Skip to main content

Neural Predictors’ Accuracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Deep Learning in Multi-step Prediction of Chaotic Dynamics

Abstract

We examine the performance of different predictors in the deterministic environment and test their robustness against noise. In particular, we mimic the classical case of measurement noise by adding a random Gaussian signal of different intensity to the deterministic output of some archetypal chaotic systems. Then, we examine the critical case of structural noise, represented by the slow variation of the growth rate parameter of the logistic map. In both cases, the presence of noise rapidly degrades all the performance indicators, but, interestingly, the best deterministic predictor, i.e., LSTM trained without teacher forcing, remains the best also in the stochastic and non-stationary environments. Finally, we examine solar irradiance and ozone concentration time series, and again the same predictor turns out to be the best and can also be reliably applied to similar datasets in the same domain (domain adaptation).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chattopadhyay, G., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2008). A probe into the chaotic nature of total ozone time series by correlation dimension method. Soft computing, 12.10, 1007–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, J. L., Islam, S., & Biswas, P. (1998). Nonlinear dynamics of hourly ozone concentrations: Nonparametric short term prediction. Atmospheric environment, 32.11, pp. 1839–1848.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dercole, F., Sangiorgio, M., & Schmirander, Y. (2020). An empirical assessment of the universality of ANNs to predict oscillatory time series. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53.2, 1255–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fortuna, L., Nunnari, G., & Nunnari, S. (2016). Nonlinear modeling of solar radiation and wind speed time series. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Glorot, X., Bordes, A., & Bengio, Y. (2011). Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification: A deep learning approach. In Proceedings of the 28 th International Conference on Machine Learning, Bellevue, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guariso, G., Nunnari, G., Sangiorgio, M. (2020). Multi-Step Solar irradiance forecasting and domain adaptation of deep neural networks. Energies, 13.15, 3987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haase, P., Schlink, U., & Richter, M. (2002). Non-parametric short-term prediction of ozone concentration in Berlin: Preconditions and justification. In Air Pollution Modelling and Simulation (pp. 527–536). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kennel, M. B., Brown, R., & Abarbanel, H. D. (1992). Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Physical Review, A, 45.6, 3403.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Manabe, Y., & Chakraborty, B. (2007). A novel approach for estimation of optimal embedding parameters of nonlinear time series by structural learning of neural network. Neurocomputing, 70.7-9, 1360–1371.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maus, A., & Sprott, J. C. (2011). Neural network method for determining embedding dimension of a time series. Communications in nonlinear science and numerical simulation, 16.8, 3294–3302.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer, P. G., Kantz, H., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Characterizing variability and predictability for air pollutants with stochastic models. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 31.3, 033148.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ouala, S., et al. (2020). Learning latent dynamics for partially observed chaotic systems. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30.10, 103121.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. J. Povinelli, et al., Statistical models of reconstructed phase spaces for signal classification. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54.6, 2178–2186.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sangiorgio, M. (2021). Deep learning in multi-step forecasting of chaotic dynamics. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sangiorgio, M., & Dercole, F. (2020). Robustness of LSTM neural networks for multi-step forecasting of chaotic time series. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 139, 110045.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sangiorgio, M., Dercole, F., & Guariso, G. (2021). Sensitivity of chaotic dynamics prediction to observation noise. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54.17, 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Takens, F. (1981). Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In Dynamical systems and turbulence, Warwick 1980, pp. 366–381. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yijie, W., Min, H. (2007). Prediction of multivariate chaotic time series based on optimized phase space reconstruction. In Proceedings of the Chinese Control Conference (pp. 169–173).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yosinski, J., et al. (2014). How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 27, 3320–3328.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Sangiorgio .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sangiorgio, M., Dercole, F., Guariso, G. (2021). Neural Predictors’ Accuracy. In: Deep Learning in Multi-step Prediction of Chaotic Dynamics. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94482-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics