Skip to main content

A Definitional Preamble

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Right to Health Care: Ethical Considerations

Part of the book series: The International Library of Bioethics ((ILB,volume 92))

  • 198 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces and defines the term that will be used in the rest of the study, and to indicate what role they play in the analysis of the right to health care. It also distinguishes between different approaches to analysing the right to health care and indicates why an ethical approach will be used in the subsequent analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Chap. 3, infra.

  2. 2.

    Where it is understood that the impossibility has not been brought about by the party whose duty it is to fulfil that right. See Chap. 2, pp. 23 f.

  3. 3.

    Justinian, Corpus Juris Civilis; Celsus, Digest of Roman Law 8: “Impossibilium nulla obligatio est” (There is no obligation to do anything that is impossible) [D.50.17.185]. See also Taylor v. Caldwell [1863] EWHC QB J1.

  4. 4.

    As will become important later when dealing with allocation of resources, impossibility is not the same as futility. Futility looks at whether the relevant action is likely to be successful in producing the intended or expected result. Thus, it would be futile to perform a colectomy on someone dying of inoperable metastasized cancer of the colon that has spread throughout the whole body and neither chemotherapy nor radiation have proved effective. It would be futile because it would not change the fact of impending death.

  5. 5.

    Hodgkinson (1996).

  6. 6.

    Sullivan (2003).

  7. 7.

    See Gough (1936), Riley (1982), Rousseau (1762).

  8. 8.

    Dworkin (1986), Finnis (1980), Fuller (1964).

  9. 9.

    Emon et al. (2015).

  10. 10.

    Cf. Rommen (1947).

  11. 11.

    Haakonssen (1996).

  12. 12.

    Encyclopedia Britannica, available at https://www.britannica.com/demystified/whats-the-difference-between-morality-and-ethics.

  13. 13.

    Oxford English Dictionary, available at https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ethics.

  14. 14.

    Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at http://www.iep.utm.edu/ethics/.

  15. 15.

    Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Ethics. http://www.iep.utm.edu/ethics/.

  16. 16.

    Williams (1985).

  17. 17.

    Aga Khan Health Services, https://www.akdn.org/our-agencies/aga-khan-health-services.

  18. 18.

    Eban, Abba. “Quotes;” retrieved 25/04/2021 at https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/abbaeban167934.html.

  19. 19.

    Althaus (1997).

  20. 20.

    World Health Organization (2017).

  21. 21.

    United Nations, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1, https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.

  22. 22.

    Environmental ethics and similar domains are not relevant to the present discussion because they are not involved in health care ethics insofar as it is the present enquiry is concerned.

  23. 23.

    Cf. Sherwin (1991).

  24. 24.

    Teichman (1985).

  25. 25.

    Cf. French (1979), Hess (2014), List and Pettit (2011).

  26. 26.

    See Chap. 7, infra.

  27. 27.

    For formal recognition of this at the government level, see Government of Canada, Research Involving the First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples of Canada; available at http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2/chapter9-chapitre9/. See Wilson (2001).

  28. 28.

    Cf. Firestone (1970).

  29. 29.

    Gilligan (1982).

  30. 30.

    Lindemann (2005).

  31. 31.

    Held (2006).

  32. 32.

    Tong (2006).

  33. 33.

    Baehr (2004), Hay (2013), Nussbaum (1999), Stone-Mediatore (2004).

  34. 34.

    Jaggar and Bordo (1992).

  35. 35.

    Dillon (2020).

  36. 36.

    Chappell (2014).

  37. 37.

    Zagzebski (2010).

  38. 38.

    Badhwar (2014).

  39. 39.

    Slote (2001).

  40. 40.

    Dawson (2009), Drane (1995), Pellegrino (1993), Toon (2014).

  41. 41.

    Bentham (2009), Mill (1998).

  42. 42.

    Sidgwick (1981), Parfit (1986), Singer (2011).

  43. 43.

    Moore (1912).

  44. 44.

    Brandt (1979).

  45. 45.

    Audi (2004).

  46. 46.

    Hare (1981).

  47. 47.

    Sinhababu (2018).

  48. 48.

    Eggleston (2014).

  49. 49.

    Rawls (1971).

  50. 50.

    Mandal et al. (2016).

  51. 51.

    Sassi (2006).

  52. 52.

    La Puma and Lawlor (1990), Prieto and Sacristán (2003).

  53. 53.

    Andrews (2002), Hilbert and Ackermann (1928).

  54. 54.

    Moreover, it would make a difference in the relative strength of their rights only if—and to the degree that—the difference in such factors affects the possibility of fulfilling the competing rights in question. For more on this, see infra. Chaps. 4 and 5.

  55. 55.

    Kant (1993 [1785]). Kant gave several other formulations of his categorical imperative—three more, to be exact—and he claimed that they were all equivalent. Cf. Paton (1947).

  56. 56.

    See supra, p. 9.

  57. 57.

    World Health Organization, Constitution (1948).

  58. 58.

    World Health Organisation (1992).

  59. 59.

    Boors (1977).

  60. 60.

    Whitbeck (1981).

  61. 61.

    Nordenfelt (1995).

  62. 62.

    Stokes et al. (1982).

  63. 63.

    Engelhardt (1975).

  64. 64.

    Weatherall (2018).

  65. 65.

    Kramer (2002).

  66. 66.

    Nordenfelt, op cit.

  67. 67.

    Ginsberg et al. (2002).

References

  • Althaus, F.A. 1997. Female circumcision: rite of passage or violation of rights? International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 23: 3, 130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Peter B. 2002. An Introduction to Mathematical Logic and Type Theory: To Truth Through Proof, 2nd ed. Berlin: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. 2004. The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Principia Ethica: Princeton University Press; Moore GE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badhwar, N.K. 2014. Well-Being: Happiness in a Worthwhile Life. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, A., ed. 2004. Varieties of Feminist Liberalism. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. 2009. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Dover Philosophical Classics. Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boors, C. 1977. Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science 44 (4): 542–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R.B. 1979. A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, T. 2014. Knowing What to Do. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, D. 2009. Conflicting stories of virtue in UK healthcare: Bringing together organisational studies and ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review18 (2): 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, R.S. 2020. Feminist Approaches to Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drane, J.F. 1995. Becoming a Good Doctor: The Place of Virtues and Character in Medical Ethics. Kansas: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronald M. Dworkin. 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, B. 2014. Act utilitarianism. In The Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism, ed. by Ben Eggleston and Dale E. Miller, 125–145. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emon, A.M, Levering, M., Novak D. 2015. Natural Law: A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, Jr. HT. 1975. The concepts of health and disease. In Evaluation and Explanation in the Biological Sciences ed. Engelhardt and Spicker, 125–141. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, John. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, S. 1970. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case For Feminist Revolution. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, P.A. 1979. The corporation as a moral person. American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3): 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, G., D. Hattis, B. Sonawane, A. Russ, P. Banati, M. Kozlak, S. Smolenski, and R. Goble. 2002. Evaluation of child/adult pharmacokinetic differences from a database derived from the therapeutic drug literature. Toxicological Sciences 66 (2): 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, J.W. 1936. The Social Contract. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haakonssen, K. 1996. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M. 1981. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press; Singer, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. 2013. Kantianism, Liberalism, and Feminism: Resisting Oppression. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global, 2nd ed. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, K.M. 2014. The free will of corporations (and other collectives). Philosophical Studies 168 (1): 241–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D., and W. Ackermann. 1928. Grundzüge der theoretischen Logik (Principles of Mathematical Logic). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, C. 1996. Administrative Philosophy: Values and Motivations in Administrative Life. Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A.M., and S.R. Bordo (eds). 1992. Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing. Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1993 [1785]. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. and ed. Ellington, James W., 3rd ed. Hackett. p. 30. Kant gave several other formulations of his categorical imperative—three more, to be exact—and he claimed that they were all equivalent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R.M. 2002. When paranoia makes sense. Harvard Business Review 8:7, 62-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Puma, J., and E.F. Lawlor. 1990. Quality-adjusted life-years. Ethical implications for physicians and policymakers. Journal of the American Medical Association 263 (21): 2917–2921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, H. 2005. An Invitation to Feminist Ethics. McGraw-Hill, passim.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, C., and P. Pettit. 2011. Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lon, L. 1964. Fuller, The Morality of Law. Revised Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, J., D.K. Ponnambath, and S.C. Parija. 2016. Utilitarian and deontological ethics in medicine. Trop Parasitol 6 (1): 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.E. 1912. Ethics. Williams and Norgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. 1998. Crisp, Roger (ed.). Utilitarianism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt, L.Y. 1995. On the nature of Health: An Action-Theoretic Approach. Intoduction: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. 1999. Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford U Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. 1986. Reasons and Persons. Oxford Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, A.J. 1947. The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E.T.D. 1993. The Virtues in Clinical Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toon, P. 2014. A Flourishing Practice? London: Royal College of General Practitioners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, L., and J.A. Sacristán. 2003. Problems and solutions in calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). BMC: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1: 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, P. 1982. Will and Political Legitimacy: A Critical Exposition of Social Contract Theory in Hobbes. Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Hegel, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommen, H.A. 1947 [reprinted 1959]). The Natural Law: A Study in Legal and Social Philosophy, trans. Thomas R. Hanley, Herder Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. 1762. The Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassi, F. 2006. Calculating QALYs, comparing QALY and DALY calculations. Health Policy and Planning. 21 (5): 402–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin, S. 1991. Abortion through a feminist lense. Dialogue 30:3, 327–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H. 1981. Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. Hackett Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. 2011. Practical Ethics, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinhababu, N. 2018. Scalar consequentialism the right way. Philosophical Studies 175: 3131–3144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slote. 2001. Morals from Motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, J., J. Noren, and S. Shindell. 1982. Definition of terms and concepts applicable to clinical preventive medicine. Journal of Community Health 8 (1): 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone-Mediatore, S. 2004. Women's rights and cultural differences. Studies in Practical Philosophy 4 (2): 111–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, R. 2003. Statutory Interpretation in a New Nutshell. Canadian Bar Review 82 (1): 51–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichman, J. 1985. The definition of person. Philosophy 6 (232): 75–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, M. 2006. New Perspectives in Healthcare Ethics: An Interdisciplinary and Crosscultural Approach. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherall, D.J. 2018. The evolving spectrum of the epidemiology of thalassemia. Hematology/oncology Clinics of North America 32 (2): 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitbeck, C. 1981. A theory of health. In Concepts of Health and Disease, ed. Caplan, A.L., Engenhardt, H.T. Jr., McCatrney J.J, 611–626 at. 620. Adison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, 1. Harvard University Pressp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carla, Wilson. 2001. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 17 (December 2001), 214–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation. 1992. Basic Documents, 39th ed. Geneva: WHO. https://apps.who.int/gb/bd/. Accessed 18 May 2020.

  • World Health Organization, Constitution. 1948. https://www.who.int/about/who-we-are/constitution. Accessed 18 May 2020.

  • World Health Organization. 2017. Female genital mutilation. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/.

  • Zagzebski. 2010. Exemplarist Virtue Theory. Metaphilosophy 41(1/2): 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kluge, EH.W. (2022). A Definitional Preamble. In: The Right to Health Care: Ethical Considerations. The International Library of Bioethics, vol 92. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93838-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics