Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards an Immersive Debriefing of Serious Games in Virtual Reality: A Framework Concept

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Games and Learning Alliance (GALA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 13134))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 834 Accesses

Abstract

Debriefing and simulation are two complementary and indivisible phases for the use of serious game. However, practices of debriefing vary depending on the objectives and the context. With the advent of new virtual reality simulations, it is interesting to identify methods of debriefing for the trainer and learner in this situation. This paper provides a global review of debriefing in a serious game context and considers the findings tied to a virtual reality context. The purpose of this analysis is to find a proper solution and to use virtual reality technology to improve the debriefing experience. We finally propose a tool for virtual reality simulations that provides an immersive debriefing system that includes a replay system of the simulation occurred as well as a possibility to restart at any moment of the replay. As such, we think that the participant can have a better understanding and reflection of what he/she has experienced as well as a possibility to explore other choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sawyer, T., et al.: More than one way to debrief. Simul. Healthc. 11, 9 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Piro, J., O’Callaghan, C.: Constructive destabilization in the liminal space: doing, debriefing and deliberating in mixed reality simulations. 21, 178–208 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Laurent, M.: La scénarisation sous l’emprise de la métaphore spatiotemporelle: approche réflexive en environnement virtuel. 183 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crookall, D.: Serious games, debriefing, and simulation/gaming as a discipline. Simul. Gaming 41, 898–920 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Obikwelu, C., Read, J.C.: The serious game constructivist framework for children’s learning. Procedia. Comput. Sci. 15, 32–37 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rim, D., Shin, H.: Effective instructional design template for virtual simulations in nursing education. Nurse Educ. Today 96, 104624 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson, D., et al.: Serious video games for health how behavioral science guided the development of a serious video game. Simul. Gaming 41, 587–606 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crookall, D.: Engaging (in) gameplay and (in) debriefing. Simul. Gaming 45(4–5), 416–427 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ryoo, E.N., Ha, E.-H.: The Importance of Debriefing in Simulation-Based Learning (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Verkuyl, M., et al.: An exploration of debriefing in virtual simulation. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 13, 591–594 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, Y.-J.: The utilization of debriefing for simulation in healthcare A literature review. Nurse Educ. Pract. 10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, S.S., De Gagne, J.C.: Instructor-led vs. peer-led debriefing in preoperative care simulation using standardized patients. Nurse Educ. Today 71, 34–39 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Verkuyl, M., et al.: Comparison of debriefing methods after a virtual simulation: an experiment. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 19, 1–7 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Isaranuwatchai, W., Alam, F., Hoch, J., Boet, S.: A cost-effectiveness analysis of self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises in perioperative medicine in Canada. J. Educ. Eval. Health Prof. 13, 44 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ha, E.-H.: Effects of peer-led debriefing using simulation with case-based learning: written vs. observed debriefing. Nurse Educ. Today 84, 104249 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dudas, K., Wheeler, J.: Faculty re-enactment videos as a tool in simulation debriefing. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 40, 25–30 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boet, S., et al.: Within-team debriefing versus instructor-led debriefing for simulation-based education: a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 258, 53–58 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boet, S., et al.: Looking in the mirror: Self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises. Crit. Care Med. 39, 1377–1381 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Verkuyl, M., et al.: Exploring Self-Debriefing plus group-debriefing: a focus group study. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 43, 3–9 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Verkuyl, M., et al.: Comparison of self-debriefing alone or in combination with group debrief. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 37, 32–39 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lapum, J.L., et al.: Self-Debriefing in Virtual Simulation: Nurse Educator 44, E6–E8 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kun, Y., Hubert, J., Bin, L., Huan, W.X.: Self-debriefing model based on an integrated video-capture system: an efficient solution to skill degradation. J. Surg. Educ. 76, 362–369 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reed, S.J.: Measuring learning and engagement during debriefing: a new instrument. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 46, 15–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2020.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller, E.T., Farra, S., Simon, A.: Asynchronous online debriefing with health care workers: lessons learned. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 20, 38–45 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Atthill, S., Witmer, D., Luctkar-Flude, M., Tyerman, J.: Exploring the impact of a virtual asynchronous debriefing method after a virtual simulation game to support clinical decision-making. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 50, 10–18 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Verkuyl, M., et al.: Combining self-debriefing and group debriefing in simulation. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 39, 41–44 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Verkuyl, M., et al.: Adding self-debrief to an in-person simulation: a mixed-methods study. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 47, 32–39 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rueda-Medina, B., et al.: A combination of self-debriefing and instructor-led debriefing improves team effectiveness in health science students. Nurse Educ. 46, E7 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Verkuyl, M., et al.: Exploring debriefing combinations after a virtual simulation. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 40, 36–42 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Grund, C.K., Schelkle, M.: Developing serious games with integrated debriefing: findings from a business intelligence context. Bus Inf Syst Eng 62, 87–101 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nicholson, J., Gillespie, R., Bickerdike, S., et al.: OP13 Immersive video for simulation debriefing: ‘record and review’ in 360-degrees using a virtual reality headset. BMJ Simul. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 5 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Voyer, S., Hatala, R.: Debriefing and feedback: two sides of the same coin? Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 10, 67–68 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Messaoudi, F., Ksentini, A., Simon, G., Bertin, P.: Performance analysis of game engines on mobile and fixed devices, ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications. 13(4), pp. 57:1–57:28 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université Paris-Saclay, Univ Evry, IBISC, 91020, Evry-Courcouronnes, France

    Jonathan Degand, Guillaume Loup & Jean-Yves Didier

Authors
  1. Jonathan Degand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guillaume Loup
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jean-Yves Didier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Loup .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. NATO STO, La Spezia, Italy

    Francesca de Rosa

  2. Le Mans University, Le Mans Cedex 9, France

    Iza Marfisi Schottman

  3. HPU, Royal Institute of Technology, Södertälje, Stockholms Län, Sweden

    Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge

  4. University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Francesco Bellotti

  5. Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland

    Pierpaolo Dondio

  6. Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France

    Margarida Romero

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Degand, J., Loup, G., Didier, JY. (2021). Towards an Immersive Debriefing of Serious Games in Virtual Reality: A Framework Concept. In: de Rosa, F., Marfisi Schottman, I., Baalsrud Hauge, J., Bellotti, F., Dondio, P., Romero, M. (eds) Games and Learning Alliance. GALA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13134. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92182-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92182-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92181-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92182-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation