Skip to main content
Book cover

Geopolitical Transformations in Higher Education pp 179–198Cite as

The Internationalisation of Further Education: Between Geoeconomics and Geopolitics

Part of the Educational Governance Research book series (EGTU,volume 17)

Abstract

The chapter intends to radicalise a research agenda that explores the link between the knowledge-intensive economy, education and geopolitics. With the increasing significance of this type of post-Fordist economy not only higher education but equally further education has increased in importance. In this contribution, I seek to explore the enabling conditions of corporate education, examining the extent to which companies are able to create their own home-made corporate education. My contribution is divided into three parts. Firstly, I will set the stage by outlining the increasing importance of MNCs as part of globalisation and the complex relationship between geopolitics and geoeconomics in this context. I will then move on to discuss an analytical framework that makes it possible to explore the degree of autonomy MNCs have to create their own education and training. Against this backdrop, I will, thirdly, summarise some important findings of the pilot study I conducted where I explored the degree of internationalisation of corporate education that ranges from initial vocational education to leadership training of the top management. In each case, I explore the enabling conditions of, as well as restrictions on, the companies’ attempt to harmonise their firm-based education throughout the entire corporation with its branches in different parts of the world. I will reflect on the geopolitical and geoeconomic implications in each case, with a view to developing a new research agenda.

Keywords

  • Higher education
  • Geopolitics
  • Geoeconomics
  • Multinational companies
  • Corporate education
  • Authority
  • For-profit education

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-94415-5_11
  • Chapter length: 20 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-94415-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Eurostat TRNG_LFSE_01: Participation rate in education and training (last 4 weeks) by sex and age https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/trng_lfse_01/default/table?lang=en

  2. 2.

    See Eurostat trng_aes_100, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/trng_aes_100/default/table?lang=en

  3. 3.

    See Eurostat (trng_aes_170) https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/trng_aes_170/default/table?lang=en

  4. 4.

    http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Continuing_Vocational_Training_Survey_(CVTS)_methodology [last accessed 24/04/2021].

  5. 5.

    CMEs include Germany, France, Japan, Sweden, Austria, and Switzerland.

  6. 6.

    Liberal Market Economies (LMEs) are the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Ireland.

  7. 7.

    A study by the American consultancy firm Brandon Hall Group speaks of a trickle-down strategy in expenditure on training Brandon Hall Group, 2016. “2016 Brandon Hall Group, Training Benchmarking Study.”

  8. 8.

    Examples are Motorola, Apple, Deloitte, Dupont, IBM, General Motors, AT&T, Dell, Ford, and Boeing in the USA. In Germany the airline company Lufthansa was the first to establish a CU, followed by Volkswagen, Daimler-Benz, Siemens, Deutsche Bank and the pharmaceutical company Bayer, to name but a few. Examples in France are AXA, Alcatel-Lucent, EDF Group France Telecom, Fnac, Mazars, Orange and PSA Peugeot Citroën. Companies in Spain with corporate universities are Gas Natural Fenosa, Grupo Santander, Indra, Ferrovial, Telefónica and Banco Bilbao.

  9. 9.

    https://www.mars-llc.ru/cis/en/careers/more-than-a-job/mars-university.aspx [last accessed 24/04/2021].

  10. 10.

    https://quotes.wsj.com/AAPL/company-people/executive-profile/35827600 [last accessed 24/04/2021].

  11. 11.

    https://cpduk.co.uk [last accessed 24/04/2021].

  12. 12.

    The service is carried out by a sub-unit, Corporate Learning Improvement Process (CLIP) http://www.efmd.org [last accessed 24/04/2021].

  13. 13.

    A comparison between 2007 and 2011 indicates a slight decline in the education provided by employers, while external provision increased in many European countries. See EuroStat: Distribution of non-formal education and training activities by provider[trng_aes_170].

  14. 14.

    There also are some country-related differences. The EU Adult Education Survey identifies a broad range from 71% outsourcing in the Czech Republic to 31% in Slovenia. The EU average is 46 per cent. See Eurostat: Percentage of the total hours in external CVT courses, by training provider and NACE Rev. 1.1 [trng_cvts3_67] http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=trng_hour03n&lang=en [last accessed 28/05/2021].

  15. 15.

    This information is provided by the company. See www.skillsoft.com/about/press_room/press_releases/June-14-17-Skillsoft.asp [last accessed 24/04/2021].

  16. 16.

    www.wilsonlearning.com [last accessed 24/04/2021].

  17. 17.

    About 10% of training, on average, is provided by this type of provider in the EU countries, according to the latest EuroStat data. See EuroStat: Distribution of non-formal education and training activities by provider Code: trng_aes_170. https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/pjTE42j35nuLTd0tCI8R0A [last accessed 24/04/2021].

  18. 18.

    Interview 11; see also www.mercer.com/about-mercer.html [last accessed 24/04/2021].

  19. 19.

    This tendency towards a « digital monopoly » has triggered a very important discussion, both in the US Congress and the European Parliament, about how to revise competition and antitrust policy, respectively Foroohar, Rana. 2021. “EU and US regulators scrutinise Big Tech and digital ‘monopoly’.” in Financial Times.

  20. 20.

    http://www.thewindowsclub.com/microsoft-learning-partner [last accessed 24/04/2021].

  21. 21.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanponciano/2019/05/15/worlds-largest-tech-companies-2019/ [last accessed 24/05/2021].

References

  • Agnew, J. (2020). Geoeconomics and the state. In S. Moisio, N. Koch, A. E. G. Jonas, C. Lizotte, & J. Luukkonen (Eds.), Handbook on the changing geographies of the state new spaces of geopolitics (pp. 161–172). Edward Elgar.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. (2004). Driving ambition. The Guardian, Tuesday 28 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991[1966]). Social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2013). Continuing vocational Training survey, research paper number 102. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blass, E. (2001). What’s in a name? A comparative study of the traditional public university and the corporate university. Human Resource Development International, 4(2), 153–172.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon Hall Group. (2016). Learning and development 2014: Highlights and future trends, 2016 Brandon Hall Group training benchmarking study. www.brandonhall.com/blogs/learning-and-development-2014-highlights-and-future-trends/

  • Burt, R. S. (2004). From structural holes: The social structure of competition. In F. Dobbin (Ed.), The new economic sociology: A reader (pp. 325–348). Princeton University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Calıskan, K., & Callon, M. (2009). Economization, part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38(3), 369–398.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • CBS, and KU. (2011). Employment practices of multinational companies. Result report. Copenhagen Business School (SMG), University of Copenhagen (FAOS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B. X. (2014). Simplifying the bull: How Picasso helps to teach apple’s style inside apple’s internal training program. The New York Times, August, 10, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., Faulkner, D., & Pitkethly, R. (2000). Foreign direct investment in the UK 1985-1994: The impact on domestic management practice. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 141–166.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2010). The Global Firm. The Problem of the Giant Firm in Democratic Capitalism. In D. Coen, W. Grant & G. Wilson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of business and government (pp. 148–172). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Densford, L. E. (1999). Motorola University. The next 20 years. Corporate University Review, 7(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterling, K. (2014). Extrastatecraft: The power of infrastructure space. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P., Edwards, T., Ferner, A., Marginson, P., & Tregaskis, O. (2007). Employment practices of MNCs in organisational context: A large-scale survey report of Main survey. De Monfort University, King’s College London, Warwick Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In A. P. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), The varieties of capitalism (pp. 145–183). Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2020). Shaping Europe’s digital future. European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2020). Digital sovereignty for Europe. EPRS ideas paper. Towards a more resilient EU, PE 651.992 – July 2020. European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferner, A., Almond, P., Clark, I., Colling, T., Edwards, T., Holden, L., & Muller-Camen, M. (2004). Dynamics of central control and subsidiary autonomy in the management of human resources: Case-study evidence from US MNCs in the UK. Organization Studies, 25, 363–391.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2001). The architecture of markets: An economic sociology of twenty-first-century capitalist societies. Princeton University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foroohar, R. (2021). EU and US regulators scrutinise Big Tech and digital ‘monopoly’. Financial Times, January 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, S. (2015). Shadow sovereigns: How global corporations are seizing power. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, G. (2016). The dark side of management. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, E. (2016). Education outside the public limelight: The ‘parallel universe’ of ICT certifiers. In A. Verger, C. Lubienski, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2016, the global education industry (pp. 228–247). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, E. (2018). Transnational private authority in the sphere of education. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 25(1), 217–232.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, E. (2019). The shadow sovereigns of global education policy: A critique of the World Society approach. Journal of Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, E., & Kjaer, P. F. (2018). The status of authority in the globalizing economy: Beyond the public/private distinction. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20(1), 3–11.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, E., & Komljenovic, J. (2020). The employability dispositif, or the re-articulation of the relationship between universities and their environment. Journal for Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A.-W. (2000). An empirical analysis and extension of the Bartlett and Ghoshal typology of multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1), 101–120.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hippach-Schneider, U., & Huismann, A. (2016). Vocational education and training in Europe –Germany. Cedefop ReferNet VET in Europe reports. CEDEFOP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B., & Sum, N.-L. (2007). Towards a cultural international political economy: poststructuralism and the Italian school. In M. de Goede, Houndsmill, et al. (Eds.), International political economy and poststructural politics (pp. 157–176). Palgrave Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, H., Lehrer, M., Mühlbacher, J., & Müller, B. (2013). On the different ‘worlds’ of intra-organizational knowledge management: Understanding idiosyncratic variation in MNC cross-site knowledge-sharing practices. International Business Review, 22, 326–338.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, S., Galán-Muros, V., & Weko, T. (2020). The emergence of alternative credentials. OECD education working paper no. 216, EDU/WKP (2020). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. S. (2013[1977]). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttwak, E. N. (1990). From geopolitics to geoeconomics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest, 20(Summer), 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabey, C., & Ramirez, M. (2004). Developing managers: A European perspective. In C. Brewster & W. Mayrhofer (Eds.), Handbook of research on comparative human resource management (pp. 185–210). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. (2009). World society. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, S. (2016). “LinkedIn Learning: Loading education 4.0?”: IMD. www.imd.org/research-knowledge/articles/linked-learning-loading-education-4.0/

  • Moisio, S. (2019). Re-thinking geoeconomics: Towards a political geography of economic geographies. Geography Compass, 13(10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., & Kristensen, P. H. (2007). The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations, 59(11), 1467–1490.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Morris-Suzuki, T. (1997). Capitalism in the computer age. In J. Davis, T. Hirsch, & M. Stack (Eds.), Cutting edge: Technology, information, capitalism and social revolution (pp. 57–71). Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch, R. (2012). Inclusion and exclusion in the liberal competition state: The cult of the individual. Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2018). Multinational enterprises in the global economy: Heavily debated but hardly measured, May. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 295–336). JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio. Paul J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rademakers, M. F. (2014). Corporate universities: Drivers of the learning organisation. Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, F., Meyer, J. W., & Lerch, J. (2016). World society and the gobalization of educational policy. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), Handbook of global education policy (pp. 43–63). Wiley Blackwell.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2001). The global cities (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve have failed. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHRM. (2016). The new talent landscape: Recruiting difficulty and skills shortages. Society for Human Resource Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Training. (2019). 2019 Training industry report, November–December 2019. In Training. Excelsior: Lakewood Media Group, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2016). World investment report 2016. Investor nationality: Policy challenges. United Nation Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2020). Transnational corporations: Investment and development. UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vihma, A. (2018). Geoeconomic analysis and the limits of critical geopolitics: A new engagement with Edward Luttwak. Geopolitics, 23(1), 1–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, J. (2005). Would the real corporate university please stand up? Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(1), 7–20.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigell, M., Scholvin, S., & Aaltola, M. (Eds.). (2021). Geoeconomics and power politics in the 21st century. The revival of economic statecraft. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Eva Hartmann

Authors
  1. Eva Hartmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Hartmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Education, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Marcelo Parreira do Amaral

  2. Department of Education, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Christiane Thompson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hartmann, E. (2022). The Internationalisation of Further Education: Between Geoeconomics and Geopolitics. In: Parreira do Amaral, M., Thompson, C. (eds) Geopolitical Transformations in Higher Education. Educational Governance Research, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94415-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94415-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94414-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94415-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)