Abstract
Local government revenue sufficiency has been a long studied problem. This chapter analyzes the revenue sources for the jurisdiction. It identifies a variety of sources—property taxes, sales taxes, grants, fees and charges, cash management returns, employee contributions and other sources. It discusses equity issues, incentives for revenues, and constraints on revenues. It discusses tax base issues, tax innovations such as tax increment financing and community facilities districts, and the importance of land use decisions. It examines the impact of revenues on expenditures and vice versa. The chapter demonstrates both the complexity of the revenue system and how dynamic capabilities have generated new revenue sources that have added to this complexity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There are many other small sources of revenues that will not be considered in this analysis.
- 2.
Note that not all the connections are illustrated in order to keep Fig. 3.2 intelligible.
- 3.
Large lot or even single-family zoning is a contribution to the affordable housing crises which many cities are experiencing.
- 4.
However, just because they do not raise much money does not mean that they should be ignored. It may be that this is an unexplored arena for local revenue.
- 5.
Mines, agriculture, residential, residential rental, railroad and airline flight property, non-commercial historic property (including foreign trade zone property and enterprise zone property), historic commercial and industrial property, residential rental historic property and possessory interest, and real property (Arizona Tax Research Association, 2016).
- 6.
See Youngman (2016) for a more detailed and straightforward analysis of the incidence discussion.
- 7.
In California, Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts have replaced TIFs (Horiuchi & Chapman, 2019).
- 8.
Called Mello-Roos Districts in California.
- 9.
- 10.
In some jurisdictions, it may be possible to issue debt to raise revenues. Aside from capital projects or activities that generate a secure cash flow, this is a very risky behavior.
Bibliography
Arizona Tax Research Association. (2016 edition). Arizona property taxes. Phoenix. Retrieved March 26, 2021, from http://www.arizonatax.org/publication/books/explanation-arizona-property-taxes-2016-edition
Bergstrom, T. C., & Goodman, R. P. (1973, June). Private demands for public goods. The American Economic Review, 63(3), 280–296.
Brien, S. (2018). Compensating changes to the property tax levy? An empirical test of the residual rule. Public Finance Review, 48(6), 949–973.
Brooks, L., Halberstam, Y., & Phillips, J. (2016, June). Evidence from municipal fiscal constraints. National Tax Journal, 69(2), 315–322.
Chapman, J. (2013). Local government spending and revenues. In J. R. Bartle, W. B. Hildreth, & J. Marlowe (Eds.), Management policies in local government finance (6th ed., pp. 15–39). Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
Chapman, J. I. (1988). Land use planning and the local budget: A model of their interrelationships. Public Administration Review, 48(4), 800–806.
Chapman, J. I. (2008). The fiscalization of land use: The increasing use of innovative revenue raising instruments to finance public infrastructure. Public Works Management and Policy, 12(4), 551–567. State and local fiscal sustainability: The challenges. Public Administration Review (Special Issue), S115–S131.
Chernick, H. (2017). Evaluating the effect of differences in revenue systems on the fiscal health of large U.S. cities (Working Paper WP17HC1). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Ellickson, R. C. (2020). Zoning and the cost of housing: Evidence from silicon valley, greater New Haven, and greater Austin, January 13, 2020. Available at SSRN. Retrieved June 2, 2021, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3472145 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3472145
Felix, A. R. (2008). The growth and volatility of state tax revenue sources in the tenth district. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 3rd Quarter, 63–88.
Hendrick, R. (2013). Nontax revenue. In J. R. Bartle, W. B. Hildreth, & J. Marlowe (Eds.), Management policies in local government finance (6th ed., pp. 219–250). International City/County Management Association.
Horiuchi, C., & Chapman, J. (2019). TIF in California: Birth, growth, death and re-birth(?) In C. L. Johnson & K. Kriz (Eds.), Tax increment financing and economic development: Uses, structures and impact (2nd ed., Chapter 9).
McCaffery, J. (Ed.). (1981). Special issue on the impact of resource scarcity on urban public finance. Public Administration Review, 41, 179–189.
Mikesell, J. L. (2013). Consumption and income taxes. In R. Bartle, W. B. Hildreth, & J. Marlowe (Eds.), Management policies in local government finance (6th ed., pp. 193–218). International City/County Management Association.
Mikesell, J. L. (2014). Fiscal administration (10th ed.) Wadsworth. Boston.
Mikesell, J. L. (2018, September/October). Often wrong, never uncertain: 40 years of state revenue forecasting. Public Administration Review, 78(5), 795–802.
Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1997). The impact of urban land taxation: The Pittsburgh experience. National Tax Journal, 50(1), 1–21.
Peng, J. (2013). Cash, investments, and pensions. In J. R. Bartle, W. B. Hildreth, & J. Marlowe (Eds.), Management policies in local government finance (6th ed., pp. 297–313). International City/County Management Association.
Randall, M., Gordon, T., Freene, S., & Erin, H. (2018). Follow the money: How to track federal funding to local governments. Urban Institute.
Ross, J. M. (2018, March). Fiscal zoning and fiscal externalities. National Tax Journal, 71(1), 45–74.
Smolka, M. (2012, June). A new look at value capture in Latin America. Land Lines. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/articles/new-look-value-capture-latin-america
Wang, J., & Gorina, E. (2018). Fiscal effects of municipal annexation: Evidence from a large national sample of urban municipalities. Growth and Change, 49, 1–24.
Youngman, J. (2016). A good tax. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chapman, J. (2022). The Revenue Module. In: The Local Budget as a Complex System. Palgrave Studies in Public Debt, Spending, and Revenue. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94903-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94903-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94902-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94903-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)