Abstract
Gynaecological malignancy has an immense impact on the well-being of women. In order to help women clearly understand their disease, investigations, treatment options and prognosis, it is essential that we provide high-quality information in an appropriate manner and environment. Effective communication is key to a successful doctor–patient relationship and the delivery of safe patient care. Communication is defined as the act of imparting knowledge and encompasses the exchange of information, ideas and feelings. It is a two-way, relational process that is influenced by context, culture, words, and gestures, and it is one of the most important ways that clinicians influence the quality of medical care that patients and their families receive. When patients and doctors communicate well during cancer care, patients are more satisfied with their care, feel more in control and are more likely to follow through with treatment. This chapter covers flaws in communication, best practices for communication, informed consent, and breaking bad news.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ACT Academy. SBAR communication tool—situation, background, assessment, recommendation. NHS Improvement.
Back AL. Patient-clinician communication issues in palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:866–76.
Sardell AN, Trierweiler SJ. Disclosing the cancer diagnosis. Procedures that influence patient hopefulness. Cancer. 1993;1993(72):3355–65.
Zachariae R, Pedersen CG, Jensen AB, et al. Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:658–65.
Richards T. Chasms in communication. BMJ. 1990;301(6766):1407–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.301.6766.1407.
Duffy FD, Gordon GH, Whelan G, et al. Assessing competence in communication and interpersonal skills: the Kalamazoo II report. Acad Med. 2004;79(6):495–507.
Meryn S. Improving doctor-patient communication. Not an option, but a necessity. BMJ. 1998;316(7149):1922. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1922.
Rodriguez H, et al. Relation of patients’ experiences with individual physicians to malpractice risk. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008;20(1):5–12.
Zachariae R, Pedersen CG, Jensen AB, Ehrnrooth E, Rossen PB, von der Maase H. Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer. 2003;88(5):658–65.
Nguyen MH, Smets EMA, Bol N, et al. Fear and forget: how anxiety impacts information recall in newly diagnosed cancer patients visiting a fast-track clinic. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(2):182–8.
Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor–patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40:903–18.
National Voices. Person centred care 2020: calls and contributions from health and social care charities. September, 2014. https://www.nationalvoices.org.uk/publications/our-publications/person-centred-care-2020.
General Medical Council. Good medical practice. Manchester: GMC; 2013.
PDQ® Supportive and Palliative Care Editorial Board. PDQ Communication in Cancer Care. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Updated 02/01/2018. Available at: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/coping/adjusting-to-cancer/communication-hp-pdq.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist (RCOG). Standards for gynaecology: providing quality care for women. London: RCOG; 2016.
Buckman R. Communication in palliative care: a practical guide. In: Doyle D, Hanks GWC, MacDonald N, editors. Oxford textbook of palliative care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 141–56.
Baile WB, Glober GA, Lenzi R, Beale EA, Kudelka AP. Discussing disease progression and end-of-life decisions. Oncology. 1999;13:1021–31.
Boland B, Burnage J, Scott A. Protecting against harm: safeguarding adults in general medicine. Clin Med (Lond). 2014;14(4):345–8. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.14-4-345.
Sisk BA, Mack JW. How should we enhance the process and purpose of prognostic communication in oncology? AMA J Ethics. 2018;20(8):E757–65.
Kodjo C. Cultural competence in clinician communication. Pediatr Rev. 2009;30(2):57–64.
Scott R, Hawarden A, Russell B, Edmondson RJ. Decision-making in gynaecological oncology multidisciplinary team meetings: a cross-sectional, observational study of ovarian cancer cases. Oncol Res Treat. 2020;43(3):70–7.
Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L. Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(11):935–43.
Buckman R. Breaking bad news: why is it still so difficult? BMJ. 1984;288:1597–9.
Kaye P. Breaking bad news: a 10-step approach. Northampton: EPL; 1996.
Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. Assessing competence to consent to treatment: a guide for physicians and other health professionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Obtaining valid consent. Clinical Governance Advice No.6. London: RCOG; 2015.
British Medical Association. Confidentiality and disclosure of health information tool kit. London: BMA; 2009.
General Medical Council (GMC). Decision making and consent. 2020.
Cheung E, Goodyear G, Yoong W. Medicolegal update on consent: “The Montgomery Ruling”. Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;18(3):171–2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lakhiani, A., Sundar, S. (2022). Consent and Communication Skills in Management of Gynaeoncology. In: Singh, K., Gupta, B. (eds) Gynecological Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94110-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94110-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94109-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94110-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)