Feldman, M.S.: Routines as process. In: Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A., Tsoukas, H. (eds.) Organizational Routines. How They are Created, Maintained, and Changed, pp. 23–46. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016)
Google Scholar
Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C.: A process perspective on organizational routines. In: Langley, A., Tsoukas, H. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organization Process Studies, pp. 323–337. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2017). https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473957954.n20
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T., D'Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., Seidl, D.: What is routine dynamics? In: Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T., D'Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., Seidl, D. (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics, pp. 1–18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993340.002
Feldman, M.S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Jarzabkowski, P.: Routine dynamics in action: replication and transformation. Res. Sociol. Organ. 61, 1–10 (2019)
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Deken, F., Sele, K.: Innovation work and routine dynamics. In: Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T., D'Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., Seidl, D. (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics, pp. 288–300. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993340.025
Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Wurm, B., Grisold, T., Mendling, J., vom Brocke, J.: Business process management and routine dynamics. In: Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T., D'Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., Seidl, D. (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics, pp. 513–524. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993340.042
Pentland, B.T., Vaast, E., Ryan Wolf, J.: Theorizing process dynamics with directed graphs: a diachronic analysis of digital trace data. MIS Q. 45, 967–984 (2021). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15360
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Cornwell, B.: Social Sequence Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316212530
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Mahringer, C.A., Pentland, B.T.: Sequence analysis in routine dynamics. In: Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T., D'Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., Seidl, D. (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics, pp. 172–183. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993340.015
Dittrich, K.: Ethnography and routine dynamics. In: Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T., D'Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., Seidl, D. (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics, pp. 103–129. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993340.011
Locke, K., Feldman, M.S., Golden-Biddle, K.: Discovery, validation, and live coding. In: Elsbach, K.D., Kramer, R.M. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research, pp. 371–379. Routledge, New York (2015)
Google Scholar
Locke, K.: Field research practice in management and organization studies: reclaiming its tradition of discovery. Acad. Manag. Ann. 5, 613–652 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593319
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Mahringer, C.A., Dittrich, K., Renzl, B.E.: Interdependent routines and innovation processes – An ethnographic study of Scrum teams. In: Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management (2019). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.11891abstract
Mahringer, C.A.: Exploring routine ecologies – A characterization and integration of different perspectives on routines. University of Stuttgart, Dissertation, Stuttgart (2019)
Google Scholar
Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J.: The Scrum guide. The definite guide to Scrum: The rules of the game (2020)
Google Scholar
Feldman, M.S.: Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11, 611–629 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Dittrich, K., Guérard, S., Seidl, D.: Talking about routines: the role of reflective talk in routine change. Organ. Sci. 27, 678–697 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1024
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Sele, K., Grand, S.: Unpacking the dynamics of ecologies of routines: mediators and their generative effects in routine interactions. Organ. Sci. 27, 722–738 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1031
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Pentland, B.T., Feldman, M.S.: Narrative networks: patterns of technology and organization. Organ. Sci. 18, 781–795 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0283
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Danner-Schröder, A., Geiger, D.: Unravelling the motor of patterning work: toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organ. Sci. 27, 633–658 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1055
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Pentland, B.T., Kim, I.: Narrative networks in routine dynamics. In: Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., Seidl, D. (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics, pp. 184–195. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993340.016
Pentland, B.T., Recker, J., Wolf, J.R., Wyner, G.: Bringing context inside process research with digital trace data. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21, 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00635
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Pentland, B.T., Recker, J., Wyner, G.: Rediscovering handoffs. Acad. Manag. Discov. 3, 284–301 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2016.0018
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Goh, K., Pentland, B.T.: From actions to paths to patterning: toward a dynamic theory of patterning in routines. Acad. Manag. J. 62, 1901–1929 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0042
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Pentland, B.T., Mahringer, C.A., Dittrich, K., Feldman, M.S., Wolf, J.R.: Process multiplicity and process dynamics: weaving the space of possible paths. Organ. Theory 1, 1–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720963138
CrossRef
Google Scholar
van den Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Kummer, T.-F., Recker, J., Mendling, J.: Enhancing understandability of process models through cultural-dependent color adjustments. Decis. Support Syst. 87, 1–12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.04.004
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Grisold, T., Wurm, B., Mendling, J., Vom Brocke, J.: Using process mining to support theorizing about change in organizations. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2020)
Google Scholar
Hwang, S.-Y., Yang, W.-S.: On the discovery of process models from their instances. Decis. Support Syst. 34, 41–57 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00008-8
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Malinova, M., Mendling, J.: Cognitive diagram understanding and task performance in systems analysis and design. MIS Q. (In Press)
Google Scholar
Aalst, W.: Making work flow: on the application of petri nets to Business Process Management. In: Esparza, J., Lakos, C. (eds.) ICATPN 2002. LNCS, vol. 2360, pp. 1–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48068-4_1
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Yeshchenko, A., Di Ciccio, C., Mendling, J., Polyvyanyy, A.: Visual drift detection for sequence data analysis of business processes. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3050071
Melcher, J.: Process Measurement in Business Process Management: Theoretical Framework and Analysis of Several Aspects. KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe (2014). https://doi.org/10.5445/KSP/1000025397
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Burattin, A., Kaiser, M., Neurauter, M., Weber, B.: Eye tracking meets the process of process modeling: a visual analytic approach. In: Dumas, M., Fantinato, M. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 281, pp. 461–473. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58457-7_34
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Chapela-Campa, D., Mucientes, M., Lama, M.: Discovering infrequent behavioral patterns in process models. In: Carmona, J., Engels, G., Kumar, A. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10445, pp. 324–340. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65000-5_19
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Keegan, B.C., Lev, S., Arazy, O.: Analyzing organizational routines in online knowledge collaborations: a case for sequence analysis in CSCW. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 1065–1079. ACM (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819962
Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Mueller, N.S., Studer, M.: Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. J. Stat. Softw. 40, 1–37 (2011). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i04
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Gu, Z., Eils, R., Schlesner, M.: Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Pentland, B.T., Feldman, M.S., Becker, M.C., Liu, P.: Dynamics of organizational routines: a generative model. J. Manage. Stud. 49, 1484–1508 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01064.x
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Pentland, B.T., Hærem, T., Hillison, D.: Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organ. Stud. 31, 917–940 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610373200
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Howard-Grenville, J.: The persistence of flexible organizational routines: the role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16, 618–636 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0150
CrossRef
Google Scholar
D’Adderio, L.: The replication dilemma unravelled: how organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organ. Sci. 25, 1325–1350 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0913
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Boe-Lillegraven, S.: Transferring routines across multiple boundaries: a flexible approach. Res. Sociol. Organ. 61, 31–53 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000061003
CrossRef
Google Scholar
vom Brocke, J., Zelt, S., Schmiedel, T.: On the role of context in business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36, 486–495 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.10.002
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Mendling, J., Berente, N., Seidel, S., Grisold, T.: Pluralism and pragmatism in the information systems field: the case of research on business processes and organizational routines. Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst. 52, 127–140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3462766.3462773
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Mendling, J., Pentland, B.T., Recker, J.: Building a complementary agenda for business process management and digital innovation. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 29, 208–219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1755207
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Ariouat, H., Hanachi, C., Andonoff, E., Benaben, F.: A conceptual framework for social business process management. Procedia Comput. Sci. 112, 703–712 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.151
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Suša Vugec, D., Tomičić-Pupek, K., Vukšić, V.B.: Social business process management in practice: overcoming the limitations of the traditional business process management. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 10, 1–10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979017750927
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Geiger, D., Danner-Schröder, A., Kremser, W.: Getting ahead of time—Performing temporal boundaries to coordinate routines under temporal uncertainty. Adm. Sci. Q. 66, 220–264 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220941010
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Feldman, M.S.: Making process visible: alternatives to boxes and arrows. In: The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies, pp. 625–635. Sage, London (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473957954.n41