Skip to main content

EU Global Actorness in a World of Contested Leadership: Policies, Instruments and Perceptions

Abstract

This chapter frames the analysis that follows in this edited volume, discussing European Union international actorness in a context of increased contestation to the international liberal order. It introduces the contribution of this study to this discussion by engaging with the debates on global actorness and mapping new conceptual and theoretical avenues to better understand how agency and power are exerted at the global and regional levels. It also sets the roadmap for analysing how the EU has been repositioning itself in this contested international order, which is organised around three main lines: firstly, by looking at how the EU positions itself internationally in certain issue-areas; secondly by engaging, on the one hand, with the EU’s own perspective towards its regional contexts and, on the other hand, with the perspectives of regional actors on the EU; and, thirdly, by exploring non-European perspectives on EU actorness.

Keywords

  • European Union
  • Actorness
  • Capabilities
  • Recognition
  • Perceptions

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Federica Mogherini was the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, from 2014 to 2019.

References

  • Acharya, A. (2014). The end of American world order. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arikan, A. (2017). Turkey and the EU: An awkward candidate for EU membership? (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Arts, K., & Dickson, A. K. (Eds.). (2004). EU development cooperation. From model to symbol. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbé, E., & Johansson-Nogués, E. (2008). The EU as a modest ‘force for good’: The European neighbourhood policy. International Affairs, 84(1), 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, F. (2011). Building impossible states? State-building strategies and EU membership in the Western Balkans. Europe-Asia Studies, 63(10), 1783–1802.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A., & Lebanidze, B. (2017). ‘The transformative power of Europe’ beyond enlargement: The EU’s performance in promoting democracy in its neighbourhood. East European Politics, 33(1), 17–35.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A., Dimitrova, A., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2017). European Union enlargement and integration capacity: Concepts, findings, and policy implications. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2), 157–176.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T. (2010). The liberal order and the modern project. Millennium, 38(3), 535–543.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2003, December 12). A better Europe in a secure world. European security strategy. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2016, June). Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe. A global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy. Retrieved March 7, 2019, from https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/sites/globalstrategy/files/regions/files/eugs_review_web_0.pdf

  • Forsberg, T. (2013). The power of the European Union. What explains the EU’s (lack of) influence on Russia? Politique Européenne, 39, 22–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, R. H. (2002). Conceptualizing the European Union as an international actor: Narrowing the theoretical capability-expectations gap. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(3), 429–454.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haukkala, H. (2010). The EU-Russia strategic partnership. The limits of post- sovereignty in international relations. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. (1993). The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s international role. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(3), 305–328.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C., Smith, M., & Vanhoonacker, S. (Eds.). (2017). International relations and the European Union (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, P. (2016). In search of structural power: EU aid policy as a global political instrument. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Howorth, J. (2010). The EU as a global actor: Grand strategy for a global Grand Bargain? Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(3), 455–474.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world order. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakas, C. (2013). EU-Turkey: Integration without full membership or membership without full integration? A conceptual framework for accession alternatives. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6), 1057–1073.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Korosteleva, E. (2017). Eastern partnership: Bringing ‘the political’ back in. East European Politics, 33(3), 321–337.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Korosteleva, E., Natorski, M., & Simão, L. (2014). EU policies in the eastern neighbourhood: The practices perspective. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larivè, M. (2014). Debating European security and defense policy: Understanding the complexity. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2009). EU rules beyond EU borders: Theorizing external governance in European politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6), 791–812.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2013). Democracy promotion in the EU’s neighbourhood: From leverage to governance? Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mirel, P. (2018, January). The Western Balkans: Between stabilisation and integration in the European Union. Fondation Robert Schuman European Issues, 459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noutcheva, G. (2012). European foreign policy and the challenges of Balkan accession: Conditionality, legitimacy and compliance. Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pop, V. (2009, March 21). EU expanding its ‘sphere of influence’, Russia says. EUObserver. Retrieved March 12, 2019, from https://euobserver.com/foreign/27827

  • Popescu, N., & Wilson, A. (2009). The limits of enlargement-lite: European and Russian power in the troubled neighbourhood. European Council of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelili, B. (2011). Turkey: Identity, foreign policy, and socialization in a post- enlargement Europe. Journal of European Integration, 33(2), 235–249.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Samokhvalov, V. (2018). Russia and its shared neighbourhoods: A comparative analysis of Russia-EU and Russia-China relations in the EU’s Eastern neighbourhood and Central Asia. Contemporary Politics, 24(1), 30–45.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scheipers, S., & Sicurelli, D. (2007). Normative power Europe: A credible utopia? Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 435–457.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 661–679.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. E. (2005). The outsiders: The European neighbourhood policy. International Affairs, 81(4), 757–773.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2013). Foreign policy and development in the post Lisbon European Union. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26(3), 519–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderbaum, F., & Van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (2006). The EU as a global player: The politics of interregionalism. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Telò, M. (2009). The European Union and global governance. Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Toje, A. (2008). The consensus-expectations gap: Explaining Europe’s ineffective foreign policy. Security Dialogue, 39(1), 121–141.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, S. (2016). European Union economic diplomacy. The role of the EU in external economic relations. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunling, Z. (2016). China and its neighbourhood: Transformation, challenges and grand strategy. International Affairs, 92(4), 835–848.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Duarte Lopes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Freire, M.R., Lopes, P.D., Nascimento, D., Simão, L. (2022). EU Global Actorness in a World of Contested Leadership: Policies, Instruments and Perceptions. In: Freire, M.R., Lopes, P.D., Nascimento, D., Simão, L. (eds) EU Global Actorness in a World of Contested Leadership. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92997-8_1

Download citation