Abstract
Against the background of previous U.S. government approaches after the Cold War, this chapter focuses on domestic U.S. determinants of the remarkable shift in American policy toward China, along with the concurrent U.S. policy toward Russia. The argument employs Robert Putnam’s framework of “two-level games” to explain how the impact of domestic contestation and public opinion on elite-driven policy causes deviations from a standard realist approach to U.S.-China-Russia relations, and explains the development of a more unified and coherent U.S. approach toward China and Russia by the end of the Trump government’s first term. This chapter also highlights the endogeneity of the U.S.-China-Russia strategic triangle that is absent from most work on the subject. Not only does U.S. policy toward China and Russia affect bilateral China-Russia relations, but the causal arrow also runs in the other direction, with improvements in the China-Russia bilateral relationship affecting U.S. domestic politics and foreign policy incentives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biden, J. 2020. Why America Must Lead Again. Foreign Affairs, January 23. Available at https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-01-23/why-america-must-lead-again (Accessed 12 July 2021).
Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy. 2019. Episode 135: How Might a Democratic President Deal with China? China in the World Podcast Cast Transcript, June 25. Available at https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Episode_-_How_Might_a_Democratic_President_Deal_with_China_1.pdf (Accessed 12 July 2021).
Christopher, L. 1977. United States–Soviet Union–China: The Great Power Triangle. Summary of hearings conducted by the Subcommittee on Future Foreign Policy Research and Development of the Committee on International Relations, October–December 1975, March–June 1976. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Congressional Research Service. 2020a. Ukraine: Background, Conflict with Russia, and U.S. Policy. Report R45008, Washington, DC, April 29. Available at https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R45008.pdf (Accessed 15 February 2021).
Congressional Research Service. 2020b. US Sanctions on Russia. Report R45415, Washington, DC, January 17. Available at https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45415 (Accessed 15 February 2021).
Davis, W. 2019. Trump Call Himself ‘the Chosen One’ to Take on China. The Daily Caller, August 21. Available at https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/21/donald-trump-chosen-one-china-israel/ (Accessed 1 July 2021).
Department of Justice. 2020. Attorney General William Barr Delivers the Keynote Address to the Department of Justice’s China Initiative Conference. Department of Justice, News, February 6. Available at https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-william-p-barr-delivers-keynote-address-department-justices-china (Accessed 12 July 2021).
Devlin, K., L. Silver, and C. Huang. 2020. US Views of China Increasingly Negative Amid Coronavirus Outbreak. Pew Research Center, April 21. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/04/21/u-s-views-of-china-increasingly-negative-amid-coronavirus-outbreak/ (Accessed 1 July 2021).
The Economist. 2020. America Takes Aim at China. July 30. Available at https://www.economist.com/leaders/2020/07/30/us-china-relations-are-entering-a-dangerous-period (Accessed 12 July 2021).
Ellings, R., and R. Sutter, eds. 2019. Axis of Authoritarians: Implications of China-Russia Cooperation. Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research.
Fontaine, R. 2019. Great-Power Competition Is Washington’s Top Priority—But Not the Public’s. Foreign Affairs, September 9. Available at https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2019-09-09/great-power-competition-washingtons-top-priority-not-publics (Accessed 1 July 2021).
Friedberg, A. 2005. The Future of U.S.-China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable? International Security 30 (2) (Fall): 7–45.
Gallup. 2020. In Depth Topics A to Z, Russia. February. Available at https://news.gallup.com/poll/1642/russia.aspx (Accessed 15 February 2021).
Galtson, W. 2021. A Momentous Shift in US Public Attitudes Towards China. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, March 22. Available at https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2021/03/22/a-momentous-shift-in-us-public-attitudes-toward-china/ (Accessed 19 July 2021).
Glaser, B., and K. Flaherty. 2020a. US-China Relations Hit New Lows Amid Pandemic. Comparative Connections 22 (1) (May): 32–39.
Glaser, B., and K. Flaherty. 2020b. US-China Relations in Free-Fall. Comparative Connections 22 (2) (September): 25–32.
Glaser, B., and H. Price. 2021. Continuity Prevails in Biden’s First 100 Days. Comparative Connections 23 (1) (May): 29–37.
Global Times. 2020. Bizarre Bills Against China Stack Up in US Congress. June 18. Available at https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1191994.shtml (Accessed 1 July 2021).
Graham, T., and R. Legvold. 2021. It’s Better to Deal with China and Russia in Tandem. Politico, February 4. Available at https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/02/04/china-russia-tandem-policy-465616 (Accessed 15 February 2021).
Hass, R. 2019. Why Has China Become Such a Big Political Issue? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, November 15. Available at https://www.brookings.edu/policy2020/votervital/why-has-china-become-such-a-big-political-issue/ (Accessed 1 July 2021).
Kafura, C. 2019. Americans Favor US-China Trade, Split over Tariffs. The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, September 3. Available at https://www.thechicagocouncil.org/publication/lcc/americans-favor-us-china-trade-split-over-tariffs (Accessed 12 July 2021).
Kendall-Taylor, A., and D. Shullman. 2021. Navigating the Deepening Russia-China Partnership. Washington, DC: Center for New America Security, January 21.
Lampton, D. 2001. Same Bed: Different Dreams. Berkeley: University of California Press, 15–63.
Lo, B. 2008. Axis of Convenience. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lo, K. 2017. Donald Trump Tweets from Beijing About His ‘Unforgettable Afternoon’ with Xi Jinping. South China Morning Post, November 8. Available at https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2119016/trump-tweets-beijing-about-his-unforgettable-afternoon-xi-jinping (Accessed 15 December 2020).
Martin, J., and M. Habberman. 2020. GOP Aiming to Make China the Scapegoat. New York Times, April 19: A1.
Noone, H. 2019. The Two-Level Games and the Policy Process: Assessing Domestic-Foreign Linkage Theory. World Affairs 182 (2) (Summer): 165–186.
Phillips, M. 2020. Trump on China Trade Deal. Fox News, May 19. Available at https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-china-trade-deal-i-feel-differently (Accessed 1 July 2021).
Putman, R. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3) (Summer): 427–460.
Qi, R. 2020. Anti-China Stance at Munich Security Conference Criticized. China Daily, February 18. Available at https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202002/18/WS5e4b47b5a310128217278510.html (Accessed 12 July 2021).
Rauhala, E., T. Armus, and G. Shih. 2020. With Ultimatum, Trump Deepens Crisis with World Health Organization. Washington Post, May 20: A 29.
Rogin, J. 2020. Trump’s China Hawks Are on the Loose. Washington Post, June 26: A 23.
Saul, N. 2014. Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Foreign Policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sullivan, L., and R. Paarlberg. 2018. Historical Dictionary of Chinese Foreign Affairs. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sutter, R. 2011. Historical Dictionary of Chinese Foreign Policy. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Sutter, R. 2018a. US-China Relations: Perilous Past, Uncertain Present. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sutter, R. 2018b. China-Russia Relations: Strategic Implications and US Policy Options. Seattle, WA: National Bureau of Asian Research, September.
Sutter, R. 2018c. The 115th Congress Aligns with the Trump Administration in Targeting China. Pacific Forum CSIS Pacnet No. 62, August 30.
Sutter, R. 2020. Has US Government Angst over the China Danger Diminished? East-West Center Washington, Asia-Pacific Bulletin No. 497, January.
Sutter, R. 2021a. Chinese Foreign Relations: Power and Policy of an Emerging Global Force. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sutter, R. 2021b. Testimony Before the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, January 28. Available at https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2021-01/Robert_Sutter_Testimony.pdf (Accessed 6 February 2021).
Sutter, R., and S. Limaye. 2016. America’s 2016 Election Debate on Asia Policy and Asian Reactions. Honolulu: East-West Center, October.
Sutter, R., and S. Limaye. 2020. A Hardening US-China Competition: Asia Policy in America’s 2020 Elections and Regional Responses. Honolulu: East-West Center, October.
US-China Policy Foundation. 2021. US View of China Competition. Newsletter, May 21. Available at https://uscpf.org/v3/2021/05/21/us-china-competition/ (Accessed 10 June 2021).
U.S. National Intelligence Council. 2017. Global Trends: Paradox of Progress. Report NIC 2017-001, Washington, DC, January.
U.S. National Intelligence Estimate. 1969. The USSR and China. Number 11/13-69, August 12. Available at https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000261304.pdf (Accessed 19 July 2021).
U.S. National Intelligence Estimate. 2000. Russian-Chinese Relations: Prospects and Implications Update. NIE 2000–10C, September. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005526244.pdf (Accessed 19 July 2021).
Wright, T. 2020. The Quiet Reformation of Biden’s Foreign Policy. The Atlantic, March 19. Available at https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/foreign-policy-2021-democrats/608293/ (Accessed 19 July 2021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sutter, R. (2022). America’s Growing Agreement on Countering Russia-China Challenges. In: Yoder, B.K. (eds) The United States and Contemporary China-Russia Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93982-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93982-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93981-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93982-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)