Abstract
Assessment of violence risk is a core competency for psychiatrists. A patient’s risk of violence is considered in everyday clinical decisions and is essential when a patient makes a threat toward another individual. Due to significant variability of Tarasoff-limiting statutes and case law from state to state, psychiatrists may be unsure of how to proceed when they determine that their patient presents a serious risk of harm to another. Is an explicit threat required to breach confidentiality to warn a potential victim? Is there legal justification to breach confidentiality in the absence of an explicit threat? What about a moral justification? Can a psychiatrist be found liable for a patient’s violence in the absence of an explicit threat? This chapter provides an overview of the legal framework underlying malpractice liability for patient violence, reviews principles of violence risk assessment, and offers practical risk management strategies to reduce psychiatrists’ risk of liability for patient violence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnold, S., Deai, A., & DeMatteo, D. (2018). Keeping guns away from potentially dangerous people. Monitor on Psychology, 49(8). Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/monitor/2018/09/jn
Ask for a Gun Violence Restraining Order. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.courts.ca.gov/33679.htm
Atkinson, A., Anderson, Z., Hughes, K., Bellis, M., Sumnall, H., & Syed, Q. (2009). Interpersonal violence and illicit drugs. Retrieved from Liverpool: https://www.who.int/violenceprevention/interpersonal_violence_and_illicit_drug_use.pdf
Bardessono v. Michels, 3 Cal. 3d 780. (1970).
California Civil Code § 43.92. (2013).
Douglas, K., Hart, S., Webster, C., & Belfrage, H. (2013). Rating sheet for version 3 of the HCR-20. In Mental health, law, and policy institute. Simon Fraser University.
Fazel, S., Smith, N., Chang, Z., & Geddes, J. (2018). Risk factors for interpersonal violence: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 213(4), 609–614.
Friedman, S. H., Prakash, C., & Nagle-Yang, S. (2019). Postpartum psychosis: Protecting mother and infant. Current Psychiatry, 4(18), 13–21.
Gold, L., & Vanderpool, D. (2018). Legal regulation of restoration of firearms rights after mental health prohibition. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 46(3), 298–308.
Hartwig, T., Solis, L., & Lemmen, C. (2011). The duty to protect from third parties: Common law versus statute. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39(4), 594–597.
Hospitalization of mentally ill definitions, O.R.C. 5122.01(A)(2004).
Johnson, R., Persad, G., & Sisti, D. (2014). The Tarasoff rule: The implications of interstate variation and gaps in professional training. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 42(4), 469–477.
Kontos, N., Taylor, J., & Beach, S. (2018). The therapeutic discharge II: An approach to documentation in the setting of feigned suicidal ideation. General Hospital Psychiatry, 51, 30–35.
Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 497 F. Supp. 185 (D. Neb. 1980).
Merchants Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Fargo v. United States, 272 F.Supp. 409 (D.N.D. 1967).
Michaelsen, K. (2017). Duties to third parties. In T. Wasser (Ed.), Psychiatry and the law- basic principles (pp. 35–51). Springer International Publishing.
Mumola, C., & Karberg, J. (2006). Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/dudsfp04.pdf
Naidu v. Laird, 539 A.2d 1064 (Delaware 1988).
Patterson, T. (2012). Police chief: Suspect bought over 6,000 rounds of ammunition through Internet. CNN. Retrieved from www.cnn.com/2012/07/20/colorado-shooting-weapons/index.html
Peck v. Counseling Service of Addison County, 499 A.2d 422 (Vt. 1985).
Petersen v. Washington, 671 P.2d 230 (Wash. 1983).
PRMS (Producer). (2020). Professional risk management services cause of loss- claims and lawsuits 1986-2019. Retrieved from https://www.prms.com/media/2439/cause-of-loss-2019.pdf
Resnick, P., & Saxton, A. (2019). Malpractice liability due to patient violence. Focus, 17(4), 343–348. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20190022
Saxton, A., Resnick, P., & Noffsinger, S. (2018). Chief complaint: Homicidal. Assessing violence risk. Current Psychiatry, 17(5), 27–35.
Scott, C., & Resnick, P. (2017). Clinical assessment of aggression and violence. In R. Rosner & C. Scott (Eds.), Principles and practice of forensic psychiatry (3rd ed., pp. 623–631).
Skeem, J., Kennealy, P., Monahan, J., et al. (2016). Psychosis uncommonly and inconsistently precedes violence among high-risk individuals. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(1), 40–49.
Soulier, M. F., Maislen, A., & Beck, J. C. (2010). Status of the psychiatric duty to protect, circa 2006. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38(4), 457–473. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21156904
Tarasoff v. The Regents of the University of California, 529 P.2d 553 (California Supreme Court 1974).
Tarasoff v. The Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d Cal. 3d 425 (California Supreme Court 1976).
Volk v. DeMeerleer, 386 P.3d 254 (Washington Supreme Court 2016).
Williams, T. (2019). What are “red flag’ gun laws, and how do they work?. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/06/us/red-flag-laws.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saxton, A., Resnick, P. (2022). Patient Violence. In: Ash, P., Frierson, R.L., Friedman, S.H. (eds) Malpractice and Liability in Psychiatry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91975-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91975-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91974-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91975-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)