Skip to main content

Combing the Data: Re-evaluating ‘Weaving’ Combs in the Textile Production Sequence during the British Iron Age

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ancient Textile Production from an Interdisciplinary Perspective

Abstract

Bulleid and Gray cemented the association of long-handled combs from Iron Age contexts with weaving in the early twentieth century. Since then, the long-handled comb has been generally included as part of the weaving chaîne opératoire. Early attempts were made to assess use-wear; however, it was not until the 1970s and 1980s that wear patterns were critically examined. Building on a century of research, Tina Tuohy’s doctoral project further examined wear patterns and offered an alternative proposal, citing use-wear as evidence. In archaeological research, combs are frequently associated with other known textile production tools, which has embedded their place in the prehistoric textile toolkit for Britain. Although this notion is generally agreed, their utility within the textile production sequence remains questionable. In illustrations, combs are usually depicted with the warp-weighted loom, despite Tuohy’s proposition to the contrary. Analyzing the history of long-handled comb research revealed the necessity for re-evaluation This chapter presents preliminary data on a recording rubric and methodology for assessing utilitarian comb function from the archaeological evidence from Danebury hillfort (Hampshire, UK).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Though MacGregor (1985: 189) mentioned that these combs might be residual or else Anglo-Saxon or Viking in date.

  2. 2.

    Anderson (1871: 553–557) offers several sources that cite a description which matches the long-handled comb. He notes from Rous, Archaeologica Attica that a “χερχίδ [sic], or pecten or the sley, like a comb” is operating as a way to beat weft into place (emphasis in original). A note from Juvenal’s Satires (9.30) illustrates a disgruntled man who complains of an improperly woven garment: “Et male percussas textoris pectine Galli…and insufficiently struck with a comb of a Gaulish weaver” (emphasis in original). These explanations, and the others he cites which are not printed here, are enough for Anderson to draw the conclusion that a comb was used as a beater on Greek and Roman looms, and that if Iron Age weavers in Gaul are using the same warp-weighted loom technology, then the long-handled combs from Iron Age Britain were the pecten textoris.

  3. 3.

    They also reference modern Scandinavian weavers who use the spatha or ‘weaving sword’.

  4. 4.

    Cunnington (1923) also doubted their suitability for weaving.

  5. 5.

    Use-wear is the accumulation of physical friction on the surface of a material that may be from manufacture or use. See Marreiros et al. (2015) for an historical account of use-wear studies.

  6. 6.

    Tuohy (1995) mentioned conducting experiments with warp-weighted loom weaving which led her to suspect that the use-wear observed did not match the evidence on the archaeological samples. The parameters of her experiments were not published.

  7. 7.

    A processed of controlled rotting.

  8. 8.

    Early Pre-Roman Iron Age (800–500 BC): 3, Middle Pre-Roman Iron Age (500–100 BC): 3; Late Pre-Roman Iron Age (100 BC–43 AD): 16; unphased (1).

References

  • Anderson J (1871) Notes on the evidence of spinning and weaving in the brochs or pictish towers supplied by the stone whorls and the long-handled ‘broch combs’ found in them. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 9:548–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J (1883) Scotland in pagan times: The Iron Age, Vol. 1. David Douglas, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey R (1999) Those weaving combs – yet again. Archaeological Textiles Newsletter 28:5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradfield J (2018) Some thoughts on bone artefact discoloration at archaeological sites. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 17:500–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulleid A, Gray HSG (1911) The Glastonbury lake village: A full description of the excavations and the relics discovered, 1892–1907, Vol. 1. Glastonbury Antiquarian Society, Somerset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulleid A, Gray HSG, Munro R, Dawkins WB, Jackson JW, Andrews CW, Reid C (1917) The Glastonbury Lake Village, Vol. II. Glastonbury Antiquarian Society, Somerset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulleid A, Gray HSG (1948) The Meare Lake Village. A full description of the excavations and the relics from the eastern half of the West Village, 1910–1933, Vol. 1. Taunton Castle, Somerset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittock H (2014) Arts and crafts in Iron Age Britain: Reconsidering the aesthetic effects of weaving combs. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 33(3):313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles J, Minnitt S (1995) ‘Industrious and Fairly Civilized’: The Glastonbury Lake village. Somerset Levels Project and Somerset County Council Museums Service, Somerset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughtrey M (1871) Notes on materials found in a kitchen midden at Hillswick, Shetland, with special reference to long-handled combs. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 9:118–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowfoot G (1945) The bone ‘gouges’ of Maiden Castle and other sites. Antiquity 19(75):157–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe B (1984) Danebury: An Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire. Vol. 2: The finds. Council for British Archaeology, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe B (1991) Danebury: An Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire. Vol. 4: The site. Council for British Archaeology, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe B (1995) Danebury Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire. Vol. 6: A hillfort community in perspective. CBA Research Report 102. Council for British Archaeology, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunnington ME (1923) The Early Iron Age inhabited site at All Cannings Cross farm Wiltshire: A description of the excavations, and objects found, by Mr. and Mrs. BH Cunnington, 1911–1922. George Simpson & Company, Devizes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis O (2013) Re-interpreting the Danebury assemblage: houses, households, and community. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 79:353–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/ppr.2013.16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRoche CD (1995) Textile production in Britain during the first millennium B.C. Unpublished dissertation, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRoche D (2012) England: Bronze and Iron Ages. In: Gleba M, Mannering U (eds) Textiles and textile production in Europe from Prehistory to AD 400. Ancient Textiles Series 11. Oxbow Books, Oxford and Oakville, p 444–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupras T, Schultz J (2013) Taphonomic bone staining and color changes in forensic contexts. In: Pokines J, Symes SA (eds) Manual of forensic taphonomy. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, p 315–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick AP (2020) A face from the British Iron Age: A decorated Iron Age weaving comb from Harwell, Oxfordshire. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 39(2):177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox AL (1881) XXI. – Excavations at Mount Caburn Camp, near Lewes, conducted in September and October, 1877, and July, 1878. Archaeologia 46(2):423–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleba M, Harris S (2019) The first plant bast fibre technology: Identifying splicing in archaeological textiles. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 11(5):2329–2346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffitts J (2001) Bone tools from Los Pozos. In: Choyke AM, Bartosiewicz L (eds) Crafting bone – skeletal technologies through time and space: Proceedings from the 2nd meeting of the (ICAZ) worked bone research group. BAR 937. Archaeopress, Oxford, p 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grömer K (2016) The art of prehistoric textile making. Veröffentlichungen der Prähistorischen Abteilung 5. Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallén Y, O’Neill M (1994) The use of bone and antler at Foshigarry and Bac Mhic Connain, two Iron Age sites on North Uist, Western Isles. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 124:189–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Haselgrove C, Armit I, Champion TC, Creighton J, Gwilt A, Hill JD, Hunter F, Woodward A (2001) Understanding the British Iron Age: An agenda for action. Trust for Wessex Archaeology, Salisbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges JW (1973) Textiles and textile production in Prehistoric Britain. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshall AS (1950) Textiles and weaving appliances in Prehistoric Britain. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 16:130–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodder I and Hedges JW (1977) Weaving combs: Their typology and distribution with some introductory remarks on date and function. In: Collis J (ed.) The Iron Age in Britain – a review. Sheffield University Press, Sheffield, p 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson F (1964) Cultural Grouping within the British pre-Roman Iron Age. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 30, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones AM, Diaz-Guardamino M, Crellin RJ (2016) From artefact biographies to ‘multiple objects’: A new analysis of the decorated plaques of the Irish Sea region. Norwegian Archaeological Review 49(2):113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joy J (2015) ‘Things in process’: Biographies of British Iron Age pits. In: Hahn HP, Jung M, Kienlin T, Kreuz PA, Hofmann KP, Joy J, Wittekind S, Niehaus M, Boschung D (eds) Biography of objects. Wilhelm Fink Verlag, Paderborn, p 125–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy J (2011) Fancy objects in the British Iron Age: Why decorate? Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 77:205–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller F (1866) The lake dwellings of Switzerland and other parts of Europe. Longmans, Green & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling Roth H (1918) Studies in primitive looms. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 47:113–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman RL, Lyman C (1994) Vertebrate taphonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor A (1985) Bone, antler, ivory, and horn: The technology of skeletal materials since the Roman period. Croom Helm, London and Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marreiros J, Mazzucco N, Gibaja JF, Bicho N (2015) Macro and micro evidence from the past: The state of the art of archeological use-wear studies. In: Marreiros J, Mazzucco N, Gibaja JF, Bicho N (eds) Use-wear and residue analysis in archaeology. Springer, Cham, p 5–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PJ (1972) Experimental archaeology. Worcestershire Archaeological Newsletter 9(7):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roes A (1963) Bone and antler objects from the Frisian terp-mounds. Tjeenk Willink HD and Zoon NV, Haarlem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rösel-Mautendorfer H, Grömer K, Kania K (2012) Farbige Bänder aus dem prähistorischen Bergwerk von Hallstatt. Experimente zur Herstellung von Repliken, Schwerpunkt Faseraufbereitung und Spinnen. In: Weller U, Lessig-Weller T, Hanning E, Strugalla-Voltz B (eds) Experimentelle Archäologie in Europa – Bilanz 2012. Europäische Vereinigung zur Förderung der Experimentellen Archäologie, Bad Langensalza, p 190–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder ML (1997) Fleece types and Iron Age wool textiles. Archaeological Textiles Newsletter 25:13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellwood L (1984) Objects of bone and antler. In: Cunliffe B (ed.) Danebury: An Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire. Vol. 2: The finds. Council for British Archaeology, London, p 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serjeanston D (2007) Intensification of animal husbandry in the Late Bronze Age? The contribution of sheep and pigs. In: Haselgrove C, Pope R (eds) The Earlier Iron Age in Britain and the near Continent. Oxbow Books, Oxford, p 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RA (ed.) (1925) Guide to the Early Iron Age antiquities. British Museum, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolpe MH (1874) Sur la découvertes faites dans l’Ile de Björkö. Congrès internationale d’anthropologie et d’archaéologie préhistoriques, Session 7, Vol. 2. Stockholm, p 619–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuohy C (1992) Long-handled ‘weaving combs’ in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 58: 385–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuohy C (1995) Prehistoric combs of antler and bone. Unpublished dissertation, University of Exeter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuohy T (1999) Prehistoric combs of antler and bone. BAR 285. Hadrian Books Ltd, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuohy T (2004) Weaving as a domestic craft at the Iron Age site of Glastonbury Lake Village in Somerset, Britain. Journal of Wetland Archaeology 4(1):97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler REM (1943) Maiden Castle, Dorset. Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London Number 12. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Helen Chittock and two anonymous reviewers for commenting on an earlier draft of this chapter. All errors remain my own. This research formed part of my doctoral thesis project which has re-evaluated textile tools and their depositional contexts within Iron Age Britain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Beamer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beamer, J. (2022). Combing the Data: Re-evaluating ‘Weaving’ Combs in the Textile Production Sequence during the British Iron Age. In: Ulanowska, A., Grömer, K., Vanden Berghe, I., Öhrman, M. (eds) Ancient Textile Production from an Interdisciplinary Perspective. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92170-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92170-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92169-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92170-5

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics