Skip to main content

Virtual Learning Environments in Hong Kong and the Digital Design Studio: When Needs Must

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agile Learning Environments amid Disruption

Abstract

In November 2019, the unfolding social and political situation in Hong Kong (HK) forced the closure of university campuses. The situation extended in 2020 due to COVID-19, with HK responding to the pandemic’s earliest stage in February 2020. When face-to-face interaction was forbidden, traditional methods of engagement needed to be replaced with innovative, creative and technologically driven modes of teaching. This chapter examines the adoption of a virtual design studio (VDS) at the Caritas Institute of Higher Education (CIHE) in Hong Kong. Analysed data inform both positives and challenges of VDS adaptation and indicative of underlying issues regarding communication, interaction, isolation and need for re-approaching architectural education. These lessons learnt can be further applied at other higher education virtual design studios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdullah, N., Beh, S., Tahir, M., Che Ani, A., & Tawil, N. (2011). Architecture design studio culture and learning spaces: A holistic approach to the design and planning of learning facilities. Procedia—Social and Behavioural Sciences, 15, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M. (2021a). UoP and caritas: Ratio of architectural design and architectural lectures. Internal Presentation, University of Portsmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M. (2021b). UoP and caritas: The ‘messes’ of architectural education. Internal Presentation, University of Portsmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, T., Jenkins, M., & Walker, R. (2006). A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(2), 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, N., Dalton, A., & Grant, M. (2010). Overcoming isolation in distance learning: Building a learning community through time and space. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 5(1), 27–64. https://doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2010.05010027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggal, C., & Bagasrawala, L. (2020). Promoting well-being and resilience of young people during COVID-19: An initiative with schools. In COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and responses of psychologists from India (pp. 63–75). Leister Sam Sudheer Manickam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrelly, T., Raftery, D., & Harding, N. (2018). Exploring lecturer engagement with the VLE: Findings from a multi-college staff survey. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(2), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2004). Case study research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 323–333). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, M., Mahmud, R., & Hassan, I. (2012). Digital studio vs. conventional in teaching architectural design process. Procedia—Social and Behavioural Sciences, 64, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C., & Merrick, B. (2020). Enabling music students’ well-being through regular Zoom cohort chats during the COVID-19 crises. In Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field (pp. 261–264). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D., Lotz, N., & Holden, G. (2017). Lurking and learning: Making learning visible in a Virtual Design Studio. In G. Pritchard & N. Lambert (Eds.), Proceedings of the LearnX Design London 2017 Conference, London, pp. 176–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvan, T. (2001). The pedagogy of virtual design studios. Automation in Construction, 10(3), 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, K., Seale, J., & Douce, C. (2021). Mental health in distance learning: A taxonomy of barriers and enablers to student mental wellbeing. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1899907

  • Maher, M. L., Simoff, S. J., & Cicognani, A. (2000). Understanding virtual design studios. Springer Science and Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malins, J., Gray, C., Pirie, I., Cordiner, S., & Mckillop, C. (2003). The virtual design studio: Developing new tools for learning, practice and research in design. In Proceedings of the 5th European academy of design conference, pp. 1–7. https://openair.rgu.ac.uk/handle/10059/622.

  • Mock, K. (2019, February). Experiences using discord as platform for online tutoring and building a CS community. In SIGCSE’19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 1284–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pektaş, Ş. T. (2015). The virtual design studio on the cloud: A blended and distributed approach for technology-mediated design education. Architectural Science Review, 58(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2015.1034085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, W. (2000). The design studio as a vehicle for change: The ‘Portsmouth Model’. In I. S. Pilling & D. Nicol (Eds.), Changing architectural education towards a new professionalism (pp. 241–251). Taylor & Francis Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C., Hudson, R., & Niblock, C. (2018). Collaborative learning in architectural education: Benefits of combining conventional studio, virtual design studio and live projects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 337–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Y., & Marshall, P. (2017). Research in the wild. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 10(3), i–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Institute of British Architects. (2021). RIBA procedures for validation and validation criteria for UK and international courses and examinations in architecture. Architecture.com. Retrieved April 12, 2021, from https://www.architecture.com/-/media/C51FE552841E45628A0F327593597FC5.pdf?la=en

  • Sara, R., & Parnell, R. (2020). Fear and learning in the architectural crit. Field Journal, 5(1), 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesselman, L. S., Cain, J., & DiVall, M. (2020). Improving and restoring the well-being and resilience of pharmacy students during a pandemic. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(6), ajpe8144. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel, M., & Ham, J. (2012). Virtual design studio within a blended social network. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 17(Special Issue), 397–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. RIBA Publications for RIBA Building Industry Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelden, D., Bharwani, S., Mitchell, W., & Williams, J. (1995). Requirements for virtual design review. Architectural Research Quarterly, 1(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135500002785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar J. (2020). ‘Zoom Fatigue’ is taxing the brain. Here’s why that happens. National Geographic website. Retrieved April 24, 2021, from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/04/coronavirus-zoom-fatigue-is-taxing-the-brain-here-is-whythat-happens/

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres Martín, C., Acal, C., El Honrani, M., & Mingorance Estrada, Á. C. (2021). Impact on the virtual learning environment due to COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(2), 582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vladoiu, M., & Constantinescu, Z. (2020). Learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Online education community, based on discord. In 2020 19th RoEduNet conference: Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet), pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojtowicz, J. (1995). Virtual design studio (Vol. 1). Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A., & Grover, R. (2020). Studio teaching falls victim to Covid. The RIBA Journal. https://www.ribaj.com/intelligence/studio-teaching-coronavirus-student-satisfaction-survey

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Bailey-Ross .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bailey-Ross, C., Andrews, M., Al Hasan, M.S., Haestier, A. (2022). Virtual Learning Environments in Hong Kong and the Digital Design Studio: When Needs Must. In: Jamil, M.G., Morley, D.A. (eds) Agile Learning Environments amid Disruption. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92979-4_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92979-4_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92978-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92979-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics