktor Bedö,Shintaro Miyazaki and Jamie Allen. 2019. Unmaking: Against General Applicability. In The Critical Makers Reader: (Un)learning Technology, ed. Loes Bogers and Letizia Chiappini, 47–60. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
Kohler, Niklaus, and Uta Hassler. 2002. The Building Stock as a Research Object. Building Research & Information 30 (4): 226–236.
Latour, Bruno, and Albena Yaneva. 2008. ‘Give Me a Gun and I Will Make All Buildings Move’. An ANT’s View of Architecture. In Explorations in Architecture: Teaching, Design, Research, ed. Reto Geiser, 80–89. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Latour, Bruno. 2011. Why Do Architects Read Latour? An Interview with Bruno Latour. Perspecta 44: 64–49.
Mareis, Claudia. 2016. Doing Research: Design Research in the Context of the “Practice Turn”. In Design as Research: Positions, Arguments, Perspectives, ed. Gesche Joost et al., 35–41. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Palz, Norbert. 2016. “Personal Media Practice: Collapsing the Manifold.” Unpublished manuscript, UdK Berlin.
Picon, Antoine. 2004. The Ghost of Architecture. Perspecta 35: 8–19.
Thomsen, Mette Ramsgaard, and Martin Tamke. 2015. Prototyping Practice: Merging Digital and Physical Enquiries. In Rethink! Prototyping: Transdisciplinary Concepts of Prototyping, ed. Christoph Gengnagel, Emilia Nagy, and Rainer Stark, 49–62. Berlin: Springer.
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg, Karin Krauthausen, and Omar Nasim. 2010. Papierpraktiken im Labor: Interview mit Hans-Jörg Rheinberger. In Notieren, Skizzieren: Schreiben und Zeichnen als Verfahren des Entwurfs, ed. Karin Krauthausen and Omar Nasim, 139–158. Zurich, Berlin: Diaphanes.
Riegl, Alois. 1995 [1903] Entwurf einer gesetzlichen Organisation der Denkmalpflege in Österreich: Wesen und Entstehung des modernen Denkmalkultus. Kunstwerk oder Denkmal? Alois Riegls Schriften zur Denkmalpflege, ed. Ernst Bacher, 49–120. Vienna: Böhlau.
Sheil, Bob. 2014. High Definition: Negotiating Zero Tolerance. Architectural Design 84 (1): 10–13.
Witt, Andrew. 2011. Design Hacking: The Machinery of Visual Combinatorics. The Log 23: 17–25.
Zardini, Mirko. 2017. Eight Million Stories. In When Is the Digital in Architecture? ed. Andrew Goodhouse, 9–22. Berlin: Sternberg.
Van Mele, Tom, James McInerney, Matthew DeJong, and Philippe Block. 2012. Physical and Computational Discrete Modeling of Masonry Vault Collapse. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, ed. Jerzy Jasieńko, 2552–2560. Wroclaw: DWE.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Department of Digital and Experimental Design, the Department of Design and Building Construction and the Department of History and Theory of Architecture at Berlin University of the Arts. Also all efforts of our collaborating partners from business and industry, namely the firms and all involved staff from Uretek, Plan 3D Berlin, NowLab at BigRep and Carl Stahl for their material and personnel support to the project are greatly appreciated. Working towards publication was in part made possible through the support of the Cluster of Excellence »Matters of Activity. Image Space Material« funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy – EXC 2025 – 390648296. Special gratitude goes to the facilitating owner of the historical brick barn, without whose support the project could not have been realized.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bauer, F., Skafte, L.S. (2022). Persistent Modeling of the Built A Collective Experiment Merging Structural Preservation and Digital Design Between Academia and Industry. In: Bruyns, G., Kousoulas, S. (eds) Design Commons. Design Research Foundations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95057-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95057-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-95056-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-95057-6
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)