Skip to main content

Surgical Principles and Practices in Gynaecological Oncology: Achieving the Best Outcome

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gynecological Oncology
  • 571 Accesses

Abstract

Despite the recent advances in non-surgical anticancer treatment, surgical resection has remained the most important treatment modality in the management of majority of solid cancers. Whilst chemo- and radiotherapy have both been greatly standardised and protocol driven, surgery has remained highly dependent on human factors. It is imperative to prepare both the patient and the surgical team, and optimise the institutional circumstances well before the operation. Before surgery it is very important to make the correct decision, choose the correct patient, ensure the patient is properly counselled, consent is taken and the whole team including the lead surgeon, anaesthetist, assistants, srub nurses are well informed about the patient and the procedure. Intraoperative factors that affect surgical outcome range from theatre environment, noise levels, adequate infrastructure, surgeon skills, ensuring safe surgery with good clearance of margins. When surgery is to go ahead as planned then the key elements for most cancer operations are exploration, decision-making, resection and reconstruction. Post operative care is very important and includes the principles of enhanced recovery and holistic care to facilitate the patient’s recovery for timely adjuvant treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Daley J, Khuri SF, Henderson W, et al. Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:328–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schneider S, Armbrust R, Spies C, et al. Prehabilitation programs and ERAS protocols in gynecological oncology: a comprehensive review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301(2):315–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsimopoulou I, Pasquali S, Howard R, et al. Psychological prehabilitation before cancer surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4117–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carthey J, de Level MR, Wright DJ, et al. Behavioural markers of surgical excellence. Safety Sci. 2003;41(5):409–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sotto KT, Burian BK, Brindle ME. Impact of the WHO surgical safety checklist relative to its design and intended use: a systematic review and meta-meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2021;S1072-7515(21):02141–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McDonald J, Orlick T, Letts M. Mental readiness in surgeons and its links to performance excellence in surgery. J Pediat Orthop. 1995;15:691–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Suh IH, Chien JH, Mukherjee M, et al. The negative effect of distraction on performance of robot-assisted surgical skills in medical students and residents. Int J Med Robot. 2010;6:377–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wheelock A, Suliman A, Wharton R, et al. The impact of operating room distractions on stress, workload, and teamwork. Ann Surg. 2015;261(6):1079–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mentis HM, Chellali A, Manser K, et al. A systematic review of the effect of distraction on surgeon performance: directions for operating room policy and Surgical training. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(5):1713–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mcleod R, Myint-Wilks L, Davies SE, Elhassan HA. The impact of noise in the operating theatre: a review of the evidence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021;103:83–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(4):651–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janos Balega .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Balega, J., Barton, D. (2022). Surgical Principles and Practices in Gynaecological Oncology: Achieving the Best Outcome. In: Singh, K., Gupta, B. (eds) Gynecological Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94110-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94110-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94109-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94110-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics