Abstract
To maintain or even increase the ATCO’s situation awareness at a remote tower working position, augmentation features are introduced, such as automated tracking of objects. Moving objects (aircraft, vehicles, persons, etc.) the ATCO is interested in are tracked and augmented by this function. However, a tracking function is never reliable by 100% and nuisance tracking information occur, information, which is not of operational relevance and is disturbing to the ATCO. Not only human performance gains by “wanted” tracking information but also losses due to “nuisance” tracking information are to be expected. This paper investigates the effect of visual tracking function in a Remote Tower Optical System on ATCO’s acceptance and effects on situation awareness and workload. Erroneous tracking performance will be discussed within the framework of a response matrix (e.g. Wickens, Elementary Signal Detection Theory, Oxford University Press (2002) and Appendix B). It collects the correct and false (system) responses as conditional probabilities for two alternative situations (object to be tracked/object not to be tracked), or for signal and noise. In a human-in-the-loop real time simulation, seven ATCOs performed a realistic traffic scenario. The study was conducted at Remote Tower laboratory at DLR in Braunschweig. As an experimental condition the performance of the visual tracking was operationalized by the number of nuisance tracking indication: (1) none (no visual tracking (baseline)), (2) low, (3) medium, and (4) large number. The results show that ATCOs very much appreciate visual tracking information. ATCOs can more easily detect critical traffic situation, which increases their situation awareness and safety. Further on, acceptance is rather high and workload on a moderate level, and both parameters behave rather robustly, even when the number of nuisance tracking information increases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This chapter is a revised version of the conference paper Jakobi, Jörn and Meixner, Kim Laura (2018). Effects of Unwanted Tracking Boxes in a Remote Tower Control Environment. International Journal For Traffic And Transport Engineering (ICTTE Belgrade 2018), 27–28. Sep 2018, Belgrade. ISBN 978-86-916,153-4-5. Revisions include additional results and an update of the official EUROCAE ED-240A tracking terminology that progressed with its change 1 release from 2021.
References
Badke-Schaub, P., Hofinger, G., & Lauche, K. (2012). Psychologie des sicheren Handelns in Risikobranchen (pp. 3–20). Springer.
Dehn, D. M. (2008). Assessing the impact of automation on the air traffic controller: The SHAPE questionnaires. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 16, 127–146.
EUROCAE. (2021). Minimum Aviation System Performance Specification for Remote Tower Optical Systems. EUROCAE Working Group (WG) 100, Version ED-240A change 1, (in press).
Friedman-Berg, F., Allendoerfer, K., & Pai, S. (2008). Nuisance alerts in operational ATC environments: Classification and frequencies. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 52, 104–108.
Green, D. M. & Swets, J. A. (1988). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics, Peninsula publishing: Reprint edition, Los Altos Hills, CA
Fürstenau, N., Rudolph, M., Schmidt, M., Werther, B., Hetzheim, H., Halle, W., & Tuchscheerer, W. (2007). Flugverkehr-Leiteinrichtung (Virtual Tower). European Patent EP1791364A1. Priority 23.11.2005. granted 30.05.2007
Möhlenbrink, C., Papenfuss, A., & Jakobi, J. (2011). The role of workload for work organization in a remote tower control center. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 20(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.2514/atcq.20.1.5
Kraemer, J. & Süß H. -M. (2015). SARA-T: Validierung eines Echtzeit Mess- und Validierungstools für das Situationsbewusstsein. Available from Internet: http://elib.dlr.de/98839/2/DLRK_2015_Kraemer_Süß_20150914.pdf.
Papenfuss, A. & Möhlenbrink, C. (2016). Assessing Operational Validity of Remote Tower Control in High-Fidelity Simulation. In N. Fürstenau (Ed.), Virtual and Remote Control Tower. Research, Design, Development and Validation (S. 87–113). Schweiz: Springer International Publishing.
Schmidt, M., Rudolph, M., Werther, B., Möhlenbrink, C., & Fürstenau, N. (2007). Development of an augmented vision video-panorama human-machine interface for remote airport tower operation. In M. J. Smith & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Lecture Notes Computer Science (LNCS): Human Interface II (Vol. 4558, pp. 1119–1128). Springer.
SESAR. (2012). Instantaneous self assessment of workload. Available from Internet. Retrieved March 12, 2017, from https://ext.eurocontrol.int/ehp/?q=node/1585.
SESAR JU. (2014a). Remotely Provided Air Traffic Service for Single Aerodrome VALR (Remark: VALR=Validation report), SESAR JU Deliverable D08-02, Edition 00.05.02, 2014-05-01
SESAR JU. (2014b). VALR Multiple Remote TWR V2 (Remark: VALR=Validation report), SESAR JU Deliverable D97, Edition 00.01.00, 2014-06-11
Van Schaik, F. J., Roessingh, J. J. M., Lindqvist, G. & Fält, K. (2016a). Detection and Recognition for Remote Tower Operations. In N. Fürstenau (Ed.), Virtual and Remote Control Tower. Research, Design, Development and Validation (S. 53–65). Schweiz: Springer International Publishing.
Van Schaik, F. J., Roessingh, J. J. M., Bengtsson, J., Lindqvist, G. & Fält, K. (2016b). The Advanced Remote Tower System and Its Validation. In N. Fürstenau (Ed.), Virtual and Remote Control Tower. Research, Design, Development and Validation (S. 263–278). Schweiz: Springer International Publishing.
Wickens, T. D. (2002). Elementary Signal Detection Theory. Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jakobi, J., Meixner, K.L. (2022). Which Minimum Visual Tracking Performance is Needed in a Remote Tower Optical System?. In: Fürstenau, N. (eds) Virtual and Remote Control Tower. Research Topics in Aerospace. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93650-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93650-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93649-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93650-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)