Abstract
In this chapter, we explain the role of environmental justice principles in people’s motivation to engage in sustainable behaviour. Subsequently, these principles are placed in the larger framework of Value-Belief-Norm-theory. We argue that these motivational accounts of sustainable behaviour fall short in explaining people’s decisions to engage in sustainable behaviour. First, besides motivation, people’s capabilities and opportunities may influence such behaviours, creating social inequality in sustainability transitions. We illustrate this with a case study on Dutch social housing residents’ attitudes toward a sustainable building renovation. Second, some people may be sceptical about climate change, which could also inhibit sustainable behaviour. Taken together, this chapter raises multiple questions regarding solidarity and social justice that warrant further discussion in the transition to more sustainable societies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2011). Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: The role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Human Ecology Review, 18(1), 30–40.
Bal, M., Stok, F. M., Van Hemel, C., & De Wit, J. B. (2021). Including social housing residents in the energy transition: A mixed-method case study on residents’ beliefs, attitudes, and motivation toward sustainable energy use in a zero-energy building renovation in the Netherlands. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.656781
Bögel, P. M., & Upham, P. (2018). Role of psychology in sociotechnical transitions studies: Review in relation to consumption and technology acceptance. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 28, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.01.002
Bullard, R. D., & Johnson, G. S. (2000). Environmental justice: Grassroots activism and its impact on public policy decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00184
Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Brutschin, E., & Sovacool, B. (2018). Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.015
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003). Justice and identity: Changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_03
de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior – How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831
de Haan, F. J., & Rotmans, J. (2018). A proposed theoretical framework for actors in transformative change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.017
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629.
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
Ebi, K. L., & Hess, J. J. (2020). Health risks due to climate change: Inequity in causes and consequences. Health Affairs, 39(12), 2056–2062. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01125
Eurobarometer. (2019). Special Eurobarometer 490 report climate change. Retrieved July 24, 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/support/docs/report_2019_en.pdf.
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2011). Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychological Science, 22(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610391911
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351435
Fielding, K. S., & Hornsey, M. J. (2016). A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121
Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R., & Louis, W. R. (2008). Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003
Franceschinis, C., Thiene, M., Scarpa, R., Rose, J., Moretto, M., & Cavalli, R. (2017). Adoption of renewable heating systems: An empirical test of the diffusion of innovation theory. Energy, 125, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.060
Glad, W. (2012). Housing renovation and energy systems: The need for social learning. Building Research and Information, 40(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.690955
Green, D. (2016). The spatial distribution of extreme climate events, another climate inequity for the world’s most vulnerable people. Environmental Research Letters, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/091002
Haltinner, K., & Sarathchandra, D. (2018). Climate change skepticism as a psychological coping strategy. Sociology Compass, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12586
Hennes, E. P., Kim, T., & Remache, L. J. (2020). A goldilocks critique of the hot cognition perspective on climate change skepticism. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.009
Hoffarth, M. R., & Hodson, G. (2016). Green on the outside, red on the inside: Perceived environmentalist threat as a factor explaining political polarization of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.002
Incropera, F. P. (2016). Climate change: A wicked problem: Complexity and uncertainty at the intersection of science, economics, politics, and human behavior. Cambridge University Press.
IPBES. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science- policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services (E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, & H. T. Ngo, Eds.). IPBES Secretariat.
IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016). Energy justice: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004
Johe, M. H., & Bhullar, N. (2016). To buy or not to buy: The roles of self-identity, attitudes, perceived behavioral control and norms in organic consumerism. Ecological Economics, 128, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.019
Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 1002–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002610009
Kammen, D. M., & Sunter, D. A. (2016). City-integrated renewable energy for urban sustainability. Science, 352(6288), 922–928. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9302
Kim, Y. H. (2019). Organic shoppers’ involvement in organic foods: Self and identity. British Food Journal, 121(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-03-2018-0202
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
Mitchell, B. C., & Chakraborty, J. (2014). Urban heat and climate justice: A landscape of thermal inequity in Pinellas County, Florida. Geographical Review, 104(4), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12039.x
O’Neill, S. (2020). More than meets the eye: A longitudinal analysis of climate change imagery in the print media. Climatic Change, 163, 9–26.
Pearson, A. R., Schuldt, J. P., Romero-Canyas, R., Ballew, M. T., & Larson-Konar, D. (2018). Diverse segments of the US public underestimate the environmental concerns of minority and low-income Americans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(49), 12429–12434. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804698115
Pohjolainen, P., Tapio, P., Vinnari, M., Jokinen, P., & Rasanen, P. (2016). Consumer consciousness on meat and the environment – Exploring differences. Appetite, 101, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.012
Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 21(3), 1015–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001
Postmes, T. (2015). Climate change and group dynamics. Nature Climate Change, 5(3), 195–196. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2537
Reese, G. (2016). Common human identity and the path to global climate justice. Climatic Change, 134(4), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1548-2
Reese, G., & Jacob. (2015). Principles of environmental justice and pro-environmental action: A two-step process model of moral anger and responsibility to act. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.011
Reese, G., & Kohlmann. (2015). Feeling global, acting ethically: Global identification and fairtrade consumption. Journal of Social Psychology, 155(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.992850
Renger, D., & Reese, G. (2017). From equality-based respect to environmental activism: Antecedents and consequences of global identity. Political Psychology, 38(5), 867–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12382
Rutjens, B. T., & van der Lee, R. (2020). Spiritual skepticism? Heterogeneous science skepticism in the Netherlands. Public Understanding of Science, 29(3), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520908534
Salazar, H. A., Oerlemans, L., & van Stroe-Biezen, S. (2013). Social influence on sustainable consumption: Evidence from a behavioural experiment. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(2), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2012.01110.x
Santangelo, A., & Tondelli, S. (2017). Occupant behaviour and building renovation of the social housing stock: Current and future challenges. Energy and Buildings, 145, 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.019
Schwartz, D., Loewenstein, G., & Aguero-Gaete, L. (2020). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour through green identity labelling. Nature Sustainability, 3(9), 746–752. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0543-4
Shepard, P. M., & Corbin-Mark, C. (2009). Climate justice. Environmental Justice, 2(4), 163–166.
Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2010). Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy, 39(4), 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019
Smith, J. R., Louis, W. R., Terry, D. J., Greenaway, K. H., Clarke, M. R., & Cheng, X. L. (2012). Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.001
Soron, D. (2010). Sustainability, self-identity and the sociology of consumption. Sustainable Development, 18(3), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.457
Sovacool, B. K., & Dworkin, M. H. (2015). Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications. Applied Energy, 142, 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002
Sovacool, B. K., & Hess, D. J. (2017). Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change. Social Studies of Science, 47(5), 703–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717709363
Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., van der Werff, E., & Lurvink, J. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and Behavior, 46(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512454730
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). A brief inventory of values. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(6), 984–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058006008
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 13(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204
Thunberg, G. (2018). You are stealing my future. Speech provided at the 2018 UN Climate Change conference, Katowice, Poland.
Trotta, G. (2018). Factors affecting energy-saving behaviours and energy efficiency investments in British households. Energy Policy, 114, 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.042
Turner, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420050102
Vainio, A., Pulkka, A., Paloniemi, R., Varho, V., & Tapio, P. (2020). Citizens’ sustainable, future-oriented energy behaviours in energy transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118801
Wahlström, M., Sommer, M., Kocyba, P., de Vydt, M., De Moor, J., Davies, S., & Uba, K. (2019). Protest for a future: Composition, mobilization and motives of the participants in Fridays for future climate protests on 15 March, 2019 in 13 European cities.
Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bal, M., Stok, M. (2022). Leaving No One Behind: Climate Change as a Societal Challenge for Social Justice and Solidarity. In: Yerkes, M.A., Bal, M. (eds) Solidarity and Social Justice in Contemporary Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93795-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93795-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93794-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93795-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)