Skip to main content

How Reliable Are Out-of-Distribution Generalization Methods for Medical Image Segmentation?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pattern Recognition (DAGM GCPR 2021)

Abstract

The recent achievements of Deep Learning rely on the test data being similar in distribution to the training data. In an ideal case, Deep Learning models would achieve Out-of-Distribution (OoD) Generalization, i.e. reliably make predictions on out-of-distribution data. Yet in practice, models usually fail to generalize well when facing a shift in distribution. Several methods were thereby designed to improve the robustness of the features learned by a model through Regularization- or Domain-Prediction-based schemes. Segmenting medical images such as MRIs of the hippocampus is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. But these brain images often suffer from distribution shift due to the patient’s age and various pathologies affecting the shape of the organ. In this work, we evaluate OoD Generalization solutions for the problem of hippocampus segmentation in MR data using both fully- and semi-supervised training. We find that no method performs reliably in all experiments. Only the V-REx loss stands out as it remains easy to tune, while it outperforms a standard U-Net in most cases.

Supported by the Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG) with grant [ZMVI1-2520DAT03A]. The final authenticated version of this manuscript will be published in Lecture Notes in Pattern recognition in the life and natural sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahuja, K., Shanmugam, K., Varshney, K.R., Dhurandhar, A.: Invariant risk minimization games (2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.04692

  2. Arjovsky, M., Bottou, L., Gulrajani, I., Lopez-Paz, D.: Invariant risk minimization. http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02893

  3. Boccardi, M., et al.: Training labels for hippocampal segmentation based on the EADC-ADNI harmonized hippocampal protocol 11(2), 175–183 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.12.002, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S155252601402891X

  4. Carmo, D., Silva, B., Yasuda, C., Rittner, L., Lotufo, R.: Hippocampus segmentation on epilepsy and Alzheimer’s disease studies with multiple convolutional neural networks (2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.05058

  5. Castro, D.C., Walker, I., Glocker, B.: Causality matters in medical imaging. Nat. Commun. 11(1) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17478-w

  6. Dinsdale, N.K., Jenkinson, M., Namburete, A.I.L.: Deep learning-based unlearning of dataset bias for MRI harmonisation and confound removal. bioRxiv (2020). https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.09.332973, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/14/2020.10.09.332973

  7. Ganin, Y., Lempitsky, V.: Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation (2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.7495

  8. Isensee, F., et al.: nnU-net: self-adapting framework for U-net-based medical image segmentation (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.10486

  9. Krueger, D., et al.: Out-of-distribution generalization via risk extrapolation (REx) (2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00688

  10. Kulaga-Yoskovitz, J., et al.: Multi-contrast submillimetric 3 tesla hippocampal subfield segmentation protocol and dataset 2(1), 150059 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.59, http://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201559

  11. Litjens, G., et al.: A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 42 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005

  12. Simpson, A.L., et al.: A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithms (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.09063

  13. Xu, Y., et al.: Age effects on hippocampal structural changes in old men: the HAAS. NeuroImage 40(3), 1003–1015 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.034, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381190701141X

  14. Xue, Y., Feng, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, Y.: Dual-task self-supervision for cross-modality domain adaptation. In: Martel, A.L., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12261, pp. 408–417. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, H., et al.: Dilated dense u-net for infant hippocampus subfield segmentation 13, 30 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2019.00030, https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fninf.2019.00030/full

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine Sanner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sanner, A., González, C., Mukhopadhyay, A. (2021). How Reliable Are Out-of-Distribution Generalization Methods for Medical Image Segmentation?. In: Bauckhage, C., Gall, J., Schwing, A. (eds) Pattern Recognition. DAGM GCPR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13024. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92659-5_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92659-5_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92658-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92659-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics