Abstract
In this paper we report on the development of an agent-based model (ABM) simulating the behaviour of voters and the positioning of political parties in Austria. The aim is to create what-if scenarios taking into account contextual changes, such as political crises as well as changes in parties’ policy positions and voters’ attitudes. Drawing on data from the Austrian National Election Study (AUTNES) and the Chapel Hill Expert Survey (CHES), we are able to map both demand- and supply-side characteristics. We present first results of the simulation analysis of applied strategies of voters and parties. This way, we are able to create first what-if scenarios that show how results of elections would change, if voters applied different strategies when deciding which party to vote for. In developing a simulation for the case of Austria as a reference model, we lay the foundation for more universal applications of ABM in political science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Populism and Civic Engagement (PaCE) project is funded by the EU H2020 initiative under grant agreement no. 822337. Website: http://popandce.eu/.
- 2.
References
Kritzinger, S., Zeglovits, E., Aichholzer, J., Glantschnigg, C.; Glinitzer, K., Johann, D., Thomas, K., Wagner, M. (2017): AUTNES pre- and post panel study 2013. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5859 Data file Version 2.0.1. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12724
Polk, J., Rovny, J., Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Koedam, J., Kostelka, F., Marks, G., Schumacher, G., Steenbergen, M., Vachudova, M., Zilovic, M.: Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data. Res. Politics 4(1), 1–9 (2017)
Johnson, P.: Simulation modeling in political science. Am. Behav. Sci. 42(10), 1509–1530 (1999)
Kollman, K., Page, S.: Computational methods and models of politics. In: Tesfatsion, L., Judd, K. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 2, pp. 1433–1463. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam (2005)
Downs, A.: An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper Collins, New York (1957)
Kollman, K., Miller, J., Page. S.: Adaptive parties in spatial elections. Am Polit. Sci. Rev. 86(4), 929–937 (1992)
Laver, M.: Policy and the dynamics of political competition. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99(2), 263–281 (2005)
Laver, M., Schilperoord, M.: Spatial models of political competition with endogenous political parties. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 362(1485), 1711–1721 (2007)
Muis, J.: Simulating political stability and change in the Netherlands (1998–2002): an agent-based model of party competition with media effects empirically tested. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 13(2), 4 (2010)
Muis, J., Scholte, M.: How to find the ‘winning formula’? Conducting simulation experiments to grasp the tactical moves and fortunes of populist radical right parties. Acta Politica 48(1), 22–46 (2013)
Huckfeldt, R., Sprague, J.: Discussant effects on vote choice: intimacy, structure, and interdependence. J. Politics 53(1), 122–158 (1991)
McClurg, S.: Social networks and political participation: the role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Polit. Res. Q. 56(4), 449–464 (2003)
Lake, R., Huckfeldt, R.: Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Polit. Psychol. 19(3), 567–584 (1998)
Laver, M., Sergenti, E.: Party Competition: an Agent-Based Model. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)
Schweighofer, S., Garcia, D., Schweitzer, F.: An agent-based model of multi-dimensional opinion dynamics and opinion alignment. Chaos Interdisc. J. Nonlinear Sci. 30(9), 093139 (2020)
Baldassarri, D., Bearman, P.: Dynamics of political polarization. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72(5), 784–811 (2007)
Lau, R., Kleinberg, M., Ditonto, T.: Measuring voter decision strategies in political behavior and public opinion research. Public Opin. Q. 82(S1), 911–936 (2018)
McCombs, M.: Setting the Agenda: the Mass Media and Public Opinion. Polity Press, Cambridge (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Meyer, R., Fölsch, M., Dolezal, M., Heinisch, R. (2022). An Evidence-Driven Model of Voting and Party Competition. In: Czupryna, M., Kamiński, B. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92843-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92843-8_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92842-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92843-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)