Skip to main content

The Impact of Social Networks on Student Motivation and Achievement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Discourses of Globalisation, Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity

Part of the book series: Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research ((GCEP,volume 29))

  • 461 Accesses

Abstract

The last two decades have seen the emergence of social-technological networks, which have changed the teaching methods and technological learning techniques. Social networks, learning technologies, and digital teaching tools are gradually becoming major work tools, integrated in the different educational systems. The integration of digital technologies has changed the classical face-to-face classroom study space and transformed teachers and lecturers into figures that guide, direct, and mediate between the students and the study contents by means of an array of teaching methods. The research literature indicates a growing awareness that significant learning among students originates not only from an authorized external source such as a teacher. In fact, most students derive information also from their peer group, while conveying information collaboratively. There are several methods of collaborative learning, the most central of which are social networks. In addition, studies conducted in formal and informal learning environments show that formal learning is only a small part of one’s learning experience throughout life. The role of formal learning in imparting academic knowledge is only about 19% until the end of high school. A review of the research literature indicates an association between the contribution of social networks to social-academic interaction and the impact of both on learning motivation and academic achievements. Using the review, we constructed a model containing several dimensions, in order to produce a proper structuring of the elements involved in using interactions on social networks as an academic and pedagogical tool for improving motivation to learn and academic achievements. Our model may serve as a tool for decision makers and for future studies in the area of social networks in educational systems. The model can support for enhancing social and academic interactions, for improving student achievements and for creating a technology-supporting class climate. The review and the model have considerable significance in light of the growing entrance of technology to all areas of our life and particularly education and teaching, as well as to understand how social networks contribute to classroom climate, while charting the necessary social and emotional needs and how to increase the efficacy of this social technology in order to meet these needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adani, Y., Nuri, A., Karni, A., & Wartman, M. (2012). Necrophagy: Not on (individual) motivation alone: Reward and motivation learning mechanisms in the brain and classroom. Mofet Institute. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldoory, L. (2003). The empowerment of feminist scholarship in 221 public relations and the building of a feminist paradigm. International Communication Association, 10, 221–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, C. M. V. B., Santos, A. P. Z., Bonilla, S. H., Giannetti, B. F., & Huisingh, D. (2013). The roles, perspectives and limitations of environmental accounting in higher educational institutions: An emergy synthesis study of the engineering programme at the Paulista University in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (Eds.). (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromberg-Martin, E. S., Matsumoto, M., & Hikosaka, O. (2010). Dopamine in motivational control: Rewarding, aversive, and alerting. Neuron, 68(5), 815–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmi, J., & Buchnik, D. (2012). The impact of pedagogical and technological components in e-learning processes on students thinking tendencies in academic courses. Mofet Institute, 53, 120–143. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chengyan, Z., Xiaolin, X., Wei, Z., Jianmin, C., & Richard, E. (2019). How health communication via Tik Tok makes a difference: A content analysis of Tik Tok accounts run by Chinese provincial health committees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicognani, A. (2000). Concept mapping as a collaborative tool for enhanced online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(1), 93–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshen, M., Buchnik, D., & Bruchson, S. (2014). Is the classroom arena moving to WhatsApp? The Twelfth Annual National Conference of Meital, 248–255. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domenici, V. (2020). Distance education in chemistry during the epidemic Covid-19. Substantia, 4(1), 961. https://doi.org/10.13128/Substantia-961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eunjin, S., & You-kyung, L. (2018). Does enjoying friendship help or impede academic achievement? Academic and social intrinsic value profiles predict academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 38(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1392007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A. (2018). The essence of educational counseling. Educational Counseling, 22, 16–30. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gon, S., & Rawekar, A. (2017). Effectivity of e-learning through WhatsApp as a teaching learning tool. MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, 4(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.18311/mvpjms.v4i1.8454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, G., & Kaufeldt, M. (2015). The motivated brain: Improving student attention, engagement, and perseverance. ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannula, M. S. (2006). Motivation in mathematics: Goals reflected in emotions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N. (2015). What does the research say about good teaching and the outstanding teacher? Teaching in Academy, 5, 41–62. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, L. A., Castek, W. J., O’Byrne, I., & Zawilinski, L. (2012). Using peer collaboration to support online reading, writing, and communication: An empowerment model for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 28(3), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.676431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joubert, M. (2013). Using digital technologies in mathematics teaching: Developing an understanding of the landscape using three “grand challenge” themes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9430-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaniel, S. (2006). Education for thinking: Cognitive education for the control of consciousness. Ramot. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Karami, A., Lundy, M., Webb, F., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). Twitter and research: A systematic literature review through text mining. IEEE Access, 8, 67698–67717. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, T. T., & Chen, I. (Eds.). (2011). Ubiquitous learning: Strategies for pedagogy. Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koohang, A., Riley, L., Smith, T., & Schreurs, J. (2009). E-learning and constructivism: From theory to application. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5(1), 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, C., & Straesser, R. (2010). Place and use of new technology in the teaching of mathematics: ICMI activities in the past 25 years. Mathematics Education, 42(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0219-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, C. (2000). Could education be in the age of postmodernism? Sifriat Poalim. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Levoy, R. (2008). A breakthrough in motivation. Amatzia Publishing. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, S. A. (2020). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html

  • Meishar-Tal, H. (2016). Please open phones - use of smartphones in academic teaching. Journal of Teaching Affairs in Higher Education Institutions, 6, 20–23. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, E. (2018). What is Instagram, anyway. Here’s what Instagram is all about and how people are using it. Lifewire, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrushk-Klarman, A. (2007). We are not in the problem but in criticism (pp. 1–6). Adam. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachmias, R., & Mioduser, D. (2001). Integrating the Internet in education. Eureka, 14, 6–16. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir Gal, O. (2000). Distance learning: The role of the teacher as a facilitator in the virtual learning environment. Flight and Act, 6, 103–129. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2010). Toward a positive psychology of academic motivation. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670109598780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2009). The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1), 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince-Meller, R., & Lev, A. (2018). Teacher – Are You screening me? Do class WhatsApp groups undermine perceived teacher authority? Research Center for Innovation in Learning Technologies, 14, 262–265. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Putri, N., & Aminatun, D. (2021). Using Facebook to practice writing skill: What do the students think? Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappel, L. (2017). Self-direction in on-line learning. Journal of Educational Systems, 1(4), 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resta, P., & Shonfeld, M. (2013). A study of trans-national learning teams in a virtual world. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2932–2940). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, R., & Deci, A. (2011). Internal motivation and external motivation: Classical definitions and new directions. Echo of Education, 7, 62–68. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centred therapy: its current practice, implications, and theory. Houghton Miffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., Ventura, S., & Garcia, E. (2008). Data mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial. Computers & Education, 51(1), 368–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., Perkins, H., & Bodey, K. (2016). Academic motivation and information literacy self-efficacy: The importance of a simple desire to know. Library & Information Science Research, 38(1), 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotem, A., & Peled, Y. (2008). School turns on-line. Mofet Institute. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Srecko, J., Dragan, G., Thomas, M., Vitomir, K., & Marek, H. (2015). Learning at distance: Effects of interaction traces on academic achievement. Computers & Education, 87, 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, K., Parker, S., & O’Shea, D. (2017). When does proactivity have a cost? Motivation at work moderates the effects of proactive work behavior on employee job strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 3, 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R., King, F., & Nelson, G. (2012). Student learning through social media. Journal of Sociological Research, 2, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rosmalen, L., Van Der Horst, F. C., & Van der Veer, R. (2016). From secure dependency to attachment: Mary Ainsworth’s integration of Blatz’s security theory into Bowlby’s attachment theory. History of Psychology, 19(1), 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (2004). Learning in the social context: Development of psychological processes. The United Kibbutz. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, N. (2007). Only the enthusiasts hold the baton – Is that so? Teacher-teachers eager to improve teaching with the help of the computer. In college, 19, 403–415. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, L. (2011). A review of school-based positive psychology interventions. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 28(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1375/aedp.28.2.75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yechiel, T. (2008). How to do constructivist learning. Echo of Education, 4, 40–44. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitza Davidovitch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tzur, S., Katz, A., Davidovitch, N. (2022). The Impact of Social Networks on Student Motivation and Achievement. In: Zajda, J., Davidovitch, N., Majhanovich, S. (eds) Discourses of Globalisation, Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92608-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92608-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92607-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92608-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics