Abstract
Economic cooperation among the countries of the Greater Tumen Initiative (GTI) is the basis for interaction in various fields, especially transport. It is obvious that transport infrastructure development and the border barriers influence reduction of are prerequisites for trade stimulation and developing other forms of regional integration. On the other hand, the transport corridors development, the borders control modernization, transshipment points, etc. - all these are dependent on their congestion with foreign trade flows. Consequently, the development and feasibility of transport projects implementation within Greater Tumen Initiative should count on the potential of foreign economic cooperation between member countries and the possible degree of interconnection of economies. This article presents the results of a study in the complementarity assessment of foreign economic cooperation within the framework of the Greater Tumen Initiative, its potential, and the foundations for understanding the realistic possibilities to implement transport projects that are aimed at servicing these commodity flows. In addition, an analysis of the current state of the transport infrastructure of cross-border cooperation is presented. Along with the assessment results, this study reflects the feasibility of cooperation in the transport sector within GTI and highlights priority areas to benefit Russia’s interests. The results of this study contribute in understanding of the problems and prospects for the GTI transport projects development and implementation taking into account the importance of an unstable geopolitical, financial and economic background.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lu, S., Shen, J.H., Li, W., Zhang, J.: A theory of economic development and dynamics of Chinese economy. Econ. Model. 86, 69–87 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.06.003
He, L.Y., Lin, X., Zhang, Z.: The impact of de-globalization on China’s economic transformation: evidence from manufacturing export. J. Policy Mod. 42, 628–660 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2020.02.001
Fleisher, B.M., Zhang, X.: China economic review 30 years. China Econ. Rev. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101616.. ISSN 1043-951X
Sim, S.G., Yoo, D.: A quantitative study on endogenous formation of comparative advantage in South Korea. Int. Rev. Econ. Finance 53, 71–87 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.10.005
Cheng, C.H.J.: Effects of foreign and domestic economic policy uncertainty shocks on South Korea. J. Asian Econ. 51, 1–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.05.001
Lim, E.S., Breuer, J.B.: Free trade agreements and market integration: evidence from South Korea. J. Int. Money Finance 90, 241–256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2018.09.010
Chu, A.M.Y., Lv, Z., Wagner, N.F., Wong, W.K.: Linear and nonlinear growth determinants: the case of Mongolia and its connection to China. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 43, 100693 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100693
Thorbecke, W.: East Asian value chains, exchange rates, and regional exchange rate arrangements. J. Asian Econ. 65, 101132 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2019.101132
Voskoboynikov, I.: Sources of long run economic growth in Russia before and after the global financial crisis. Russ. J. Econ. 3, 348–365 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2017.12.003
Mitsek, S.: Econometric model of Russian Federation: analysis and forecasts for 2018–2019. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51, 395–400 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.416
Ono, S.: Financial development and economic growth nexus in Russia. Russ. J. Econ. 3, 321–332 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2017.09.006
Bayramov, V., Rustamli, N., Abbas, G.: Collateral damage: the Western sanctions on Russia and the evaluation of implications for Russia’s post-communist neighbourhood. Int. Econ. 162, 92–109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2020.01.002
Magazzino, C., Mele, M.: On the relationship between transportation infrastructure and economic development in China. Res. Transp. Econ. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100947
Foo, N., Lean, H., Salim, R.: The impact of China’s one belt one road initiative on international trade in the ASEAN region. North Am. J. Econ. Finance 54, 101089 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2019.101089
Lall, S.V., Lebrand, M.: Who wins, who loses? Understanding the spatially differentiated effects of the belt and road initiative. J. Dev. Econ. 146 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102496
Nekhoroshkov, V., Aroshidze, A., Nekhoroshkov, E.: Transport support of Europe-Asia trade: structural shifts. Transp. Res. Procedia 54, 182–190 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.02.063
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nekhoroshkov, V. et al. (2022). Assessment of External Economic Cooperation in the Aspect of Transport Development of the Greater Tumen Initiative. In: Macioszek, E., Sierpiński, G. (eds) Present Approach to Traffic Flow Theory and Research in Civil and Transportation Engineering. TSTP 2021. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93370-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93370-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93369-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93370-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)