Abstract
As Dean of the School of Liberal Arts and Education and a political science professor, I learned the hard way that teaching about disasters is not the same as living through one. In IR, the study of pandemics and communicable diseases falls under neoliberal institutionalism because the prevention and management of global pandemics require the cooperation of states, through intergovernmental organizations like the World Health Organization, to overcome a collective goods problem. Students of IR learn that global health security is a collective good (common or shared interest for all humans). Yet with the Covid-19 pandemic, today’s students and future generations will learn that the lack of global governance produced a worldwide health crisis in 2020. This essay offers the perspective of an administrator at a small liberal arts institution to examine how colleges and universities can avoid the collective action problem at all levels of the organization to deliver education remotely. Relying on anecdotal evidence from faculty and student surveys, the discussion focuses on the lessons learned for effective delivery of remote teaching. The chapter draws parallels between global and university governance to show that states, like campus units, can collaborate to conquer an unforeseen challenge as a pandemic.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities. 2020. “Recommendations for a Fall Return to Independent Higher Education in California.” AICCU Higher Education Task Force, June 19.
Cohen, Z., J. Hansler, K. Atwood, V. Salama, and S. Murray. 2020. “Trump Administration Begins Formal Withdrawal from World Health Organization.” CNN, July 8. https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/07/politics/us-withdrawing-world-health-organization/index.html.
Foresman, B. 2020. “Here are the US Universities That Closed Due to Coronavirus.” EdScoop, March 12. https://edscoop.com/universities-closed-due-coronavirus-2020/.
Formentos, A. and G. Gokcek. 2019. “Invisible Foes and Micro-Enemies: Pathogens, Diseases, and Global Health Security.” In Understanding New Security Threats, eds. M. Gueldry, G. Gokcek, and L. Hebron, 106–117. London: Routledge.
Gueldry, M., G. Gokcek, and L. Hebron. 2019. “Yesterday’s Security Debates, Today’s Realities.” In Understanding New Security Threats, 106–117. London: Routledge.
Hosek, A. M., and A. Lauren. 2016. “Exploring Pedagogical and Emotional Response in Higher Education Classrooms During the Boston Marathon Bombing Crisis.” Qualitative Research Reports in Communication 17 (16): 68–76.
Joshi, R., Kong, J., Nykamp, H., and H. Fynewever. 2018. “Universities Shaken by Earthquakes: A Comparison of Faculty and Student Experiences in Nepal and New Zealand.” International Journal of Higher Education 7 (4): 176–186.
Lord, B. 2011. “Coping with Natural Disasters: Lessons Learnt by a Head of Department.” Accounting Education: An International Journal 20 (6): 589–592.
Marcy, M. B. 2021. “Moving from the Tactical to the Strategic.” Inside Higher Ed, January 5. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2021/01/05/colleges-shouldnt-mistake-forced-short-term-adjustments-pandemic-necessary-long.
Markel, H., Lipman, H. B., and J. Alexander Navarro. 2007. “Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented by US Cities During the 1918–1919 Influenza Pandemic.” JAMA 298 (6): 644–654. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/208354.
Tull, S., Dabner, N., and K. Ayebi-Arthur. 2017. “Social Media and E-Learning in Response to Seismic Events: Resilient Practices.” Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning 21 (1): 63–76.
Weintraub, K. 2021. “Biden Administration Renewed Support for the World Health Organization ‘Is Good News for America and the World’ Scientists Say.” USA Today, February 22. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/01/22/scientists-applaud-biden-decision-rejoin-world-health-organization/4243377001/.
Acknowledgements
I thank Dr. Leah Ozeroff, Director of Institutional Effectiveness at Dominican University of California for providing the results from the HEDS (Higher Education Data Sharing Consortium) survey that was administered to students at my university. I also thank Dr. Lonnie W. Olson, Director of Assessment at Texas State University for his constructive feedback. I express my gratitude to Dr. Jeffrey S. Lantis at the College of Wooster for the invitation to contribute to this important volume on pandemic pedagogy in political science, as well as Dr. Yasemin Akbaba at Gettysburg College for her insightful comments on a version of this chapter that was presented first as a paper at the annual International Studies Association virtual convention in April 2021.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gokcek, G. (2022). Theory vs. Practice: An Administrative Perspective on Teaching and Learning in a Pandemic. In: Lantis, J.S. (eds) Active Learning in Political Science for a Post-Pandemic World. Political Pedagogies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94713-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94713-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94712-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94713-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)
