Skip to main content

Tracing the Sources of Contagion in the Oil-Finance Nexus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

We introduce an approach to trace the genesis of contagion occurring in the oil-finance nexus, which consolidates veteran non-linear oil price measures derived from the empirical oil literature, to construct a rule-based specification for filtering structural oil market shocks into calm and extreme episodes. Such identified conditions are useful to understand how changing scenarios in the international crude oil market influence the dynamic relationships between the crude oil, exchange rate, and stock markets. As we are the first to explicitly consider how the relationship between the exchange rate and stock market change under extreme oil market shocks, our applications to a small emerging oil-exporter provide novel results about this particular linkage. We find that the positive supply shocks and negative demand shocks associated with the 2014/2015 oil price crash coincide with a marked increase in the inverse exchange rate-stock market relationship. This highlights the importance of including exchange rates when analysing the dependence between oil and stock markets. Our results also show that international financial crises, such as the Asian flu and dot-com crash, are episodes of contagion in an otherwise weak oil-stock market relationship. In addition, we provide findings which are consistent with previous empirical literature that extreme demand-side oil market shocks tend to dominate the absolute increase in cross-market linkages and that the 2008/2009 global financial crisis is the most prominent contemporary event in the oil-finance nexus in a pre-COVID-19 world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A switch to a dirty floating exchange rate from a fixed exchange rate regime in Trinidad and Tobago occurred in April 1993. On this grounds we start our analysis in January 1996, to allow for some time for the economy to acclimatise to the new exchange rate regime.

  2. 2.

    The data are available from the US Energy Information Administration at www.eia.gov/international/data/world and accessed in November 2018.

  3. 3.

    It is important to note that Hamilton (2018) points out a data transformation error in the index of nominal freight rates underlying the Kilian (2009) global real economic activity measure, where the log operator is performed twice. Kilian (2019) acknowledges this coding error and corrects the global business cycle index. We use this updated data, which are available at https://sites.google.com/site/lkilian2019/research/data-sets and accessed in November 2018.

  4. 4.

    These data are available from the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) at fred.stlouisfed.org/, accessed in November 2018. Like Broadstock and Filis (2014), we use the Brent benchmark instead of the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) to represent the global price of oil. The latter has been traded at a discounted price since 2011 due to the US shale boom (Kilian, 2016). In light of such developments, Brent oil has further fortified its prominence as global benchmark, while the WTI price increasingly reflects US-specific dynamics (Manescu & Van Robays, 2016). Moreover, Trinidad and Tobago produces water-borne crude which is pegged to the Brent crude oil price benchmark, trading at either a premium or a discount to this international reference price.

  5. 5.

    Data are sourced from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) International Financial Statistics and retrieved via Thomson Reuters Eikon, accessed in November 2018.

  6. 6.

    These data are calculated using data from the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago (CBTT), and are available from www.central-bank.org.tt/statistics/data-centre and accessed in November 2018.

  7. 7.

    Returns are calculated as the first difference in the natural logarithm for each series, times 100.

  8. 8.

    We find no statistically significant asymmetric responses to positive and negative news for exchange rates and stock returns. However, in the case of oil returns, the asymmetric volatility tests show that the individual sign bias tests convey no asymmetric volatility in the standardised residuals, but the joint effects test is statistically significant. Therefore, we consider asymmetric GARCH variants for this particular series to accommodate for this artefact. Yet, an EGARCH(1,1) for oil returns, which we find to be the most suitable alternative GARCH specification for this series, shows that the leverage effects term is not significant. Further, the differences in dynamic correlations estimated from a model where oil returns follows either a GARCH(1,1) or an EGARCH(1,1) specification is negligible. As such, we revert to the parsimonious GARCH(1,1) model for oil returns.

  9. 9.

    The National Bureau of Economic Research defines the timespan of the Great Recession in the US from December 2007 to June 2009. The dating is obtained from www.nber.org/cycles, and accessed in November 2018.

  10. 10.

    The DCC model coefficients and dynamic correlations are estimated with the rmgarch package in R (see Ghalanos, 2019).

References

  • Abeysinghe, T. (2001). Estimation of direct and indirect impact of oil price on growth. Economics Letters, 73(2), 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram, Q. F. (2004). Oil prices and exchange rates: Norwegian evidence. The Econometrics Journal, 7(2), 476–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Janabi, M. A., Hatemi-J, A., & Irandoust, M. (2010). An empirical investigation of the informational efficiency of the GCC equity markets: Evidence from bootstrap simulation. International Review of Financial Analysis, 19(1), 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aloui, R., & Aïssa, M. S. B. (2016). Relationship between oil, stock prices and exchange rates: A vine copula based GARCH method. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 37, 458–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakakis, N., Chatziantoniou, I., & Filis, G. (2017). Oil shocks and stock markets: Dynamic connectedness under the prism of recent geopolitical and economic unrest. International Review of Financial Analysis, 50, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atems, B., Kapper, D., & Lam, E. (2015). Do exchange rates respond asymmetrically to shocks in the crude oil market? Energy Economics, 49, 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auty, R. M. (2017). Natural resources and small island economies: Mauritius and Trinidad and Tobago. The Journal of Development Studies, 53(2), 264–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basher, S. A., Haug, A. A., & Sadorsky, P. (2012). Oil prices, exchange rates and emerging stock markets. Energy Economics, 34(1), 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basher, S. A., Haug, A. A., & Sadorsky, P. (2016). The impact of oil shocks on exchange rates: A Markov-switching approach. Energy Economics, 54, 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basher, S. A., Haug, A. A., & Sadorsky, P. (2018). The impact of oil-market shocks on stock returns in major oil-exporting countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 86, 264–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, C., & Kilian, L. (2016a). Forty years of oil price fluctuations: Why the price of oil may still surprise us. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(1), 139–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, C., & Kilian, L. (2016b). Understanding the decline in the price of oil since June 2014. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 3(1), 131–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnland, H. C. (2009). Oil price shocks and stock market booms in an oil exporting country. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 56(2), 232–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadstock, D. C., & Filis, G. (2014). Oil price shocks and stock market returns: New evidence from the United States and China. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 33, 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale, G. M., Hunter, J., & Ali, F. M. (2014). On the linkages between stock prices and exchange rates: Evidence from the banking crisis of 2007–2010. International Review of Financial Analysis, 33, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBTT FSR. (2019). Financial stability report 2018 (Tech. Rep.). Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago (CBTT).

    Google Scholar 

  • CBTT MPR. (2019, November). Monetary policy report (Tech. Rep.). Vol. XXI, No. 2, Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago (CBTT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, M. A., & Scrimgeour, F. (2019). Oil prices and stock market anomalies. Energy Economics, 83, 578–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Hamori, S., & Kinkyo, T. (2014). Macroeconomic impacts of oil prices and underlying financial shocks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 29, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chkili, W., & Nguyen, D. K. (2014). Exchange rate movements and stock market returns in a regime-switching environment: Evidence for BRICS countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 31, 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W. M. (1984). Booming sector and Dutch disease economics: Survey and consolidation. Oxford Economic Papers, 36(3), 359–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W. M. (2012). Dutch disease in Australia: Policy options for a three-speed economy. Australian Economic Review, 45(3), 290–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degiannakis, S., Filis, G., & Arora, V. (2018a). Oil prices and stock markets: A review of the theory and empirical evidence. Energy Journal, 39(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Degiannakis, S., Filis, G., & Panagiotakopoulou, S. (2018b). Oil price shocks and uncertainty: How stable is their relationship over time? Economic Modelling, 72, 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, N. A. B., Delgado, E. B., & Saucedo, E. (2018). The relationship between oil prices, the stock market and the exchange rate: Evidence from mexico. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 45, 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation. Journal of Business& Economic Statistics, 20(3), 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Ng, V. K. (1993). Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. The Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1749–1778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerland, M. W., & Sandvik, L. (2009). Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 30(5), 490–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filis, G., Degiannakis, S., & Floros, C. (2011). Dynamic correlation between stock market and oil prices: The case of oil-importing and oil-exporting countries. International Review of Financial Analysis, 20(3), 152–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, K. J., & Rigobon, R. (2002). No contagion, only interdependence: Measuring stock market comovements. The Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2223–2261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, R., Martin, V. L., & Tang, C. (2010). A new class of tests of contagion with applications. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 28(3), 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry-McKibbin, R., Hsiao, C.Y.-L., & Tang, C. (2014). Contagion and global financial crises: Lessons from nine crisis episodes. Open Economies Review, 25(3), 521–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghalanos, A. (2019). rmgarch: Multivariate GARCH models. R package version 1.3-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güntner, J. H. F. (2014). How do international stock markets respond to oil demand and supply shocks? Macroeconomic Dynamics, 18(8), 1657–1682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. (1996). This is what happened to the oil price-macroeconomy relationship. Journal of Monetary Economics, 38(2), 215–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. (2009a). Causes and consequences of the oil shock of 2007–08. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 215–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. (2009b). Understanding crude oil prices. The Energy Journal, 30(2), 179–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. (2018). Measuring global economic activity. manuscript, University of California at San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, A. J. (2018). A top-down approach to identifying bull and bear market states. International Review of Financial Analysis, 55, 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, Q., Liu, B.-Y., Zhao, W.-L., & Fan, Y. (2018). Modelling dynamic dependence and risk spillover between all oil price shocks and stock market returns in the BRICS. International Review of Financial Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, W., & Ratti, R. A. (2013). Oil shocks, policy uncertainty and stock market return. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 26, 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, W., Ratti, R. A., & Yoon, K. H. (2015a). The impact of oil price shocks on the stock market return and volatility relationship. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 34, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, W., Ratti, R. A., & Yoon, K. H. (2015b). Time-varying effect of oil market shocks on the stock market. Journal of Banking& Finance, 61, S150–S163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayalar, D. E., Küçüközmen, C. C., & Selcuk-Kestel, A. S. (2017). The impact of crude oil prices on financial market indicators: Copula approach. Energy Economics, 61, 162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian, L. (2009). Not all oil price shocks are alike: Disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. American Economic Review, 99(3), 1053–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian, L. (2016). The impact of the shale oil revolution on US oil and gasoline prices. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(2), 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian, L. (2019). Measuring global real economic activity: Do recent critiques hold up to scrutiny? Economics Letters, 178, 106–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian, L., & Park, C. (2009). The impact of oil price shocks on the US stock market. International Economic Review, 50(4), 1267–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian, L., & Vigfusson, R. J. (2011a). Are the responses of the US economy asymmetric in energy price increases and decreases? Quantitative Economics, 2(3), 419–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian, L., & Vigfusson, R. J. (2011b). Nonlinearities in the oil price-output relationship. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 15(S3), 337–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S. (2018). Impacts of supply and demand factors on declining oil prices. Energy, 155, 1059–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kole, E., & Dijk, D. (2017). How to identify and forecast bull and bear markets? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 32(1), 120–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippner, L. (2016). Documentation for measures of monetary policy. Reserve Bank of New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritzman, M., Li, Y., Page, S., & Rigobon, R. (2011). Principal components as a measure of systemic risk. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 37(4), 112–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.-H. (2012). The comovement between exchange rates and stock prices in the Asian emerging markets. International Review of Economics & Finance, 22(1), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahadeo, S. M. R., Heinlein, R., & Legrenzi, G. D. (2019). Energy contagion analysis: A new perspective with application to a small petroleum economy. Energy Economics, 80, 890–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manescu, C., & Van Robays, I. (2016). Forecasting the Brent oil price: Addressing time-variation in forecast performance (Tech. Rep.). CESifo Group Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. I., & Ratti, R. A. (2009). Crude oil and stock markets: Stability, instability, and bubbles. Energy Economics, 31(4), 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mork, K. A. (1989). Oil and the macroeconomy when prices go up and down: An extension of Hamilton’s results. Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), 740–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagan, A. R., & Sossounov, K. A. (2003). A simple framework for analysing bull and bear markets. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(1), 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., & Ratti, R. A. (2008). Oil price shocks and stock markets in the US and 13 European countries. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2587–2608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reboredo, J. C., Rivera-Castro, M. A., & Zebende, G. F. (2014). Oil and US dollar exchange rate dependence: A detrended cross-correlation approach. Energy Economics, 42, 132–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigobon, R. (2019). Contagion, spillover, and interdependence. Economía, 19(2), 69–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, X., & Yao, X. (2018). Do financial structures affect exchange rate and stock price interaction? Evidence from emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 34, 64–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Wu, C., & Yang, L. (2013). Oil price shocks and stock market activities: Evidence from oil-importing and oil-exporting countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(4), 1220–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y., Qin, S., Li, X., Zhu, S., & Wei, G. (2019). Oil price fluctuation, stock market and macroeconomic fundamentals: Evidence from China before and after the financial crisis. Finance Research Letters, 30, 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization of ‘student’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34(1/2), 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y.-J., Fan, Y., Tsai, H.-T., & Wei, Y.-M. (2008). Spillover effect of US dollar exchange rate on oil prices. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(6), 973–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Earlier versions of this chapter were presented at the 1st International Conference on Energy, Finance, and the Macroeconomy in November 2017 (Montpellier Business School, France); at the Keele Business School Economics and Finance Research Group Seminar Series in February 2019 (Keele University, UK); at the Money, Macro, and Finance Ph.D. Conference in April 2019 (City, University of London, UK); and at the INFINITI 2019 Conference on International Finance in June 2019 (Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, UK). We are grateful to the participants and assigned discussants at these events for their insightful feedback, which have served to refine the research. The usual disclaimer applies. We also declare that this research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott M. R. Mahadeo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mahadeo, S.M.R., Heinlein, R., Legrenzi, G.D. (2022). Tracing the Sources of Contagion in the Oil-Finance Nexus. In: Floros, C., Chatziantoniou, I. (eds) Applications in Energy Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92957-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92957-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92956-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92957-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics