Abstract
In vibration-based structural health monitoring, data analysis for damage detection can be done in the time domain or in the feature domain. Time-domain methods have certain advantages compared to feature-domain methods. For example, statistical analysis may be more reliable, because the data dimensionality is often low and the number of data points large. In addition, the algorithm can be fully automated, because system identification is not necessary. In this paper, autocorrelation functions (ACF) replace the direct response measurements in the time-domain data analysis. ACFs have many advantages compared to the actual time history records. Their accuracy can be controlled by choosing a proper measurement period. Spatiotemporal correlation between the ACFs can be utilized, because they have the same form as a free decay of the system for stationary random processes. This makes it possible to manage with a smaller number of sensors. In the proposed method, a spatiotemporal covariance matrix is estimated using the ACFs of the training data from the undamaged structure under different environmental or operational conditions. Using novelty detection techniques, an extreme value statistics control chart is designed to detect damage. The direction of the largest discrepancy between the training and test data is used to localize damage. A numerical experiment was performed by simulating vibration measurements of a bridge deck under stationary random excitation and variable environmental conditions. The excitation or environmental variables were not measured. Damage was a crack in a steel girder. ACFs outperformed both direct measurement data and virtual sensor data in damage detection. Damage localization was successful in all cases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brincker R, Ventura C (2015) Introduction to operational modal analysis. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex
Rainieri C, Fabbroncio G (2014) Operational modal analysis of civil engineering: an introduction and guide for applications. Springer Science+Business, New York, USA
Au S-K (2017) Operational modal analysis. Modeling, Bayesian inference, uncertainty laws. Springer, Singapore
Kay SM (1998) Fundamentals of statistical signal processing. Detection theory. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., USA
Kullaa J (2020) Robust damage detection in the time domain using Bayesian virtual sensing with noise reduction and environmental effect elimination capabilities. J Sound Vib 473: 115232
Kullaa J (2018) Bayesian virtual sensing in structural dynamics. Mech Syst Signal Process 115:497–513
Sohn H (2007) Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring. Philos Trans R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci 365:539–560
Kullaa J (2011) Distinguishing between sensor fault, structural damage, and environmental or operational effects in structural health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(8):2976–2989
Kullaa J (2019) Comparison of time domain and feature domain damage detection. In: Proceedings of the 8th international operational modal analysis conference (IOMAC 2019), Copenhagen May 12–14, 2019, pp 115–126
Bendat JS, Piersol AG (2010) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, 4th edn. Wiley, Blackwell, Hoboken, N.J., USA
Basseville M (2009) Model-based statistical signal processing for change and damage detection. In: Boller C, Chang F-K, Fujino Y (eds) Encyclopedia of structural health monitoring. Wiley, pp 677–695
Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Dynamics of structures. 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Tarpø M, Friis T, Georgakis C, Brincker R (2020) The statistical errors in the estimated correlation function matrix for operational modal analysis. J Sound Vib 466:115013
Orlowitz E, Brandt A (2019) Influence of noise in correlation function estimates for operational modal analysis. In Mains M, Dilworth BJ (eds) Topics in modal analysis & testing, vol 9, Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series, pp 55–64
Kullaa J (2012) Whitening transformation in damage detection. In: Del Grosso AE, Basso P (eds) Smart structures: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Structural Control — EACS 2012, Genoa, Italy, June 18–20, 2012
Worden K, Allen D, Sohn H, Farrar CR (2002) Damage detection in mechanical structures using extreme value statistics. In: SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 4693, 9th annual international symposium on smart structures and materials, San Diego, CA, pp 289–299
Montgomery DC (1997) Introduction to statistical quality control, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
Brandt A (2011) Noise and vibration analysis: signal analysis and experimental procedures. Wiley, Chichester, Hoboken, N.J., USA
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported by Metropolia University of Applied Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kullaa, J. (2023). Damage Detection and Localization Using Autocorrelation Functions with Spatiotemporal Correlation. In: Wu, Z., Nagayama, T., Dang, J., Astroza, R. (eds) Experimental Vibration Analysis for Civil Engineering Structures. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 224. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93236-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93236-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93235-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93236-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)
