Multiple Remote Tower Operations (MRTO) change the way air traffic is managed. In this concept, air traffic control officers (ATCOs) operate several aerodromes simultaneously from a specially designed working position, also referred to as a multiple remote tower module (MRTM). This change in operations also introduces significant changes in the ATCOs’ workflow and cognitive demands. In theory MRTO can facilitate the ATCOs’ ability to balance their mental workload through a flexible allocation of aerodromes to each MRTM, but new procedures need to be implemented to enable such flexible allocations: Appropriate handover procedures are needed to transfer aerodromes between MRTMs and their operators. This paper investigated the feasibility of handover procedures during simulated air traffic control as a mitigation to counteract inappropriate mental workload. In a human-in-the-loop real-time simulation, six ATCOs completed traffic scenarios with or without handover via two MRTM, dealing with a total of three aerodromes. Descriptive data showed no adverse short-term effects caused by the handovers and indicated possible beneficial long-term effects on cognitive capacity and safety. The handover procedures were overall feasible and accepted by the ATCOs, as a strategy to better balance mental workload in MRTO.
- Human performance
- Mental workload
- Situation awareness
- Air traffic control
- Remote tower
- Multiple remote tower
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Adams, S. R., Kane, R., & Bates, R. (1998). Validation of the China Lake Situational Awareness scale with 3D SART and S-CAT (452330D). China Lake, CA. Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division.
Akerstedt, T., & Gillberg, M. (1990). Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 52(1–2), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207459008994241
Brookings, J. B., Wilson, G. F., & Swain, C. R. (1996). Psychophysiological responses to changes in workload during simulated air traffic control. Biological Psychology, 42(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(95)05167-8
Causse, M., Fabre, E., Giraudet, L., Gonzalez, M., & Peysakhovich, V. (2015). EEG/ERP as a measure of mental workload in a simple piloting task. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 5230–5236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.594
Cooper, G. E., & Harper, R. P., JR. (1969). The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities (TN-D-5153). Moffet Field, California, USA. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19690013177
Dehn, D. M. (2008). Assessing the impact of automation on the air traffic controller: The SHAPE questionnaires. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 16(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.2514/atcq.16.2.127
Endsley, M. R. (1999). Situation awareness in aviation systems. In D. J. Garland (Ed.), Human factors in transportation. Handbook of aviation human factors. Erlbaum.
Friedrich, M., Hamann, A., & Jakobi, J. (2020). An eye catcher in the ATC domain: Influence of multiple remote tower operations on distribution of eye movements. In D. Harris & W.-C. Li (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Cognition and Design (17th Ed., Vol. 12187, pp. 262–277). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_21
Fürstenau, N. (Ed.). (2016). Research topics in aerospace. Virtual and remote control tower: Research, design, development and validation. Springer International Publishing. http://gbv.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=4528419. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28719-5
Hamann, A., & Carstengerdes, N. (2020). Fatigue Instantaneous Self-Assessment (F-ISA): Development of a short mental fatigue rating (DLR-IB-FL-BS-2020–64). Braunschweig. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Flugführung.
ten Have, J. M. (1993). The development of the NLR ATC Research Simulator (Narsim). Simulation Practice and Theory, 1(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0928-4869(93)90009-F
Jakobi, J., Hamann, A., Filipp, M., Kaufhold, R., & Priboj, O. (2019). Final project report: Project “PJ05 Remote Tower”. Grant no.: 730195, Call H2020-SESAR-2015–2, Topic SESAR.IR-VLD.Wave1–08–2015. https://www.sesarju.eu/sites/default/files/documents/projects/FPR/PJ05_D2.1_Final%20Project%20Report.pdf
Kahnemann, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall.
Mensen, H. (2014). Moderne Flugsicherung: Organisation, Verfahren, Technik (4. Aufl.). VDI-Buch. Springer Vieweg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54294-7
Möhlenbrink, C., Papenfuss, A., & Jakobi, J. (2012). The role of workload for work organisation in a remote tower control center. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 20(1), 5–26.
Radüntz, T. (2017). Dual frequency head maps: A new method for indexing mental workload continuously during execution of cognitive tasks. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 1019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.01019
Radüntz, T., Fürstenau, N., Mühlhausen, T., & Meffert, B. (2020). Indexing mental workload during simulated air traffic control tasks by means of dual frequency head maps. Frontiers in Physiology, 11, 300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00300
Roscoe, A. H. (1984). Assessing pilot workload in flight. In: AGARD Conference Proceedings Flight Test Techniques, Paris, France.
Roscoe, A. H., & Ellis, G. A. (1990). A subjective rating scale of assessing pilot workload in flight: A decade of practical use: A technical report (TR 90019). Farnborough, Hampshire. Procurement Executive, Ministry of Defence.
Stokes, A., & Kite, K. (1997). Flight stress: Stress, fatigue, and performance in aviation (Repr). Avebury.
Tattersall, A. J. (1994). Practical guidelines for workload assessment. In J. A. Wise, V. D. Hopkin, & D. J. Garland (Eds.), Aviation human factors series. Human factors certification of advanced aviation technologies: Proceedings of Human Factors Certification of Advanced Aviation Technologies Conference held at the Château de Bonas, near Toulouse, France, July 19–23, 1993 (pp. 193–205). Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press.
Tattersall, A. J., & Foord, P. S. (1996). An experimental evaluation of instantaneous self-assessment as a measure of workload. Ergonomics, 39(5), 740–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139608964495
Weinger, M. B. (1999). Vigilance, boredom, and sleepiness. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 15(7–8), 549–552. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009993614060
Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210123806
The authors thank SESAR Joint Undertaking for funding this project (European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 730195) as well as their project partners Oro Navigacija and Frequentis AG for their collaboration.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hamann, A., Jakobi, J. (2022). Changing of the Guards: The Impact of Handover Procedures on Human Performance in Multiple Remote Tower Operations. In: Fürstenau, N. (eds) Virtual and Remote Control Tower. Research Topics in Aerospace. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93650-1_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93649-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93650-1